Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 791

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages

Bhattacherjee, A.·2000·IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans

Abstract

This paper examines human motivations underlying individual acceptance of business-to-consumer (B2C) electronic commerce services. Such acceptance is the key to the survival of firms in this intensely competitive industry. A modified theory of planned behavior (TPB) is used to hypothesize a model of e-commerce service acceptance, which is then tested using a field survey of 172 e-brokerage users. We found TPB was useful in explaining e-commerce service acceptance, however, acceptance motivations were significantly different from that of typical IS products. Based on a broader conceptualization of TPB's subjective norm to include both external (mass-media) and interpersonal influences, we report that subjective norm is an important predictor of e-commerce acceptance, behavioral control has minimal impact on e-commerce acceptance, and external influence is a significant determinant of subjective norm. Implications of these findings in light of e-commerce research and practice are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/3468.852435

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1086/208570 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0737-6782(88)90032-X · DOI
  3. 1998, why do people choose isp's and why do they drop them, Inteco Corp Press Rep
  4. 10.2307/249751 · DOI · Paper page
  5. nunnally, 1978, Psychometric Theory
  6. porter, 1968, Managerial Attitudes and Performance
  7. rogers, 1995, Diffusion of Innovations
  8. silicon investor, 1999, Silicon investor user profile
  9. 10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI · Paper page
  10. bentler, 1989, EQS Structural Equations Program Manual
  11. business wire, 1999, Online investing market grows by 73% in 1998 Online investors expect impact to be felt by full service and discount firms
  12. 10.1287/isre.1.2.115 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
  14. fornell, 1982, a comparative analysis of two structural equation models: lisrel and pls applied to market data, A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis
  15. watson, 2000, Electronic Commerce The Strategic Perspective
  16. xia, 1996, interdependencies between the determinants of user interaction and usage: an empirical test, Proc ICIS, 1

Cited by

See all 791

Metadata

Authors
Bhattacherjee, A.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans
Published
2000-07
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
411-420
ISSN
1083-4427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141268236
Cited by
791
References
5
FWCI
20.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.