The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners
Abstract
In the boreal forest zone and in many forest areas, there exist gaps between the forest crowns. For example, in Finland, more than 30% of the first pulse data of laser scanning reflect directly from the ground without any interaction with the canopy. By increasing the number of pulses, it is possible to have samples from each individual tree and also from the gaps between the trees. Basically, this means that several laser pulses can be recorded per m/sup 2/. This allows detailed investigation of forest areas and the creation of a three-dimensional (3D) tree height model. Tree height model can be calculated from the digital terrain and crown models both obtained with the laser scanner data. By analyzing the 3D tree height model by using image vision methods, e.g., segmentation, it is possible to locate individual trees, estimate individual tree heights, crown area, and, by using that data, to derive the stem diameter, number of stems, basal area, and stem volume. The advantage of the method is the capability to measure directly physical dimensions from the trees and use that information to calculate the needed stand attributes. This paper demonstrates for the first time that it is possible to accurately estimate standwise forest attributes, especially stem volume (biomass), using high-pulse-rate laser scanners to provide data, from which individual trees can be detected and characteristics of trees such as height, location, and crown dimensions can be determined. That information can be applied to provide estimates for larger areas (stands). Using the new method, the following standard errors were demonstrated for mean height, basal area and stem volume: 1.8 m (9.9%), 2.0 m/sup 2//ha (10.2%), and 18.5 m/sup 3//ha (10.5%), respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Morsdorf, F., Kötz, B., Meier, E., Itten, K. I., & Allgöwer, B. (2006) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.04.019 · Cited by 470
Generating pit-free canopy height models from airborne lidar
Khosravipour, A., Skidmore, A. K., Isenburg, M., Wang, T., & Hussin, Y. A. (2014) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · doi:10.14358/pers.80.9.863 · Cited by 347
Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis
Leckie, D., Gougeon, F., Hill, D., Quinn, R., Armstrong, L., & Shreenan, R. (2003) · Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.5589/m03-024 · Cited by 331
Prediction of understory vegetation cover with airborne lidar in an interior ponderosa pine forest
Wing, B. M., Ritchie, M. W., Boston, K., Cohen, W. B., Gitelman, A., & Olsen, M. J. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.024 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyyppa, J., Kelle, O., Lehikoinen, M., & Inkinen, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 969-975
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161746820
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/36.921414
- The paper
- Hyyppa, J., Kelle, O., Lehikoinen, M., & Inkinen, M. (2001). A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.921414
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.