The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance
Abstract
A large number of algorithms have been proposed for feature subset selection. Our experimental results show that the sequential forward floating selection algorithm, proposed by Pudil et al. (1994), dominates the other algorithms tested. We study the problem of choosing an optimal feature set for land use classification based on SAR satellite images using four different texture models. Pooling features derived from different texture models, followed by a feature selection results in a substantial improvement in the classification accuracy. We also illustrate the dangers of using feature selection in small sample size situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward machine emotional intelligence: analysis of affective physiological state
Picard, R. W., Vyzas, E., & Healey, J. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.954607 · Cited by 2,334
Radiomics: the process and the challenges
Kumar, V., Gu, Y., Basu, S., Berglund, A., Eschrich, S. A., Schabath, M. B., Forster, K., Aerts, H. J. W. L., Dekker, A., Fenstermacher, D., et al. (2012) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.010 · Cited by 2,258
“Different feature selection methods can be used for this purpose and may exploit machine learning or statistical approaches [72–76].”
MethodHistopathological Image Analysis: A Review
Gurcan, M. N., Boucheron, L. E., Can, A., Madabhushi, A., Rajpoot, N. M., & Yener, B. (2009) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2009.2034865 · Cited by 2,052
A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data
Bolón-Canedo, V., Sánchez-Maroño, N., & Alonso-Betanzos, A. (2013) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-012-0487-8 · Cited by 830
FloatBoost learning and statistical face detection
Li, S. Z., & Zhang, Z. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.68 · Cited by 525
Franke, L., Bakel, H. V., Fokkens, L., de Jong, E. D., Egmont-Petersen, M., & Wijmenga, C. (2006) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/504300 · Cited by 476
MoodScope: building a mood sensor from smartphone usage patterns
LiKamWa, R., Liu, Y., Lane, N. D., & Zhong, L. (2013) · Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services · doi:10.1145/2462456.2464449 · Cited by 444
Chiu, S. J., Allingham, M. J., Mettu, P. S., Cousins, S. W., Izatt, J. A., & Farsiu, S. (2015) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.6.001172 · Cited by 377
Feature Selection and Activity Recognition System Using a Single Triaxial Accelerometer
Gupta, P., & Dallas, T. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2014.2307069 · Cited by 335
Empirically Building and Evaluating a Probabilistic Model of User Affect
Conati, C., & Maclaren, H. (2009) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-009-9062-8 · Cited by 328
Giger, M. L., Chan, H., & Boone, J. (2008) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3013555 · Cited by 311
Pham, T. N., Tran, L. V., & Dao, S. V. T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3031914 · Cited by 262
“Some examples are Recursive feature elimination [17], Sequential feature selection algorithms [18], and Genetic algorithms [19].”
MethodExtreme Learning Machine-Based Classification of ADHD Using Brain Structural MRI Data
Peng, X., Lin, P., Zhang, T., & Wang, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079476 · Cited by 194
An improved boosting based on feature selection for corporate bankruptcy prediction
Wang, G., Ma, J., & Yang, S. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.033 · Cited by 187
Vivekanandan, T., & Sriman Narayana Iyengar, N. C. (2017) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.09.011 · Cited by 185
Clinical prediction from structural brain MRI scans: A large-scale empirical study
Initiative, F. T. A. D. N., Sabuncu, M. R., & Konukoglu, E. (2015) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-014-9238-1 · Cited by 161
Targeting Prospective Customers: Robustness of Machine-Learning Methods to Typical Data Challenges
Simester, D., Timoshenko, A., & Zoumpoulis, S. I. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3308 · Cited by 133
Machine learning in bioinformatics: A brief survey and recommendations for practitioners
Bhaskar, H., Hoyle, D. C., & Singh, S. (2006) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.09.002 · Cited by 109
Detection of surface defects on raw steel blocks using Bayesian network classifiers
Pernkopf, F. (2004) · Pattern Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10044-004-0232-3 · Cited by 113
Improved detection of Parkinsonian resting tremor with feature engineering and Kalman filtering
Yao, L., Brown, P., & Shoaran, M. (2020) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.09.021 · Cited by 68
Dear, B. F., Gandy, M., Karin, E., Ricciardi, T., Langman, N., Staples, L. G., Fogliati, V. J., Sharpe, L., McLellan, L. F., & Titov, N. (2016) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000639 · Cited by 40
Predicting Brain Functional Connectivity Using Mobile Sensing
Obuchi, M., Huckins, J. F., Wang, W., daSilva, A., Rogers, C., Murphy, E., Hedlund, E., Holtzheimer, P., Mirjafari, S., & Campbell, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3381001 · Cited by 29
College of Engineering, P., Kamathe, R., Joshi, K., & P.E.S's Modern College of Engineering, I. (2017) · ICTACT Journal on Image and Video Processing · doi:10.21917/ijivp.2017.0219 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, A., & Zongker, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-158
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148633389
- Cited by
- 2,171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 104.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
