Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 720

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A theoretical study on six classifier fusion strategies

Kuncheva, L.I.·2002·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

We look at a single point in feature space, two classes, and L classifiers estimating the posterior probability for class /spl omega//sub 1/. Assuming that the estimates are independent and identically distributed (normal or uniform), we give formulas for the classification error for the following fusion methods: average, minimum, maximum, median, majority vote, and oracle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/34.982906

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 720

Metadata

Authors
Kuncheva, L. I.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2002
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
281-286
ISSN
0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160767978
Cited by
720
References
1
FWCI
28.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theoretical study on six classifier fusion strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/34.982906
The paper
Kuncheva, L. I. (2002). A theoretical study on six classifier fusion strategies. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.982906

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.