Cited by 525Face recognition and analysisFace and Expression RecognitionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

FloatBoost learning and statistical face detection

Li, S.Z., Zhenqiu Zhang·2004·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

A novel learning procedure, called FloatBoost, is proposed for learning a boosted classifier for achieving the minimum error rate. FloatBoost learning uses a backtrack mechanism after each iteration of AdaBoost learning to minimize the error rate directly, rather than minimizing an exponential function of the margin as in the traditional AdaBoost algorithms. A second contribution of the paper is a novel statistical model for learning best weak classifiers using a stagewise approximation of the posterior probability. These novel techniques lead to a classifier which requires fewer weak classifiers than AdaBoost yet achieves lower error rates in both training and testing, as demonstrated by extensive experiments. Applied to face detection, the FloatBoost learning method, together with a proposed detector pyramid architecture, leads to the first real-time multiview face detection system reported.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2004.68

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The essence of cascade is to learn more discriminative classifiers by using multistage classifiers, such that early stages discard a large number of easy negative samples so that later stages can focus on handling more difficult examples.

    “The essence of cascade (Felzenszwalb et al. 2010a;Bourdev and Brandt 2005;Li and Zhang 2004) is to learn more discriminative classifiers by using multistage classifiers, such that early stages discard a large number of easy negative samples so that later stages can focus on handling more difficult examples.”

    From Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as Li and Zhang 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, S. Z., & Zhang, Z.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2004-09
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1112-1123
ISSN
0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140274257
Cited by
525
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 43
FWCI
43.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
AdaBoost, boosting, error rate minimization, weak classifier selection, real-time face detection
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Face, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Models, Biological, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Cluster Analysis, Information Storage and Retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review