Cited by 89Emotion and Mood RecognitionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBiometric Identification and Security

Reliable emotion recognition system based on dynamic adaptive fusion of forehead biopotentials and physiological signals

Khezri, Mahdi, Firoozabadi, Mohammad, Sharafat, Ahmad Reza·2015·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract

In this study, we proposed a new adaptive method for fusing multiple emotional modalities to improve the performance of the emotion recognition system. Three-channel forehead biosignals along with peripheral physiological measurements (blood volume pressure, skin conductance, and interbeat intervals) were utilized as emotional modalities. Six basic emotions, i.e., anger, sadness, fear, disgust, happiness, and surprise were elicited by displaying preselected video clips for each of the 25 participants in the experiment; the physiological signals were collected simultaneously. In our multimodal emotion recognition system, recorded signals with the formation of several classification units identified the emotions independently. Then the results were fused using the adaptive weighted linear model to produce the final result. Each classification unit is assigned a weight that is determined dynamically by considering the performance of the units during the testing phase and the training phase results. This dynamic weighting scheme enables the emotion recognition system to adapt itself to each new user. The results showed that the suggested method outperformed conventional fusion of the features and classification units using the majority voting method. In addition, a considerable improvement, compared to the systems that used the static weighting schemes for fusing classification units, was also shown. Using support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) classifiers, the overall classification accuracies of 84.7% and 80% were obtained in identifying the emotions, respectively. In addition, applying the forehead or physiological signals in the proposed scheme indicates that designing a reliable emotion recognition system is feasible without the need for additional emotional modalities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.07.006

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies found general recognition rates from 57.77% to 85.46% for different emotional states.

    “Previous studies have provided evidence for general recognition rate from 57,77% to 85,46% for different emotional states”

    From Survey on AI-Based Multimodal Methods for Emotion Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [64]

  • A larger set of analyzed signals and more recognized emotions provides better results.

    “that more higher set of analyzed signals and more recognized emotions provides better results [64][65][66].”

    From Survey on AI-Based Multimodal Methods for Emotion Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khezri, M., Firoozabadi, M., & Sharafat, A. R.
Affiliations
Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
Corresponding author
Khezri, Mahdi
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
122
Issue
2
Pages
149-164
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130175312
Cited by
89
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
15.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
emotion recognition, multimodal fusion, adaptive weighted fusion, physiological signals, skin conductance, RR interval, basic emotions
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Blood Pressure, Emotions, Female, Forehead, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review