The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abstractions for software architecture and tools to support them
Open accessAbstract
Architectures for software use rich abstractions and idioms to describe system components, the nature of interactions among the components, and the patterns that guide the composition of components into systems. These abstractions are higher level than the elements usually supported by programming languages and tools. They capture packaging and interaction issues as well as computational functionality. Well-established (if informal) patterns guide the architectural design of systems. We sketch a model for defining architectures and present an implementation of the basic level of that model. Our purpose is to support the abstractions used in practice by software designers. The implementation provides a testbed for experiments with a variety of system construction mechanisms. It distinguishes among different types of components and different ways these components can interact. It supports abstract interactions such as data flow and scheduling on the same footing as simple procedure call. It can express and check appropriate compatibility restrictions and configuration constraints. It accepts existing code as components, incurring no runtime overhead after initialization. It allows easy incorporation of specifications and associated analysis tools developed elsewhere. The implementation provides a base for extending the notation and validating the model.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages
Medvidovic, N., & Taylor, R. N. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.825767 · Cited by 1,987
A formal basis for architectural connection
Allen, R., & Garlan, D. (1997) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/258077.258078 · Cited by 1,253
Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes
Malone, T. W., Crowston, K., Lee, J., Pentland, B., Dellarocas, C., Wyner, G., Quimby, J., Osborn, C. S., Bernstein, A., Herman, G., et al. (1999) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.3.425 · Cited by 755
Architectural mismatch or why it's hard to build systems out of existing parts
Garlan, D., Allen, R., & Ockerbloom, J. (1995) · Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering - ICSE '95 · doi:10.1145/225014.225031 · Cited by 552
Dynamic structure in software architectures
Magee, J., & Kramer, J. (1996) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering · doi:10.1145/239098.239104 · Cited by 536
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaw, M., DeLine, R., Klein, D. V., Ross, T. L., Young, D. M., & Zelesnik, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 314-335
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-3520
- 2326-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2146082668
- Cited by
- 813
- References
- 0
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abstractions for software architecture and tools to support them. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/32.385970
- The paper
- Shaw, M., DeLine, R., Klein, D. V., Ross, T. L., Young, D. M., & Zelesnik, G. (1995). Abstractions for software architecture and tools to support them. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.385970
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.