Cited by 348AI in cancer detectionLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Artificial convolution neural network techniques and applications for lung nodule detection

Lo, S.-C.B., Lou, S.-L.A., Jyh-Shyan Lin, Freedman, M.T., Chien, M.V., Mun, S.K.·1995·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

We have developed a double-matching method and an artificial visual neural network technique for lung nodule detection. This neural network technique is generally applicable to the recognition of medical image pattern in gray scale imaging. The structure of the artificial neural net is a simplified network structure of human vision. The fundamental operation of the artificial neural network is local two-dimensional convolution rather than full connection with weighted multiplication. Weighting coefficients of the convolution kernels are formed by the neural network through backpropagated training. In addition, we modeled radiologists' reading procedures in order to instruct the artificial neural network to recognize the image patterns predefined and those of interest to experts in radiology. We have tested this method for lung nodule detection. The performance studies have shown the potential use of this technique in a clinical setting. This program first performed an initial nodule search with high sensitivity in detecting round objects using a sphere template double-matching technique. The artificial convolution neural network acted as a final classifier to determine whether the suspected image block contains a lung nodule. The total processing time for the automatic detection of lung nodules using both prescan and convolution neural network evaluation was about 15 seconds in a DEC Alpha workstation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/42.476112

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A CNN was used for lung nodule detection in chest x-rays as early as 1995.

    “One of the earliest applications of convolutional neural networks (CNN, the currently most common form of deep learning) has appeared as early as 1995, where a CNN was used for lung nodule detection in chest x-rays [100].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lo, S.-C. B., Lou, S.-L. A., Lin, J.-S., Freedman, M. T., Chien, M. V., & Mun, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
1995
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
711-718
ISSN
0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161113826
Cited by
348
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
lung nodule detection, convolutional neural networks, gray-scale imaging, computer-aided diagnosis, nodule classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review