The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The conceptual basis for mediation services
Abstract
As information systems grow, they depend increasingly on diverse, heterogeneous resources, such as databases, knowledge bases, bibliographic files, Web-based information, computational facilities, digital libraries, geographic information systems, and simulations. Users typically develop and maintain these resources autonomously. Mediator modules comprise a layer of intelligent middleware services in information systems that link data resources and application programs. Currently, system developers must build intelligent mediators by carefully acquiring domain knowledge and handcrafting the required code. This article presents the conceptual underpinning for automating mediation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A translation approach to portable ontology specifications
Gruber, T. R. (1993) · Knowledge Acquisition · doi:10.1006/knac.1993.1008 · Cited by 12,752
Mediators in the architecture of future information systems
Wiederhold, G. (1992) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.121508 · Cited by 2,165
Self-citationA comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration
Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., & Navathe, S. B. (1986) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/27633.27634 · Cited by 1,740
KQML as an agent communication language
Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., & McEntire, R. (1994) · Proceedings of the third international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM '94 · doi:10.1145/191246.191322 · Cited by 1,482
Enabling technology for knowledge sharing
Neches, R. T., Fikes, R. E., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R. S., Senator, T. E., & Swartout, W. (1991) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v12i3.902 · Cited by 1,330
Genesereth, M. R., & Ketchpel, S. P. (1994) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/176789.176794 · Cited by 1,092
Self-citationKQML as an agent communication language
Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., & McEntire, R. (1994) · doi:10.13016/m2bvis-7jvt · Cited by 875
Object exchange across heterogeneous information sources
Papakonstantinou, Y., Garcia-Molina, H., & Widom, J. (2002) · Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.1995.380386 · Cited by 751
The DARPA knowledge sharing effort: progress report
Patil, R. S., Fikes, R. E., Patel‐Schneider, P. F., McKay, D., Finin, T., Gruber, T., & Neches, R. T. (1997) · Cited by 283
Intelligent Integration of Information
Wiederhold, G. C. M. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0467-8 · Cited by 199
Self-citation
Cited by
FMU-supported simulation for CPS Digital Twin
Negri, E., Fumagalli, L., Cimino, C., & Macchi, M. (2019) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.12.033 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiederhold, G., & Genesereth, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Expert
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 38-47
- ISSN
- 0885-9000 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028991148
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 26.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The conceptual basis for mediation services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/64.621227
- The paper
- Wiederhold, G., & Genesereth, M. (1997). The conceptual basis for mediation services. IEEE Expert. https://doi.org/10.1109/64.621227
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
