Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 746

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feed-forward neural networks

Open access
Bebis, G., Georgiopoulos, M.·1994·IEEE Potentials

Abstract

One critical aspect neural network designers face today is choosing an appropriate network size for a given application. Network size involves in the case of layered neural network architectures, the number of layers in a network, the number of nodes per layer, and the number of connections. Roughly speaking, a neural network implements a nonlinear mapping of u=G(x). The mapping function G is established during a training phase where the network learns to correctly associate input patterns x to output patterns u. Given a set of training examples (x, u), there is probably an infinite number of different size networks that can learn to map input patterns x into output patterns u. The question is, which network size is more appropriate for a given problem? Unfortunately, the answer to this question is not always obvious. Many researchers agree that the quality of a solution found by a neural network depends strongly on the network size used. In general, network size affects network complexity, and learning time. It also affects the generalization capabilities of the network; that is, its ability-to produce accurate results on patterns outside its training set.>

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/45.329294

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 746

Metadata

Authors
Bebis, G., & Georgiopoulos, M.
Venue
IEEE Potentials
Published
1994-10
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
27-31
ISSN
0278-6648 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986760892
Cited by
746
References
9
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feed-forward neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/45.329294
The paper
Bebis, G., & Georgiopoulos, M. (1994). Feed-forward neural networks. IEEE Potentials. https://doi.org/10.1109/45.329294

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.