The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm
Open accessAbstract
The finite mixture (FM) model is the most commonly used model for statistical segmentation of brain magnetic resonance (MR) images because of its simple mathematical form and the piecewise constant nature of ideal brain MR images. However, being a histogram-based model, the FM has an intrinsic limitation--no spatial information is taken into account. This causes the FM model to work only on well-defined images with low levels of noise; unfortunately, this is often not the the case due to artifacts such as partial volume effect and bias field distortion. Under these conditions, FM model-based methods produce unreliable results. In this paper, we propose a novel hidden Markov random field (HMRF) model, which is a stochastic process generated by a MRF whose state sequence cannot be observed directly but which can be indirectly estimated through observations. Mathematically, it can be shown that the FM model is a degenerate version of the HMRF model. The advantage of the HMRF model derives from the way in which the spatial information is encoded through the mutual influences of neighboring sites. Although MRF modeling has been employed in MR image segmentation by other researchers, most reported methods are limited to using MRF as a general prior in an FM model-based approach. To fit the HMRF model, an EM algorithm is used. We show that by incorporating both the HMRF model and the EM algorithm into a HMRF-EM framework, an accurate and robust segmentation can be achieved. More importantly, the HMRF-EM framework can easily be combined with other techniques. As an example, we show how the bias field correction algorithm of Guillemaud and Brady (1997) can be incorporated into this framework to achieve a three-dimensional fully automated approach for brain MR image segmentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1109/42.650883 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/bfb0056231 · DOI
- 10.1109/83.210863 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0262-8856(97)00067-X · doi:10.1016/s0262-8856(97)00067-x
- 10.1007/10704282_2 · DOI
- 10.1109/42.585758 · DOI · Paper page
- Brummer, 1992, Optimized intensity thresholds for volumetric analysis of magnetic resonance imaging data, Proc. SPIE, 1808, 299, 10.1117/12.131086 · doi:10.1117/12.131086
- 10.1016/0895-6111(90)90057-I · doi:10.1016/0895-6111(90)90057-i
- 10.1109/42.511747 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1986.tb01412.x · DOI · Paper page
- Li, 1995, Markov Random Field Modeling in Computer Vision, 10.1007/978-4-431-66933-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/42.126911 · doi:10.1109/42.126911
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00999.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/83.199925 · DOI
- 10.1016/0031-3203(89)90076-9 · DOI
- 10.1214/aos/1176346060 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P. R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D. E., et al. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · Cited by 13,630
Self-citationFast robust automated brain extraction
Smith, S. M. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 · Cited by 10,496
Self-citationFischl, B., Salat, D. H., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., van der Kouwe, A., Killiany, R., Kennedy, D., Klaveness, S., et al. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x · Cited by 8,610
Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018 · Cited by 7,507
The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project
Glasser, M. F., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Wilson, J. A., Coalson, T. S., Fischl, B., Andersson, J. L., Xu, J., Jbabdi, S., Webster, M., Polimeni, J. R., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127 · Cited by 5,253
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Brady, M., & Smith, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-57
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136573752
- Cited by
- 6,982
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 52.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/42.906424
- The paper
- Zhang, Y., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2001). Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.906424
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.