The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Designing and evaluating e-business models
Abstract
This article presents an e-business modeling approach that combines the rigorous approach of IT systems analysis with an economic value perspective from business sciences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach
Osterwalder, A. (2004) · Unknown · doi:10.22005/bcu.15985 · Cited by 1,932
A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability
Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z · Cited by 995
Developing a unified framework of the business model concept
Al-Debei, M. M., & Avison, D. (2010) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.21 · Cited by 879
A research framework for analysing eBusiness models
Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2004) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000513 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Intelligent Systems
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 11-17
- ISSN
- 1541-1672 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118330142
- Cited by
- 738
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing and evaluating e-business models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/5254.941353
- The paper
- Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2001). Designing and evaluating e-business models. IEEE Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.941353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
