NiftyNet: a deep-learning platform for medical imaging
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medical image analysis and computer-assisted intervention problems are increasingly being addressed with deep-learning-based solutions. Established deep-learning platforms are flexible but do not provide specific functionality for medical image analysis and adapting them for this domain of application requires substantial implementation effort. Consequently, there has been substantial duplication of effort and incompatible infrastructure developed across many research groups. This work presents the open-source NiftyNet platform for deep learning in medical imaging. The ambition of NiftyNet is to accelerate and simplify the development of these solutions, and to provide a common mechanism for disseminating research outputs for the community to use, adapt and build upon. METHODS: The NiftyNet infrastructure provides a modular deep-learning pipeline for a range of medical imaging applications including segmentation, regression, image generation and representation learning applications. Components of the NiftyNet pipeline including data loading, data augmentation, network architectures, loss functions and evaluation metrics are tailored to, and take advantage of, the idiosyncracies of medical image analysis and computer-assisted intervention. NiftyNet is built on the TensorFlow framework and supports features such as TensorBoard visualization of 2D and 3D images and computational graphs by default. RESULTS: We present three illustrative medical image analysis applications built using NiftyNet infrastructure: (1) segmentation of multiple abdominal organs from computed tomography; (2) image regression to predict computed tomography attenuation maps from brain magnetic resonance images; and (3) generation of simulated ultrasound images for specified anatomical poses. CONCLUSIONS: The NiftyNet infrastructure enables researchers to rapidly develop and distribute deep learning solutions for segmentation, regression, image generation and representation learning applications, or extend the platform to new applications.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
NiftyNet is an open-source TensorFlow-based platform for deep learning in medical imaging, providing modular components for data loading, sampling, augmentation, networks, losses, evaluation, and a model zoo. The paper demonstrates it on abdominal CT segmentation, MRI-to-CT regression, and ultrasound simulation with a GAN.
Key findings
- NiftyNet supports image segmentation, image regression, image model representation via auto-encoders, and image generation via auto-encoders and GANs, with modular components intended to reduce duplicated infrastructure effort.
- In abdominal multi-organ CT segmentation using 90 CT scans and 9-fold cross-validation, median Dice scores ranged from 0.62 for duodenum to 0.95 for liver; other reported medians included spleen 0.94, left kidney 0.93, pancreas 0.75, and stomach 0.87.
- In MRI-to-CT regression with 5-fold cross-validation, NiftyNet achieved mean absolute error of 88 HU (S.D. 7.5), compared with 121 HU (17) for pCT and 203 HU (24) for UTE; mean error was 9.1 HU (12) for NiftyNet, −7.3 HU (23) for pCT, and −132 HU (34) for UTE.
- A pre-trained conditional GAN for ultrasound simulation was ported into the NiftyNet model zoo; interpolation results showed smooth variation in shadowing artifacts in one example and a sharp transition suggesting mode collapse in another.
Methods
- NiftyNet is built on TensorFlow and comprises modular components including an ApplicationDriver, Application classes, Reader, Sampler, Network, and output handlers, with configuration via command line or human-readable configuration files and a model zoo for network reuse.
- Three illustrative applications are presented: abdominal CT segmentation using DenseVNet, 90 CT scans, 9-fold cross-validation, 3000 iterations on whole images with ResizeSampler and random affine augmentation; MRI-to-CT regression using highresnet, 5-fold cross-validation, RMSE loss, 15,000 iterations on 80×80×80 patches with iSampler and random affine augmentation; and a conditional GAN for ultrasound simulation originally trained on 26,000 frames and ported via restore_initializer.
- Segmentation and regression metrics were computed using NiftyNet’s evaluation action and aggregated over folds; segmentation metrics included Dice score, relative volume difference, mean absolute distance, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance, while regression metrics included mean absolute error and mean error.
Limitations
- Stated: NiftyNet currently supports a simplified machine learning pipeline that trains a single network and relies on users for data partitioning and model selection, such as hyper-parameter tuning; built-in cross-validation and standardized hyper-parameter tuning are future work.
- Stated: the current model zoo contains a small number of models as proof of concept, and expanding it to state-of-the-art models for common tasks and public challenges is a future direction.
- Evident: the GAN example was ported from prior work and evaluated qualitatively, with the authors noting a sharp transition suggesting mode collapse; the illustrative applications are specific examples rather than broad benchmarking across tasks or datasets.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 11 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
NiftyNet's modular implementation facilitates adapting existing neural network architectures to new problems.
“A modular implementation of the typical medical imaging machine learning pipeline facilitates (1) warm starts with established pre-trained networks, (2) adapting existing neural network architectures to new problems, and (3) rapid prototyping of new solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
NiftyNet's modular implementation of the typical medical imaging machine learning pipeline facilitates warm starts with established pre-trained networks.
“A modular implementation of the typical medical imaging machine learning pipeline facilitates (1) warm starts with established pre-trained networks, (2) adapting existing neural network architectures to new problems, and (3) rapid prototyping of new solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
NiftyNet is an open-source platform implemented based on TensorFlow APIs for deep learning in medical imaging.
“An open-source platform is implemented based on TensorFlow APIs for deep learning in medical imaging domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
NiftyNet's modular implementation facilitates rapid prototyping of new solutions.
“A modular implementation of the typical medical imaging machine learning pipeline facilitates (1) warm starts with established pre-trained networks, (2) adapting existing neural network architectures to new problems, and (3) rapid prototyping of new solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
NiftyNet's conceptual blocks naturally encode a hierarchical structure for TensorBoard visualization.
“because these conceptual blocks are constructed hierarchically through the composition of Layer objects and scopes, they naturally encode a hierarchical structure for TensorBoard visualization”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The ported ultrasound simulation network, when evaluated using linear interpolation, showed a smooth transition between different levels of ultrasound shadowing artifacts for the same anatomy.
“The first shows the same anatomy, but a smooth transition between different levels of ultrasound shadowing artifacts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The NiftyNet platform provides implementations for data loading, data augmentation, network architectures, loss functions and evaluation metrics that are tailored for the idiosyncracies of medical image analysis and computer-assisted intervention.
“The NiftyNet platform provides implementations for data loading, data augmentation, network architectures, loss functions and evaluation metrics that are tailored for the idiosyncracies of medical image analysis and computer-assisted intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The NiftyNet method for synthetic CT generation from MRI achieved a lower mean absolute error (88 HU) than pCT (121 HU) and UTE (203 HU).
“| MAE | Average | 88 | 121 | 203 |”
- Also stated in: § Image regression · plain
“| | S.D | 7.5 | 17 | 24 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Image regression · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
The combination of high-resolution multi-dimensional data results in large data sizes for each sample, which impact computational and memory costs.
“The combination of these factors results in large data sizes for each sample, which impact computational and memory costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Data dimensionality encountered in medical image analysis and computer-assisted intervention typically ranges from 2D to 5D.
- Interpretationreasoning
Medical imaging specific data formats are typically not supported by existing deep learning frameworks, requiring custom infrastructure for loading images.
“These medical imaging specific data formats are typically not supported by existing deep learning frameworks, requiring custom infrastructure for loading images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The ported ultrasound simulation network, when evaluated using linear interpolation, showed a sharp transition in the interpolation, suggesting the presence of mode collapse.
“The second shows a sharp transition in the interpolation, suggesting the presence of mode collapse, a common issue in GANs [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] I. Goodfellow, NIPS 2016 tutorial: generative adversarial networks (2016). arXiv: 1701.00160v4.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The ultrasound simulation network was originally trained outside NiftyNet using 26,000 frames of optically tracked ultrasound to generate images of specified views of a fetal phantom.
“a conditional GAN network was trained to generate ultrasound images of specified views of a fetal phantom using 26,000 frames of optically tracked ultrasound.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Hu Y. Gibson E. Lee L.-L. Xie W. Barratt D.C. Vercauteren T. Noble J.A. Freehand ultrasound image simulation with spatially-conditioned generative adversarial networks Proceedings of MICCAI Workshop on Reconstruction and Analysis of Moving Body Organs (RAMBO) 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
NiftyNet's modular implementation of the typical medical imaging machine learning pipeline allows researchers to focus implementation effort on their specific innovations, while leveraging the work of others for the remaining pipeline.
“Our modular implementation of the typical medical imaging machine learning pipeline allows researchers to focus implementation effort on their specific innovations, while leveraging the work of others for the remaining pipeline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The flexible specification for the number, type and semantic meaning of inputs and outputs, encapsulated in the Sampler and Aggregator components, was motivated by the early inclusion of both image segmentation/regression and image generation.
“The early inclusion of both image segmentation/regression (mapping from images to images) and image generation (mapping from parameters to images) motivated a flexible specification for the number, type and semantic meaning of inputs and outputs, encapsulated in the Sampler and Aggregator components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The separation of ApplicationDriver logic from Application logic facilitated the rapid development of new application types.
“This facilitated the rapid development of new application types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Now that the DenseVNet architecture is incorporated into NiftyNet, the network and its conceptual blocks can be used in new segmentation problems with no code development using the command line interface.
“now that the DenseVNet architecture is incorporated into NiftyNet, the network and its conceptual blocks can be used in new segmentation problems with no code development using the command line interface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
- The quote only partly states this claim. 6
- May combine two claims. 21
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningThe NiftyNet platform comprises several modular components, including ApplicationDriver, Application, Reader, Sampler, Network, and output handlers.
“The NiftyNet platform comprises several modular components.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenNiftyNet supports easy installation via pip (pip install niftynet).
“The platform supports easy installation via the pip installation tool5 (i.e. pip install niftynet)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe NiftyNet platform comprises an implementation of common infrastructure and common networks used in medical imaging, a database of pre-trained networks, and tools to facilitate adaptation of deep learning research to new clinical applications.
“The NiftyNet platform comprises an implementation of the common infrastructure and common networks used in medical imaging, a database of pre-trained networks for specific applications and tools to facilitate the adaptation of deep learning research to new clinical applications with a shallow learning curve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningNiftyNet provides Network and Layer classes for constructing and reusing network architectures, with support for visualization via TensorBoard.
“In NiftyNet, these conceptual blocks are represented by encapsulated Layer classes, or inline using TensorFlow’s scoping system.”
- Also stated in: § Component details: networks and layers · plain
“This also enables automatic support for visualization of the network graph as a hierarchy at different levels of detail using the TensorBoard visualizer [37] as shown in Fig. 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] D. Mané, et al., TensorBoard: TensorFlow’s visualization toolkit, 2015, https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorboard.
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Component details: networks and layers · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe NiftyNet Dense V-network achieved median Dice scores for 8 abdominal organs in 9-fold cross-validation, with the lowest median Dice score for duodenum (0.62) and the highest for liver (0.95).
“Table 1 Median segmentation metrics for 8 organs aggregated over the 9-fold cross-validation.”
- Also stated in: § Abdominal organ segmentation · plain
“| Duodenum | 0.62 | 0.24 | 3.05 | 12.47 |”
- Also stated in: § Abdominal organ segmentation · plain
“| Liver | 0.95 | 0.02 | 1.42 | 4.12 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Abdominal organ segmentation · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningNiftyNet provides a Reader for loading medical image files and applying image-wide preprocessing, and a Sampler for generating data packets with augmentation.
“The Reader class is responsible for loading corresponding image files from medical file formats for a specified data set, and applying image-wide preprocessing.”
- Also stated in: § Component details: samplers and output handlers · plain
“Sampler objects generate a sequence of packets of corresponding data for processing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Component details: samplers and output handlers · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenNiftyNet provides data normalization and augmentation layers, including mean, variance, histogram normalization, and flip, rotation, scaling augmentation.
“NiftyNet currently supports mean, variance and histogram intensity data normalization, and flip, rotation and scaling spatial data augmentation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenNiftyNet provides analysis pipelines that can be run as part of the command line interface.
“provides analysis pipelines that can be run as part of the command line interface”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenNiftyNet releases encode the range of compatible versions of dependencies in a requirements.txt file, enabling automatic installation of compatible libraries for any NiftyNet version.
“the range of compatible versions of NiftyNet dependencies will be encoded in a requirements.txt file in the code repository enabling automatic installation of compatible libraries for any NiftyNet version”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningNiftyNet provides a model zoo and mechanisms for restoring, adapting, and reusing trained networks and conceptual blocks.
“NiftyNet provides several mechanisms to support the distribution and reuse of networks and conceptual blocks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenNiftyNet currently supports image segmentation, image regression, image model representation, and image generation, and is designed to support addition of new application types.
“NiftyNet currently supports •image segmentation,•image regression,•image model representation (via auto-encoder applications), and•image generation (via auto-encoder and generative adversarial networks (GANs)), and it is designed in a modular way to support the addition of new application types, by encapsulating typical application workflows in Application classes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationNiftyNet versions follow the semantic versioning 2.0 standard to ensure clear communication regarding backwards compatibility.
“NiftyNet versions will follow the semantic versioning 2.0 standard [45] to ensure clear communication regarding backwards compatibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] T. Preston-Werner, Semantic versioning, Technical Report, T. Preston-Werner, 2015. URL: http://semver.org/.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningNiftyNet provides a high-level deep learning pipeline with components optimized for medical imaging applications and specific interfaces for medical image segmentation, classification, regression, image generation and representation learning applications.
“NiftyNet provides a high-level deep learning pipeline with components optimized for medical imaging applications (data loading, sampling and augmentation, networks, loss functions, evaluations, and a model zoo) and specific interfaces for medical image segmentation, classification, regression, image generation and representation learning applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningNiftyNet provides output handlers for training (loss and optimizer) and inference (aggregation and postprocessing), and supports evaluation metrics for segmentation.
“During training, the output handler takes the network output, computes a loss and the gradient of the loss with respect to the trainable variables, and uses an Optimizer to iteratively train the model.”
- Also stated in: § Component details: samplers and output handlers · plain
“NiftyNet currently supports Aggregator objects for combining image patches, resizing images, and computing evaluation metrics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Component details: samplers and output handlers · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningNiftyNet's conceptual blocks map to a meaningful subgraph of the computation graph and all associated variables, meaning that all weights for a conceptual block can be loaded into a new model with a single scope reference.
“The scope of each conceptual blocks maps to a meaningful subgraph of the computation graph and all associated variables, meaning that all weights for a conceptual block can be loaded into a new model with a single scope reference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe NiftyNet DenseVNet network was trained using images in their original NIfTI medical image format and the resulting trained model was publicly deployed in the NiftyNet model zoo.
“The network was trained using images in their original NIfTI medical image format and the resulting trained model was publicly deployed in the NiftyNet model zoo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe NiftyNet platform is available from http://niftynet.io/.
“The NiftyNet platform is available from http://niftynet.io/.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThis work presents the open-source NiftyNet platform for deep learning in medical imaging.
“This work presents the open-source NiftyNet platform for deep learning in medical imaging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe NiftyNet source code can be accessed from the Git repository or installed as a Python library using pip install niftynet.
“The source code can be accessed from the Git repository6 or installed as a Python library using pip install niftynet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenNiftyNet is licensed under an open-source Apache 2.0 license.
“NiftyNet is licensed under an open-source Apache 2.0 license7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe NiftyNet method for synthetic CT generation from MRI achieved a mean error of 9.1 HU, compared to -7.3 HU for pCT and -132 HU for UTE.
“| ME | Average | 9.1 | −7.3 | −132 |”
- Also stated in: § Image regression · plain
“| | S.D. | 12 | 23 | 34 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Image regression · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningDifferent types of error may have very different clinical impacts, motivating specialized loss functions and evaluation metrics.
“Furthermore, different types of error may have very different clinical impacts, motivating specialized loss functions and evaluation metrics (e.g. spatially weighted segmentation metrics).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMuch of the infrastructure for deep learning pipelines is recreated by each researcher or research group, and much of it depends on the application domain being addressed.
“Much of this infrastructure is recreated by each researcher or research group undertaking a deep learning project, and much of it depends on the application domain being addressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There is substantial overlap in software pipelines implemented by many research groups.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGeneral purpose deep learning platforms are unable to provide specific functionality for medical image analysis, and adapting them for this domain requires substantial implementation effort.
“However, by avoiding assumptions about the application to remain general, the platforms are unable to provide specific functionality for medical image analysis and adapting them for this domain of application requires substantial implementation effort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Deep learning technology has limited support in current software infrastructure for medical image analysis and computer-assisted intervention.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationApplications in computer-assisted intervention where analysis results are used in real time have additional constraints on analysis latency.
“Applications in computer-assisted intervention where analysis results are used in real time (e.g. [21], [24]) have additional constraints on analysis latency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [21] Garcia-Peraza-Herrera L.C. Li W. Fidon L. Gruijthuijsen C. Devreker A. Attilakos G. Deprest J. Poorten E.V. Stoyanov D. Vercauteren T. Ourselin S. ToolNet: holistically-nested real-time segmentation of robotic surgical tools 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vancouver, BC 2017 5717 5722
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Gibson E. Robu M.R. Thompson S. Edwards P.E. Schneider C. Gurusamy K. Davidson B. Hawkes D.J. Barratt D.C. Clarkson M.J. Deep residual networks for automatic segmentation of laparoscopic videos of the liver Proceedings of the SPIE, Medical Imaging vol. 10135 2017 101351M
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe NiftyNet repository uses continuous integration incorporating system and unit tests for regression testing.
“The NiftyNet repository uses continuous integration incorporating system and unit tests for regression testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIndependent reimplementation of custom infrastructure results in substantial duplication of effort, poses a barrier to dissemination of research tools, and inhibits fair comparisons between competing methods.
“Independent reimplementation of all of this custom infrastructure results in substantial duplication of effort, poses a barrier to dissemination of research tools and inhibits fair comparisons between competing methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There is substantial overlap in software pipelines implemented by many research groups.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe pre-NiftyNet implementation was not conducive to distributing the code or the trained network, and lacked visualizations for monitoring segmentation performance during training.
“The pre-NiftyNet implementation was not conducive to distributing the code or the trained network, and lacked visualizations for monitoring segmentation performance during training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMedical image analysis differs from other domains where deep learning is applied due to characteristics of the data itself and the applications in which they are used.
“Medical image analysis differs from other domains where deep learning is applied due to characteristics of the data itself, and the applications in which they are used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeep learning has been applied to a wide range of medical image analysis tasks and anatomical sites.
“Recent reviews [34], [51] have highlighted that deep learning has been applied to a wide range of medical image analysis tasks (segmentation, classification, detection, registration, image reconstruction, enhancement, etc.) across a wide range of anatomical sites (brain, heart, lung, abdomen, breast, prostate, musculature, etc.).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34] Litjens G. Kooi T. Bejnordi B.E. Setio A.A.A. Ciompi F. Ghafoorian M. van der Laak J.A.W.M. van Ginneken B. Sánchez C.I. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis Medical Image Analysis 42 2017 60 88 28778026 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [51] Shen D. Wu G. Suk H.-I. Deep learning in medical image analysis Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 19 2017 221 248 28301734 PMC5479722 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningMedical image analysis must deal with large class imbalances, motivating special loss functions.
“Because small image features can have large clinical importance, and because some pathology is very rare but life-threatening, medical image analysis must deal with large class imbalances, motivating special loss functions [18], [40], [53].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] L. Fidon, W. Li, L.C. Garcia-Peraza-Herrera, J. Ekanayake, N. Kitchen, S. Ourselin, T. Vercauteren, Generalised Wasserstein Dice score for imbalanced multi-class segmentation using holistic convolutional networks, (2017). arXiv: 1707.00478.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Milletari F. Navab N. Ahmadi S.-A. V-Net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) 2016 565 571
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] Sudre C.H. Li W. Vercauteren T. Ourselin S. Cardoso M.J. Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations Proceedings of MICCAI Workshop on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis (DLMIA) 2017 PMC7610921 34104926
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningUsing smaller data sets increases the importance of data augmentation, regularization, and cross-validation to prevent over-fitting.
“Using smaller data sets increases the importance of data augmentation, regularization, and cross-validation to prevent over-fitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Typical medical image data sets remain small.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe choice of TensorFlow for NiftyNet reflects engineering concerns (cross-platform support, multi-GPU support, built-in visualization, installation without compilation, semantic versioning) and pragmatic concerns (larger number of users, industry support).
“The choice of the TensorFlow framework over the many deep learning frameworks described above reflects both engineering concerns – including cross-platform support, multi-GPU support, built-in visualization tools, installation without compilation, and semantic versioning – as well as pragmatic concerns, such as its larger number of users and support from industry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNiftyNet infrastructure enables researchers to rapidly develop deep learning solutions for segmentation, regression, image generation and representation learning applications, or extend the platform to new applications.
“This infrastructure enables researchers to rapidly develop deep learning solutions for segmentation, regression, image generation and representation learning applications, or extend the platform to new applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNiftyNet's named conceptual blocks simplified the adaptation of weights from pre-trained models and the TensorBoard-based hierarchical visualization of the computation graphs.
“NiftyNet’s named conceptual blocks also simplified the adaptation of weights from pre-trained models and the TensorBoard-based hierarchical visualization of the computation graphs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Deep learning usage in medical image analysis has increased by orders of magnitude in the last five years.
“their usage has increased by orders of magnitude in the last five years.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is substantial overlap in software pipelines implemented by many research groups.
“there is substantial overlap in software pipelines implemented by many research groups.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Deep learning technology has limited support in current software infrastructure for medical image analysis and computer-assisted intervention.
“deep learning technology has limited support in current software infrastructure for medical image analysis and computer-assisted intervention.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Data dimensionality encountered in medical image analysis and computer-assisted intervention typically ranges from 2D to 5D.
“Data dimensionality encountered in medical image analysis and computer-assisted intervention typically ranges from 2D to 5D.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Typical medical image data sets remain small.
“typical data sets remain small.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Classification is described as both supported and under development
MajorThe platform description says NiftyNet provides a specific interface for classification applications, whereas the future-direction section places image classification among applications still under development.
“specific interfaces for medical image segmentation, classification, regression, image generation and representation learning applications.”
“Future applications under development include image classification, registration, and enhancement (e.g. super-resolution) as well as pathology detection.”
Organ list omits gallbladder and repeats stomach
MinorThe text names seven distinct organs, listing stomach twice and omitting gallbladder. Table 1 instead reports results for eight distinct organs, including gallbladder.
“the gastrointestinal tract (esophagus, stomach and duodenum), the pancreas, and anatomical landmark organs (liver, left kidney, spleen and stomach).”
“| Gallbladder | 0.79 | 0.17 | 1.55 | 4.41 |”
Cites
(1994) · Cited by 21,711 · see citing works
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332 · see citing works
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29
Teymur, O., Zygalakis, K., & Calderhead, B. (2016) · Cited by 13,881 · see citing works
Layer NormalizationPreprint
Ba, J., Kiros, J., & Hinton, G. E. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06450 · Cited by 13,745 · see citing works
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P. R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D. E., et al. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · Cited by 13,630 · see citing works
V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation
Milletari, F., Navab, N., & Ahmadi, S.-A. (2016) · 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2016.79 · Cited by 11,931 · see citing works
Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding
Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., Guadarrama, S., & Darrell, T. (2014) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/2647868.2654889 · Cited by 11,077 · see citing works
Cortical Surface-Based Analysis
Dale, A. M., Fischl, B., & Sereno, M. I. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 · Cited by 10,910 · see citing works
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408 · see citing works
Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets
Mirza, M., & Osindero, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1784 · Cited by 8,863 · see citing works
3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation
Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S. S., Brox, T., & Ronneberger, O. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49 · Cited by 7,945 · see citing works
The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS)
Menze, B. H., Jakab, A., Bauer, S., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Farahani, K., Kirby, J., Burren, Y., Porz, N., Slotboom, J., Wiest, R., et al. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2014.2377694 · Cited by 6,781 · see citing works
Cortical Surface-Based Analysis
Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I., & Dale, A. M. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0396 · Cited by 6,147 · see citing works
Deep learning in medical image analysis
Shen, D., Wu, G., & Suk, H.-I. (2017) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442 · Cited by 4,968 · see citing works
A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration
Avants, B. B., Tustison, N. J., Song, G., Cook, P. A., Klein, A., & Gee, J. C. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 · Cited by 4,796 · see citing works
Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature EmbeddingPreprint
Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., Guadarrama, S., & Darrell, T. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1408.5093 · Cited by 4,748 · see citing works
Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration
Klein, S., Staring, M., Murphy, K., Viergever, M. A., & Pluim, J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2009.2035616 · Cited by 4,311 · see citing works
Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation
Kamnitsas, K., Ledig, C., Newcombe, V. F. J., Simpson, J. P., Kane, A. D., Menon, D. K., Rueckert, D., & Glocker, B. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004 · Cited by 3,498 · see citing works
Generalised Dice Overlap as a Deep Learning Loss Function for Highly Unbalanced Segmentations
Sudre, C. H., Li, W., Vercauteren, T., Ourselin, S., & Jorge Cardoso, M. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67558-9_28 · Cited by 2,829 · see citing works
Self-citationMatConvNet: Convolutional Neural Networks for MATLAB
Vedaldi, A., & Lenc, K. (2015) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/2733373.2807412 · Cited by 2,444 · see citing works
Weight Normalization: A Simple Reparameterization to Accelerate Training of Deep Neural NetworksPreprint
Salimans, T., & Kingma, D. P. (2016) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.07868 · Cited by 2,284 · see citing works
NIPS 2016 Tutorial: Generative Adversarial NetworksPreprint
Goodfellow, I. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.00160 · Cited by 1,735 · see citing works
cuDNN: Efficient Primitives for Deep LearningPreprint
Chetlur, S., Woolley, C., Vandermersch, P., Cohen, J., Tran, J. J., Catanzaro, B., & Shelhamer, E. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1410.0759 · Cited by 1,394 · see citing works
Morgan, M. C. (2025) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17575540 · Cited by 1,375 · see citing works
Torch7: A Matlab-like Environment for Machine Learning
Collobert, R., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Farabet, C. (2011) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 1,241 · see citing works
Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units
Marc Modat, A., Ridgway, G. R., Taylor, Z. A., Lehmann, M., Barnes, J., Hawkes, D. J., Fox, N. C., & Sebastien Ourselin, A. (2009) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.09.002 · Cited by 1,087 · see citing works
Theano: new features and speed improvements
Bastien, F., Lamblin, P., Pascanu, R., Bergstra, J., Goodfellow, I., Bergeron, A., Bouchard, N., Warde-Farley, D., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.5590 · Cited by 1,005 · see citing works
MatConvNet - Convolutional Neural Networks for MATLAB
Vedaldi, A., & Lenc, K. (2014) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.4564 · Cited by 856 · see citing works
Lowekamp, B., Chen, D. T., Ibáñez, L., & Blezek, D. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00045 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Automatic Multi-Organ Segmentation on Abdominal CT With Dense V-Networks
Gibson, E., Giganti, F., Hu, Y., Bonmati, E., Bandula, S., Gurusamy, K. S., Davidson, B. R., Pereira, S. P., Clarkson, M. J., & Barratt, D. C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2806309 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Self-citationWeight normalization: a simple reparameterization to accelerate training of deep neural networks
Salimans, T., & Kingma, D. P. (2016) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Roth, H. R., Lu, L., Seff, A., Cherry, K. M., Hoffman, J., Wang, S.-J., Liu, J., Turkbey, E., & Summers, R. (2014) · International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10404-1_65 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Cascaded Anisotropic Convolutional Neural Networks
Wang, G., Li, W., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_16 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Self-citationDeepIGeoS: A Deep Interactive Geodesic Framework for Medical Image Segmentation
Wang, G., Zuluaga, M. A., Li, W., Pratt, R., Patel, P. A., Aertsen, M., Doel, T., David, A. L., Deprest, J., Ourselin, S., et al. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2840695 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Self-citationBatch Renormalization: Towards Reducing Minibatch Dependence in Batch-Normalized ModelsPreprint
Ioffe, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.03275 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit: challenges and advances
Nolden, M., Zelzer, S., Seitel, A., Wald, D., Müller, M., Franz, A. M., Maleike, D., Fangerau, M., Baumhauer, M., Maier‐Hein, L., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-013-0840-8 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
CNTK: Microsoft's Open-Source Deep-Learning Toolkit
Seide, F., & Agarwal, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2945397 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Attenuation Correction Synthesis for Hybrid PET-MR Scanners: Application to Brain Studies
Burgos, N., Cardoso, M. J., Thielemans, K., Marc Modat, A., Pedemonte, S., Dickson, J. C., Barnes, A., Ahmed, R. M., Mahoney, C., Schott, J. M., et al. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2014.2340135 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial convolution neural network techniques and applications for lung nodule detection
Lo, S.-C. B., Lou, S.-L. A., Lin, J.-S., Freedman, M. T., Chien, M. V., & Mun, S. K. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.476112 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Li, W., Wang, G., Fidon, L., Sebastien Ourselin, A., Cardoso, M. J., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_28 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Self-citationDieleman, S., Schlüter, J., Raffel, C., Olson, E. M., Sønderby, S. K., Nouri, D., Maturana, D., Thoma, M., Battenberg, E., Kelly, J., et al. (2015) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.27878 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Pieper, S. D., Lorensen, B., Schroeder, W. J., & Kikinis, R. (2006) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2006.1625012 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Segmentation Outside the Cranial Vault Challenge
harrigr (2015) · Synapse · doi:10.7303/syn3193805 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Markiewicz, C. J., Brett, M., Hanke, M., Côté, M.-A., Cipollini, B., McCarthy, P., Orfanos, D. P., Jarecka, D., Cheng, C. P., Larson, E., et al. (2010) · Figshare · doi:10.5281/zenodo.591597 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Fidon, L., Li, W., García-Peraza-Herrera, L. C., Ekanayake, J., Kitchen, N. D., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_6 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationToolNet: Holistically-nested real-time segmentation of robotic surgical tools
Garcia-Peraza-Herrera, L. C., Li, W., Fidon, L., Gruijthuijsen, C., Devreker, A., Attilakos, G., Deprest, J., Poorten, E. V., Stoyanov, D., Vercauteren, T., et al. (2017) · 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8206462 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citationToolNet: Holistically-Nested Real-Time Segmentation of Robotic Surgical ToolsPreprint
García-Peraza-Herrera, L. C., Li, W., Fidon, L., Gruijthuijsen, C., Devreker, A., Attilakos, G., Deprest, J. A., Poorten, E., Stoyanov, D. V., Vercauteren, T. K., et al. (2017) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationZhou, X., Ito, T., Takayama, R., Wang, S., Hara, T., & Fujita, H. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8_12 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Freehand Ultrasound Image Simulation with Spatially-Conditioned Generative Adversarial Networks
Hu, Y., Gibson, E., Lee, L.-L., Xie, W., Barratt, D. C., Vercauteren, T. K., & Noble, J. A. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67564-0_11 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationNiftySim: A GPU-based nonlinear finite element package for simulation of soft tissue biomechanics
Johnsen, S., Taylor, Z. A., Clarkson, M. J., Hipwell, J. H., Marc Modat, A., Eiben, B., Han, L., Hu, Y., Mertzanidou, T., Hawkes, D. J., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-014-1118-5 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationGIFT-Cloud: A data sharing and collaboration platform for medical imaging research
Doel, T., Shakir, D. I., Pratt, R., Aertsen, M., Moggridge, J. C., Bellon, E., David, A. L., Deprest, J. A., Vercauteren, T. K., & Sebastien Ourselin, A. (2016) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.11.004 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationGibson, E., Giganti, F., Hu, Y., Bonmati, E., Bandula, S., Gurusamy, K. S., Davidson, B. R., Pereira, S. P., Clarkson, M. J., & Barratt, D. C. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_83 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationClarkson, M. J., Zombori, G., Thompson, S., Totz, J., Song, Y., Espak, M., Johnsen, S., Hawkes, D. J., & Sebastien Ourselin, A. (2014) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-014-1124-7 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
DeepInfer: open-source deep learning deployment toolkit for image-guided therapy
Mehrtash, A., Pesteie, M., Hetherington, J., Behringer, P. A., Kapur, T., Wells, W. M., Rohling, R. N., Fedorov, A., & Abolmaesumi, P. (2017) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2256011 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Deep residual networks for automatic segmentation of laparoscopic videos of the liver
Gibson, E., Robu, M., Thompson, S., Edwards, P., Schneider, C., Gurusamy, K. S., Davidson, B. R., Hawkes, D. J., Barratt, D. C., & Clarkson, M. J. (2017) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2255975 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationTensorLayer: A Versatile Library for Efficient Deep Learning DevelopmentPreprint
Dong, H., Supratak, A., Mai, L., Liu, F., Oehmichen, A., Yu, S., & Guo, Y. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.08551 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Berger, L. U., Hyde, E., Cardoso, M. J., & Sebastien Ourselin, A. (2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95921-4_26 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationFidon, L., Li, W.-Z., García-Peraza-Herrera, L., et al. (2017) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.00478 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationBrett, M., Hanke, M., Cipollini, B., et al. (2016) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.60808 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI
Lundervold, A. S., & Lundervold, A. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.002 · Cited by 2,058 · see citing works
Deep Learning Applications in Medical Image Analysis
Ker, J., Wang, L., Rao, J. P., & Lim, C. C. T. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2788044 · Cited by 1,521 · see citing works
Transformers in medical imaging: A survey
Shamshad, F., Khan, S., Zamir, S. W., Khan, M. H., Hayat, M., Khan, F. S., & Fu, H. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102802 · Cited by 1,412 · see citing works
Recent advances and clinical applications of deep learning in medical image analysis
Chen, X., Wang, X., Zhang, K., Fung, K.-M. A., Thai, T., Moore, K. N., Mannel, R. S., Liu, H., Zheng, B., & Qiu, Y. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102444 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI
Lundervold, A. S., & Lundervold, A. (2018) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 1,012 · see citing works
CHAOS Challenge - combined (CT-MR) healthy abdominal organ segmentation
Kavur, A. E., Gezer, N. S., BARIŞ, M. M., Aslan, S., Conze, P.-H., Groza, V., Pham, D. D., Chatterjee, S., Ernst, P., Özkan, S., et al. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101950 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
AI applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning
Castiglioni, I., Rundo, L., Codari, M., Leo, G. D., Salvatore, C., Interlenghi, M., Gallivanone, F., Cozzi, A., D’Amico, N. C., & Sardanelli, F. (2021) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Wang, G., Li, W., Aertsen, M., Deprest, J., Ourselin, S., & Vercauteren, T. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.103 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Self-citationPérez‐García, F., Sparks, R. E., & Sebastien Ourselin, A. (2021) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106236 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Cascaded Anisotropic Convolutional Neural Networks
Wang, G., Li, W., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_16 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Self-citationGANs for medical image analysis
Kazeminia, S., Baur, C., Kuijper, A., van Ginneken, B., Navab, N., Albarqouni, S., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101938 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Real-world data: A brief review of the methods, applications, challenges and opportunities
Liu, F., & Panagiotakos, D. (2022) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01768-6 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Skin lesion segmentation in dermoscopy images via deep full resolution convolutional networks
Al‐masni, M. A., Al–antari, M. A., Choi, M., Han, S., & Kim, T. (2018) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.05.027 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
Weakly-supervised convolutional neural networks for multimodal image registration
Hu, Y., Marc Modat, A., Gibson, E., Li, W., Ghavami, N., Bonmati, E., Wang, G., Bandula, S., Moore, C. M., Emberton, M., et al. (2018) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2018.07.002 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Self-citationCardenas, C. E., Yang, J., Anderson, B., Court, L. E., & Brock, K. (2019) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.001 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Deep and machine learning techniques for medical imaging-based breast cancer: A comprehensive review
Houssein, E. H., Emam, M. M., Ali, A. A., & Suganthan, P. N. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114161 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Data Augmentation for Brain-Tumor Segmentation: A Review
Nalepa, J., Marcinkiewicz, M., & Kawulok, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2019.00083 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Zhou, Z., Sodha, V., Pang, J., Gotway, M. B., & Liang, J. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101840 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Ebner, M., Wang, G., Li, W., Aertsen, M., Patel, P. A., Aughwane, R., Melbourne, A., Doel, T., Dymarkowski, S., Coppi, P. D., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116324 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Self-citationA review of deep learning based methods for medical image multi-organ segmentation
Fu, Y., Lei, Y., Wang, T., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., & Yang, X. (2021) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.003 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Wang, G., Li, W., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2019) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2019.00056 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Self-citationHead and neck tumor segmentation in PET/CT: The HECKTOR challenge
Oreiller, V., Andrearczyk, V., Jreige, M., Boughdad, S., Elhalawani, H., Castelli, J., Vallières, M., Zhu, S.-M., Xie, J.-Y., Peng, Y.-J., et al. (2021) · Medical Image Anal. · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102336 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Bakkouri, I., & Afdel, K. (2019) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-019-07988-1 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Deep learning for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: A survey
Khojaste-Sarakhsi, M., Haghighi, S. S., Ghomi, S. M. T. F., & Marchiori, E. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102332 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Efficient Brain Tumor Segmentation With Multiscale Two-Pathway-Group Conventional Neural Networks
Razzak, I., Imran, M. A., & Xu, G. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2018.2874033 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Deep learning in generating radiology reports: A survey
Monshi, M. M. A., Poon, J., & Chung, Y. Y. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101878 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Test-Time Augmentation
Wang, G., Li, W., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11726-9_6 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationA modified deep convolutional neural network for abnormal brain image classification
Hemanth, D. J., Anitha, J., Naaji, A., Geman, O., Popescu, D. E., & Hoang Son, L. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2885639 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Classification of Mammogram Images Using Multiscale all Convolutional Neural Network (MA-CNN)
Agnes, S. A., Anitha, J., Pandian, S. I. A., & Peter, J. D. (2019) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-019-1494-z · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Automated glioma grading on conventional MRI images using deep convolutional neural networks
Zhuge, Y., Ning, H., Mathen, P., Cheng, J. Y., Krauze, A. V., Camphausen, K. A., & Miller, R. W. (2020) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.14168 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Fidon, L., Li, W., García-Peraza-Herrera, L. C., Ekanayake, J., Kitchen, N. D., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_6 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent and Emerging Trends in Medical Image Segmentation With Deep Learning
Conze, P.-H., Andrade-Miranda, G. X., Singh, V. K., Jaouen, V., & Visvikis, D. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences · doi:10.1109/trpms.2023.3265863 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Izard, S. G., Torres, R. S., Plaza, Ó. A., Méndez, J. A. J., & García‐Peñalvo, F. J. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102962 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Label-driven weakly-supervised learning for multimodal deformarle image registration
Hu, Y., Marc Modat, A., Gibson, E., Ghavami, N., Bonmati, E., Moore, C. M., Emberton, M., Noble, J. A., Barratt, D. C., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2018) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2018.8363756 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationRafi, M., JianMing, Z., & Ahmad, K. (2019) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-07-2019-0049 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Haghighi, F., Taher, M. R. H., Zhou, Z., Gotway, M. B., & Liang, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3060634 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Müller, D., & Kramer, F. (2019) · BMC Medical Imaging · doi:10.1186/s12880-020-00543-7 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Rosa, F. L., Abdulkadir, A., Fartaria, M. J., Rahmanzadeh, R., Lu, P., Galbusera, R., Baraković, M., Thiran, J., Granziera, C., & Cuadra, M. B. (2020) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102335 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Hetero-Modal Variational Encoder-Decoder for Joint Modality Completion and Segmentation
Dorent, R., Joutard, S., Modat, M., Ourselin, S., & Vercauteren, T. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32245-8_9 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationCAI4CAI: The Rise of Contextual Artificial Intelligence in Computer Assisted Interventions
Vercauteren, T., Unberath, M., Padoy, N., & Navab, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2946993 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationKhalifa, N. E. M., Taha, M. H. N., Ezzat, D., Słowik, A., & Hassanien, A. E. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970210 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Soltanian-Zadeh, S., Sahingur, K., Blau, S., Gong, Y., & Farsiu, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1812995116 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Shapey, J., Wang, G., Dorent, R., Dimitriadis, A., Li, W., Paddick, I., Kitchen, N. D., Bisdas, S., Saeed, S. R., Sebastien Ourselin, A., et al. (2019) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2019.9.jns191949 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationDeepDose: Towards a fast dose calculation engine for radiation therapy using deep learning
Kontaxis, C., Bol, G. H., Lagendijk, J. J. W., & Raaymakers, B. W. (2020) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab7630 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Deep‐Learning Detection of Cancer Metastases to the Brain on MRI
Zhang, M., Young, G. S., Chen, H., Li, J., Qin, L., McFaline-Figueroa, J. R., Reardon, D. A., Cao, X., Wu, X., & Xu, X. (2020) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.27129 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Mahmood, T., Li, J., Pei, Y., Akhtar, F., Rehman, M. U., & Wasti, S. H. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263126 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Automated hippocampal unfolding for morphometry and subfield segmentation with HippUnfold
DeKraker, J., Haast, R. A. M., Yousif, M. D., Karat, B. G., Lau, J. C., Köhler, S., & KHAN, A. R. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.77945 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Avoiding a replication crisis in deep-learning-based bioimage analysis
Laine, R. F., Arganda‐Carreras, I., Henriques, R., & Jacquemet, G. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01284-3 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Reinventing 2D Convolutions for 3D Images
Yang, J., Huang, X., He, Y., Xu, J., Yang, C., Xu, G., & Ni, B.-B. (2019) · IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2021.3049452 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Chen, J., Ding, L., Viana, M. P., Lee, H., Sluezwski, M. F., Morris, B., Hendershott, M. C., Yang, R., Mueller, I. A., & Rafelski, S. M. (2018) · doi:10.1101/491035 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-attention convolutional neural network for improved MR image reconstruction
Wu, Y., Ma, Y., Liu, J., Du, J., & Xing, L. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.03.080 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Healthcare Techniques Through Deep Learning: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities
Nisar, D.-E.-M., Amin, R., Shah, N.-U.-H., Ghamdi, M. A. A., Almotiri, S. H., & Alruily, M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3095312 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Duffy, B. A., Zhao, L., Sepehrband, F., Min, J., Wang, D. J. J., Shi, Y., Toga, A. W., & Kim, H. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117756 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
ExAID: A multimodal explanation framework for computer-aided diagnosis of skin lesions
Lucieri, A., Bajwa, M. N., Braun, S. A., Malik, M. I., Dengel, A. R., & Ahmed, S. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106620 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging: Potentials and Limitations
Mendelson, E. B. (2018) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.18.20532 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Shiri, I., Arabi, H., Geramifar, P., Hajianfar, G., Ghafarian, P., Rahmim, A., Ay, M. R., & Zaidi, H. (2020) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-020-04852-5 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Epileptic seizure prediction using scalp electroencephalogram signals
Usman, S. M., Khalid, S., & Bashir, Z. I. (2021) · Journal of Applied Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2021.01.001 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Improving Data Augmentation for Medical Image Segmentation
Eaton-Rosen, Z., Bragman, F., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Cardoso, M. J. (2018) · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent advances in medical image processing for the evaluation of chronic kidney disease
Alnazer, I., Bourdon, P., Urruty, T., Falou, O., Khalil, M. A., Shahin, A. M., & Fernández-Maloigne, C. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.101960 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Dash, M., Londhe, N. D., Ghosh, S., Semwal, A., & Sonawane, R. S. (2019) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2019.04.002 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
CSNet: A new DeepNet framework for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation
Kumar, A., Upadhyay, N., Ghosal, P., Chowdhury, T., Das, D., Mukherjee, A., & Nandi, D. (2020) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105524 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Perdómo, O., Ríos, H. A., Rodriguez, F. J., Otálora, S., Mériaudeau, F., Müller, H., & Gonzalez, F. A. (2019) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.06.016 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Ultrasound Medical Imaging Techniques
Avola, D., Cinque, L., Fagioli, A., Foresti, G. L., & Mecca, A. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3447243 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Radak, M., Lafta, H. Y., & Fallahi, H. (2023) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-023-04956-z · Cited by 94 · see citing works
AI‐organoid integrated systems for biomedical studies and applications
Maramraju, S., Kowalczewski, A. C., Kaza, A., Liu, X., Singaraju, J. P., Albert, M. V., Ma, Z., & Yang, H. (2024) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10641 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Orlando, N., Gillies, D. J., Gyacskov, I., Romagnoli, C., D'Souza, D. P., & Fenster, A. (2020) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.14134 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Le, N. Q. K., Huỳnh, T.-T., Yapp, E. K. Y., & Yeh, H. (2019) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.016 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Fehling, M. K., Grosch, F., Schuster, M. E., Schick, B., & Lohscheller, J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227791 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Glioma Tumor Grade Identification Using Artificial Intelligent Techniques
Ahammed Muneer, K., V, Rajendran, V. R., & Paul Joseph, K. (2019) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-019-1228-2 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Shiri, I., Sabet, K. A., Arabi, H., Pourkeshavarz, M., Teimourian, B., Ay, M. R., & Zaidi, H. (2020) · Journal of Nuclear Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s12350-020-02119-y · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Eaton-Rosen, Z., Bragman, F., Bisdas, S., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Cardoso, M. J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00928-1_78 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationComparison of different deep learning architectures for synthetic CT generation from MR images
Bahrami, A., Karimian, A., & Arabi, H. (2021) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.09.006 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Tran, S.-T., Cheng, C.-H., Nguyen, T.-T., Le, M.-H., & Liu, D. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9010054 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
SoftSeg: Advantages of soft versus binary training for image segmentation
Gros, C., Lemay, A., & Cohen‐Adad, J. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102038 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Adversarial deformation regularization for training image registration neural networks
Hu, Y., Gibson, E., Ghavami, N., Bonmati, E., Moore, C. M., Emberton, M., Vercauteren, T. K., Noble, J., & Barratt, D. (2018) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep learning‐guided joint attenuation and scatter correction in multitracer neuroimaging studies
Arabi, H., Bortolin, K., Ginovart, N., Garibotto, V., & Zaidi, H. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25039 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Deep learning–based metal artefact reduction in PET/CT imaging
Arabi, H., & Zaidi, H. (2021) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-021-07709-z · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Attentive and ensemble 3D dual path networks for pulmonary nodules classification
Jiang, H., Gao, F., Xu, X., Huang, F., & Zhu, S. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.03.103 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Kavur, A. E., Gezer, N. S., BARIŞ, M. M., Şahin, Y. H., Özkan, S., Baydar, B., Yuksel, U., Kılıkçıer, Ç., Olut, Ş., Akar, G. B., et al. (2019) · Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.5152/dir.2019.19025 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Ghavami, N., Hu, Y., Gibson, E., Bonmati, E., Emberton, M., Moore, C. M., & Barratt, D. C. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.101558 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationStochastic Filter Groups for Multi-Task CNNs: Learning Specialist and Generalist Convolution Kernels
Bragman, F., Tanno, R., Sebastien Ourselin, A., Alexander, D. C., & Cardoso, M. J. (2019) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00147 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationHaghighi, F., Taher, M. R. H., Zhou, Z., Gotway, M. B., & Liang, J. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_14 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Vijh, S., Sharma, S. B., & Gaurav, P. (2019) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25797-2_8 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Volumetric Segmentation of Brain Regions From MRI Scans Using 3D Convolutional Neural Networks
Ramzan, F., Khan, M. U. G., Iqbal, S., Saba, T., & Rehman, A. U. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2998901 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Farda, N. A., Lai, J., Wang, J., Lee, P., Liu, J.-W., & Hsieh, I.-H. (2020) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.010 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Automated segmentation of endometrial cancer on MR images using deep learning
Hodneland, E., Dybvik, J. A., Wagner-Larsen, K. S., Šoltészová, V., Munthe-Kaas, A. Z., Fasmer, K. E., Krakstad, C., Lundervold, A., Lundervold, A. S., Salvesen, Ø. O., et al. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80068-9 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Gruendner, J., Schwachhofer, T., Sippl, P., Wolf, N., Erpenbeck, M., Gulden, C., Kapsner, L. A., Zierk, J., Mate, S., Stürzl, M., et al. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223010 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
DLTK: State of the Art Reference Implementations for Deep Learning on Medical ImagesPreprint
Pawlowski, N., Ktena, S. I., Lee, M. C. H., Kainz, B., Rueckert, D., Glocker, B., & Rajchl, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.06853 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Deep Learning with Neuroimaging and Genomics in Alzheimer’s Disease
Lin, E., Lin, C., & Lane, H. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22157911 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Baghdadi, A., Aldhaam, N. A., Elsayed, A. S., Hussein, A. A., Cavuoto, L. A., KAUFFMAN, E. C., & Guru, K. A. (2020) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.14985 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Devunooru, S., Alsadoon, A., Chandana, P. W. C., & Beg, A. (2020) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-01998-w · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Nikan, S., Osch, K. V., Bartling, M., Allen, D. G., Rohani, S., Connors, B., Agrawal, S. K., & Ladak, H. M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2020.3038363 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Liver tumor segmentation in CT volumes using an adversarial densely connected network
Chen, L., Song, H., Wang, C., Cui, Y., Yang, J., Hu, X., & Zhang, L. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3069-x · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Deep learning of brain magnetic resonance images: A brief review
Zhao, X., & Zhao, X.-M. (2020) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.09.007 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
PyMIC: A deep learning toolkit for annotation-efficient medical image segmentation
Wang, G., Luo, X., Gu, R., Yang, S., Qu, Y., Zhai, S., Zhao, Q., Li, K., & Zhang, S. (2023) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107398 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationArabi, H., & Zaidi, H. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101718 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Prostate lesion segmentation in MR images using radiomics based deeply supervised U-Net
Hambarde, P., Talbar, S. N., Mahajan, A., Chavan, S., Thakur, M., & Sable, N. P. (2020) · Journal of Applied Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2020.07.011 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Deep Learning Detection of Penumbral Tissue on Arterial Spin Labeling in Stroke
Wang, K., Shou, Q., Ma, S. J., Liebeskind, D. S., Qiao, X. J., Saver, J. L., Salamon, N., Kim, H., Yu, Y., Xie, Y., et al. (2019) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.119.027457 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Wang, G., Shapey, J., Li, W., Dorent, R., Demitriadis, A., Bisdas, S., Paddick, I., Bradford, R., Zhang, S., Sebastien Ourselin, A., et al. (2019) · Research Portal (King's College London) · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citation3D Segmentation Algorithms for Computerized Tomographic Imaging: a Systematic Literature Review
Carvalho, L. E., Sobieranski, A. C., & von Wangenheim, A. (2018) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-018-0101-z · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gibson, E., Li, W., Sudre, C., Fidon, L., Shakir, D. I., Wang, G., Eaton-Rosen, Z., Gray, R., Doel, T., Hu, Y., Whyntie, T., Nachev, P., Modat, M., Barratt, D. C., Ourselin, S., Cardoso, M. J., & Vercauteren, T.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Wenqi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 158
- Pages
- 113-122
- ISSN
- 0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5869052
- OpenAlex
- W2755930428
- Semantic Scholar
- c5762e451bc86e4742e575543cd545117b08de70
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 43.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Nvidia
- Wellcome Trust (HICF-T4-275, 203145Z, WT101957, 106882, 101957/Z/13/Z, 97914, /Z/15/Z, 203145/Z/16/Z, 106882/Z/15/Z)
- Cancer Research UK (19985, A19985, C28070/A19985)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (HICF-T4-275, EP/M020533/1)
- Royal Society (RG160569)
- University College London (203145Z/16/Z, EP/L016478/1)
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L016478/1, EP/K503745/1, EP/M020533/1, M020533/1, EP/K503745, WT101957, M020533, 203145/Z/16/Z)
- Science and Technology Facilities Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- deep learning platform, medical image analysis, computer-based intervention, open source software, medical image segmentation, data augmentation, TensorFlow, 3D image visualization, abdominal organ segmentation, brain MRI
- MeSH terms
- Abdomen, Machine Learning, Brain, Computer Simulation, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasonography, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review