The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Material removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing: theory and modeling
Abstract
The abrasion mechanism in solid-solid contact mode of the chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process is investigated in detail. Based on assumptions of plastic contact over wafer-abrasive and pad-abrasive interfaces, the normal distribution of abrasive size and an assumed periodic roughness of pad surface, a novel model is developed for material removal in CMP. The basic model is MRR=/spl rho//sub w/NVol/sub removed/, where /spl rho//sub w/ is the density of wafer N the number of active abrasives, and Vol/sub removed/ the volume of material removed by a single abrasive. The model proposed integrates process parameters including pressure and velocity and other important input parameters including the wafer hardness, pad hardness, pad roughness, abrasive size, and abrasive geometry into the same formulation to predict the material removal rate (MRR). An interface between the chemical effect and mechanical effect has been constructed through a fitting parameter H/sub w/ a "dynamical" hardness value of the wafer surface, in the model. It reflects the influences of chemicals on the mechanical material removal. The fluid effect in the current model is attributed to the number of active abrasives. It is found that the nonlinear down pressure dependence of material removal rate is related to a probability density function of the abrasive size and the elastic deformation of the pad. Compared with experimental results, the model accurately predicts MRR. With further verification of the model, a better understanding of the fundamental mechanism involved in material removal in the CMP process, particularly different roles played by the consumables and their interactions, can be obtained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Compliant grinding and polishing: A review
Zhu, W.-L., & Beaucamp, A. (2020) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103634 · Cited by 312
Toward Deterministic Material Removal and Surface Figure During Fused Silica Pad Polishing
Suratwala, T. I., Feit, M. D., & Steele, W. A. (2010) · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03607.x · Cited by 91
Convergent Pad Polishing of Amorphous Silica
Suratwala, T., Steele, R., Feit, M., Desjardin, R., & Mason, D. (2012) · International Journal of Applied Glass Science · doi:10.1111/j.2041-1294.2012.00080.x · Cited by 35
Mechanism of mid-spatial-frequency waviness removal by viscoelastic polishing tool
Zhu, W.-L., Pakenham-Walsh, O., Copson, K., Charlton, P., Tatsumi, K., Ju, B.-F., & Beaucamp, A. (2022) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2022.04.056 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, J., & Dornfeld, D. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 112-133
- ISSN
- 0894-6507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127767984
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Material removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing: theory and modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/66.920723
- The paper
- Luo, J., & Dornfeld, D. A. (2001). Material removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing: theory and modeling. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1109/66.920723
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.