The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scalable algorithms for association mining
Abstract
Association rule discovery has emerged as an important problem in knowledge discovery and data mining. The association mining task consists of identifying the frequent itemsets, and then forming conditional implication rules among them. We present efficient algorithms for the discovery of frequent itemsets which forms the compute intensive phase of the task. The algorithms utilize the structural properties of frequent itemsets to facilitate fast discovery. The items are organized into a subset lattice search space, which is decomposed into small independent chunks or sublattices, which can be solved in memory. Efficient lattice traversal techniques are presented which quickly identify all the long frequent itemsets and their subsets if required. We also present the effect of using different database layout schemes combined with the proposed decomposition and traversal techniques. We experimentally compare the new algorithms against the previous approaches, obtaining improvements of more than an order of magnitude for our test databases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hence, the ECLAT algorithm is more efficient and scalable in the area of association rule learning.”
From Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions (2021) · cites this paper as [131]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
Set-oriented mining for association rules in relational databases
Houtsma, M., & Swami, A. (2002) · Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.1995.380413 · Cited by 263
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1023/A:1009773317876 · DOI · Paper page
- zaki, 1997, new algorithms for fast discovery of association rules, Third Int l Conf Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 10.1023/A:1009773317876 · DOI · Paper page
- gunopulos, 1997, discovering all the most specific sentences by randomized algorithms, Int l Conf Database Theory
- gunopulos, 1997, data mining, hypergraph transversals, and machine learning, Proc 16th ACM Symp Principles of Database Systems
- garey, 1979, Computers and Intractability A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness
- 10.1016/0196-6774(92)90012-2 · doi:10.1016/0196-6774(92)90012-2
- 10.1145/253260.253330 · DOI · Paper page
- holsheimer, 1995, a perspective on databases and data mining, First Int l Conf Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
- lin, 1998, pincer-search: a new algorithm for discovering the maximum frequent set, Sixth Int l Conf Extending Database Technology
- kuznetsov, 1989, interpretation on graphs and complexity characteristics of a search for specific patterns, Nauchn Tekh Inf Ser 2 (Automatic Document Math Linguist), 23, 23
- 10.1109/ICDE.1998.655811 · doi:10.1109/icde.1998.655811
- 10.1145/321694.321698 · doi:10.1145/321694.321698
- 10.1109/69.634757 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/253260.253325 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/PDIS.1996.568665 · DOI · Paper page
- davey, 1990, Introduction to Lattices and Order
- 10.1016/0020-0190(94)90121-X · DOI
- agrawal, 1996, fast discovery of association rules, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 307
- 10.1109/RIDE.1997.583696 · DOI
- 10.1109/69.553164 · DOI · Paper page
- yen, 1996, an efficient approach to discovering knowledge from large databases, Fourth Int l Conf Parallel and Distributed Information Systems
- agrawal, 1994, fast algorithms for mining association rules, Proc 20th Very Large Data Base Conf
- 10.1145/276304.276313 · DOI · Paper page
- sarawagi, 1998, integrating association rule mining with databases: alternatives and implications, ACM SIGMOD Int l Conf Management of Data, 10.1145/276305.276335 · doi:10.1145/276305.276335
- parthasarathy, 1998, memory placement techniques for parallel association mining, Fourth Int l Conf Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
- toivonen, 1996, sampling large databases for association rules, Proc 22nd Very Large Data Bases Conf
- savasere, 1995, an efficient algorithm for mining association rules in large databases, Proc 21st Very Large Data Bases Conf
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions
Sarker, I. H. (2021) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x · Cited by 5,583
Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions
Han, J., Cheng, H., Xin, D., & Yan, X. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-006-0059-1 · Cited by 1,380
Sarker, I. H. (2022) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-022-01043-x · Cited by 1,208
Letham, B., Rudin, C., McCormick, T. H., & Madigan, D. (2015) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aoas848 · Cited by 766
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaki, M. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 372-390
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099404336
- Cited by
- 1,751
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 56.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scalable algorithms for association mining. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/69.846291
- The paper
- Zaki, M. J. (2000). Scalable algorithms for association mining. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/69.846291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.