The DOI matches its Crossref record.
KQML as an agent communication language
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the design of and experimentation with the Knowledge Query and Manipulation Language (KQML), a new language and protocol for exchanging information and knowledge. This work is part of a larger effort, the ARPA Knowledge Sharing Effort which is aimed at developing techniques and methodology for building large-scale knowledge bases which are sharable and reusable. KQML is both a message format and a message-handling protocol to support run-time knowledge sharing among agents. KQML focuses on an extensible set of performatives, which defines the permissible “speech acts” agents may use and comprise a substrate on which to develop higher-level models of interagent interaction such as contract nets and negotiation. In addition, KQML provides a basic architecture for knowledge sharing through a special class of agent called communication facilitors which coordinate the interactions of other agents. The ideas which underlie the evolving design of KQML are currently being explored through experimental prototype systems which are being used to support several testbeds in such areas as concurrent engineering, intelligent design and intelligent planning and scheduling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Embodiment in conversational interfaces: Rea
Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, L., Chang, K., Vilhjálmsson, H., & Yan, H. (1999) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems the CHI is the limit - CHI '99 · doi:10.1145/302979.303150 · Cited by 566
LEARNING BY TEACHING: A NEW AGENT PARADIGM FOR EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE
Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., & The Teachable Agents Group at Vande (2005) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839510590910200 · Cited by 462
Larks: Dynamic Matchmaking Among Heterogeneous Software Agents in Cyberspace
Sycara, K., Widoff, S., Klusch, M., & Lu, J. (2002) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1014897210525 · Cited by 454
InfoSleuth: agent-based semantic integration of information in open and dynamic environments
Bayardo, R. J., Nodine, M., Rashid, M., Rusinkiewicz, M., Shea, R., Unnikrishnan, C., Unruh, A., Woelk, D., Bohrer, W., Brice, R., et al. (1997) · Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '97 · doi:10.1145/253260.253294 · Cited by 406
On agent-mediated electronic commerce
He, M., Jennings, N. R., & Leung, H.-F. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2003.1209014 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., & McEntire, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the third international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM '94
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1994
- Pages
- 456-463
- OpenAlex
- W2160851181
- Cited by
- 1,482
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.47
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: KQML as an agent communication language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/191246.191322
- The paper
- Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., & McEntire, R. (1994). KQML as an agent communication language. Proceedings of the third international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM '94. https://doi.org/10.1145/191246.191322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.