The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A translation approach to portable ontology specifications
Open accessAbstract
To support the sharing and reuse of formally represented knowledge among AI systems, it is useful to define the common vocabulary in which shared knowledge is represented. A specification of a representational vocabulary for a shared domain of discourse—definitions of classes, relations, functions, and other objects—is called an ontology. This paper describes a mechanism for defining ontologies that are portable over representation systems. Definitions written in a standard format for predicate calculus are translated by a system called Ontolingua into specialized representations, including frame-based systems as well as relational languages. This allows researchers to share and reuse ontologies, while retaining the computational benefits of specialized implementations. We discuss how the translation approach to portability addresses several technical problems. One problem is how to accommodate the stylistic and organizational differences among representations while preserving declarative content. Another is how to translate from a very expressive language into restricted languages, remaining system-independent while preserving the computational efficiency of implemented systems. We describe how these problems are addressed by basing Ontolingua itself on an ontology of domain-independent, representational idioms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing?
Gruber, T. R. (1995) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081 · Cited by 7,753
Self-citationThe business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach
Osterwalder, A. (2004) · Unknown · doi:10.22005/bcu.15985 · Cited by 1,932
A survey on digital twin: definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications
Barricelli, B. R., Casiraghi, E., & Fogli, D. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2953499 · Cited by 1,480
Guarino, N., Oberle, D., & Staab, S. (2009) · Handbook on Ontologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0 · Cited by 1,244
A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems
Nickerson, R. C., Varshney, U., & Muntermann, J. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.26 · Cited by 1,143
Metadata
- Authors
- Gruber, T. R.
- Venue
- Knowledge Acquisition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-220
- ISSN
- 1042-8143 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137079713
- Cited by
- 12,752
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/knac.1993.1008
- The paper
- Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.