The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a general multi-view registration technique
Abstract
We present an algorithm that reduces significantly the level of the registration errors between all pairs in a set of range views. This algorithm refines initial estimates of the transformation matrices obtained from either the calibrated acquisition setup or a crude manual alignment. It is an instance of a category of registration algorithms known as iterated closest-point (ICP) algorithms. The algorithm considers the network of views as a whole and minimizes the registration errors of all views simultaneously. This leads to a well-balanced network of views in which the registration errors are equally distributed, an objective not met by previously published ICP algorithms which all process the views sequentially. Experimental results show that this refinement technique improves the calibrated registrations and the quality of the integrated model for complex multi-part objects. In the case of scenes comprising man-made objects of very simple shapes, the basic algorithm faces problems common to all ICP algorithms and so must be extended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object modeling by registration of multiple range images
Chen, Y., & Medioni, G. (2002) · Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.1991.132043 · Cited by 1,409
Cited by
Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm
Rusinkiewicz, S., & Levoy, M. (2002) · Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling · doi:10.1109/im.2001.924423 · Cited by 3,945
A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics
Pomerleau, F., Colas, F., & Siegwart, R. (2015) · Foundations and Trends® in Robotics · doi:10.1561/2300000035 · Cited by 717
ICP registration using invariant features
Sharp, G. C., Lee, S. W., & Wehe, D. K. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.982886 · Cited by 614
Multiview registration for large data sets
Pulli, K. (2003) · Second International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (Cat. No.PR00062) · doi:10.1109/im.1999.805346 · Cited by 559
Least squares 3D surface and curve matching
Gruen, A., & Akca, D. (2005) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.02.006 · Cited by 536
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergevin, R., Soucy, M., Gagnon, H., & Laurendeau, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 540-547
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125989410
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a general multi-view registration technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/34.494643
- The paper
- Bergevin, R., Soucy, M., Gagnon, H., & Laurendeau, D. (1996). Towards a general multi-view registration technique. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.494643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.