The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for dual energy X-ray transmission tomography
Open accessAbstract
Reconstructing low-dose X-ray computed tomography (CT) images is a noise problem. This work investigated a penalized weighted least-squares (PWLS) approach to address this problem in two dimensions, where the WLS considers first- and second-order noise moments and the penalty models signal spatial correlations. Three different implementations were studied for the PWLS minimization. One utilizes a Markov random field (MRF) Gibbs functional to consider spatial correlations among nearby detector bins and projection views in sinogram space and minimizes the PWLS cost function by iterative Gauss-Seidel algorithm. Another employs Karhunen-Loève (KL) transform to de-correlate data signals among nearby views and minimizes the PWLS adaptively to each KL component by analytical calculation, where the spatial correlation among nearby bins is modeled by the same Gibbs functional. The third one models the spatial correlations among image pixels in image domain also by a MRF Gibbs functional and minimizes the PWLS by iterative successive over-relaxation algorithm. In these three implementations, a quadratic functional regularization was chosen for the MRF model. Phantom experiments showed a comparable performance of these three PWLS-based methods in terms of suppressing noise-induced streak artifacts and preserving resolution in the reconstructed images. Computer simulations concurred with the phantom experiments in terms of noise-resolution tradeoff and detectability in low contrast environment. The KL-PWLS implementation may have the advantage in terms of computation for high-resolution dynamic low-dose CT imaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yang, Q., Yan, P., Zhang, Y., Yu, H., Shi, Y., Mou, X., Kalra, M. K., Zhang, Y., Sun, L., & Wang, G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2827462 · Cited by 1,630
Li, M., Hsu, W., Xie, X., Cong, J., & Gao, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.2968472 · Cited by 321
Noise correlation in CBCT projection data and its application for noise reduction in low‐dose CBCT
Zhang, H., Ouyang, L., Ma, J., Huang, J., Chen, W., & Wang, J. (2014) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.4865782 · Cited by 47
A Bias-Reducing Loss Function for CT Image Denoising
Nagare, M., Melnyk, R., Rahman, O., Sauer, K. D., & Bouman, C. A. (2021) · ICASSP 2021 - 2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp39728.2021.9413855 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Sukovic, P., & Clinthorne, N. H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1075-1081
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143163922
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for dual energy X-ray transmission tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/42.896783
- The paper
- Sukovic, P., & Clinthorne, N. H. (2000). Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for dual energy X-ray transmission tomography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.896783
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.