The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A robust image authentication method distinguishing JPEG compression from malicious manipulation
Abstract
Image authentication verifies the originality of an image by detecting malicious manipulations. Its goal is different from that of image watermarking, which embeds into the image a signature surviving most manipulations. Most existing methods for image authentication treat all types of manipulation equally (i.e., as unacceptable). However, some practical applications demand techniques that can distinguish acceptable manipulations (e.g., compression) from malicious ones. In this paper, we present an effective technique for image authentication which can prevent malicious manipulations but allow JPEG lossy compression. The authentication signature is based on the invariance of the relationships between discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients at the same position in separate blocks of an image. These relationships are preserved when DCT coefficients are quantized in JPEG compression. Our proposed method can distinguish malicious manipulations from JPEG lossy compression regardless of the compression ratio or the number of compression iterations. We describe adaptive methods with probabilistic guarantee to handle distortions introduced by various acceptable manipulations such as integer rounding, image filtering, image enhancement, or scaling-recaling. We also present theoretical and experimental results to demonstrate the effectiveness of the technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia
Cox, I. J., Kilian, J., Leighton, F. T., & Shamoon, T. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.650120 · Cited by 5,299
Cited by
Robust and secure image hashing
Swaminathan, A., Mao, Y., & Wu, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2006.873601 · Cited by 552
Structural digital signature for image authentication: an incidental distortion resistant scheme
Lu, C.-S., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2003.811621 · Cited by 373
Perceptual Image Hashing Via Feature Points: Performance Evaluation and Tradeoffs
Monga, V., & Evans, B. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881948 · Cited by 363
Robust and Secure Image Hashing via Non-Negative Matrix Factorizations
Monga, V., & Mihcak, M. K. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2007.902670 · Cited by 295
Robust Image Hashing With Ring Partition and Invariant Vector Distance
Tang, Z., Zhang, X., Li, X., & Zhang, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2015.2485163 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, C.-Y., & Chang, S.-F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-168
- ISSN
- 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166554499
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A robust image authentication method distinguishing JPEG compression from malicious manipulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/76.905982
- The paper
- Lin, C.-Y., & Chang, S.-F. (2001). A robust image authentication method distinguishing JPEG compression from malicious manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/76.905982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.