The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceptual watermarks for digital images and video
Abstract
The growth of new imaging technologies has created a need for techniques that can be used for copyright protection of digital images and video. One approach for copyright protection is to introduce an invisible signal, known as a digital watermark, into an image or video sequence. In this paper, we describe digital watermarking techniques, known as perceptually based watermarks, that are designed to exploit aspects of the the human visual system in order to provide a transparent (invisible), yet robust watermark. In the most general sense, any watermarking technique that attempts to incorporate an invisible mark into an image is perceptually based. However, in order to provide transparency and robustness to attack, two conflicting requirements from a signal processing perspective, more sophisticated use of perceptual information in the watermarking process is required. We describe watermarking techniques ranging from simple schemes which incorporate common-sense rules in using perceptual information in the watermarking process, to more elaborate schemes which adapt to local image characteristics based on more formal perceptual models. This review is not meant to be exhaustive; its aim is to provide the reader with an understanding of how the techniques have been evolving as the requirements and applications become better defined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia
Cox, I. J., Kilian, J., Leighton, F. T., & Shamoon, T. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.650120 · Cited by 5,299
Cited by
Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures
Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2009) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.930649 · Cited by 3,175
Multimedia watermarking techniques
Hartung, F., & Kutter, M. (1999) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.771066 · Cited by 1,363
Watermarking digital image and video data. A state-of-the-art overview
Langelaar, G. C., Setyawan, I., & Lagendijk, R. L. (2000) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.879337 · Cited by 849
Digital watermarking: algorithms and applications
Podilchuk, C. I., & Delp, E. J. (2001) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.939835 · Cited by 746
Self-citationAnti-collusion fingerprinting for multimedia
Trappe, W., Wu, M., Wang, Z. J., & Liu, K. J. R. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2003.809378 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfgang, R. B., Podilchuk, C. I., & Delp, E. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1108-1126
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141852054
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptual watermarks for digital images and video. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/5.771067
- The paper
- Wolfgang, R. B., Podilchuk, C. I., & Delp, E. J. (1999). Perceptual watermarks for digital images and video. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.771067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.