The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents
Abstract
Optimal use of encapsulated microbubbles for ultrasound contrast agents and drug delivery requires an understanding of the complex set of phenomena that affect the contrast agent echo and persistence. With the use of a video microscopy system coupled to either an ultrasound flow phantom or a chamber for insonifying stationary bubbles, we show that ultrasound has significant effects on encapsulated microbubbles. In vitro studies show that a train of ultrasound pulses can alter the structure of an albumin-shelled bubble, initiate various mechanisms of bubble destruction or produce aggregation that changes the echo spectrum. In this analysis, changes observed optically are compared with those observed acoustically for both albumin and lipid-shelled agents. We show that, when insonified with a narrowband pulse at an acoustic pressure of several hundred kPa, a phospholipid-shelled bubble can undergo net radius fluctuations of at least 15%; and an albumin-shelled bubble initially demonstrates constrained expansion and contraction. If the albumin shell contains air, the shell may not initially experience surface tension; therefore, the echo changes more significantly with repeated pulsing. A set of observations of contrast agent destruction is presented, which includes the slow diffusion of gas through the shell and formation of a shell defect followed by rapid diffusion of gas into the surrounding liquid. These observations demonstrate that the low-solubility gas used in these agents can persist for several hundred milliseconds in solution. With the transmission of a high-pulse repetition rate and a low pressure, the echoes from, contrast agents can be affected by secondary radiation force. Secondary radiation force is an attractive force for these experimental conditions, creating aggregates with distinct echo characteristics and extended persistence. The scattered echo from an aggregate is several times stronger and more narrowband than echoes from individual bubbles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions
Lindner, J. R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1417 · Cited by 872
Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction
Borden, M. A., Kruse, D. E., Caskey, C. F., Zhao, S., Dayton, P. A., & Ferrara, K. W. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2005.1561668 · Cited by 293
Self-citationMolecular imaging of cardiovascular disease with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
Lindner, J. R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2009.77 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Dayton, P. A., Morgan, K. E., Klibanov, A. L., Brandenburger, G. H., & Ferrara, K. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 220-232
- ISSN
- 0885-3010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083973152
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/58.741536
- The paper
- Dayton, P. A., Morgan, K. E., Klibanov, A. L., Brandenburger, G. H., & Ferrara, K. W. (1999). Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/58.741536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.