Cited by 247Advanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

Robust Image Hashing With Ring Partition and Invariant Vector Distance

Tang, Zhenjun, Zhang, Xianquan, Li, Xianxian, Zhang, Shichao·2016·IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Abstract

Robustness and discrimination are two of the most important objectives in image hashing. We incorporate ring partition and invariant vector distance to image hashing algorithm for enhancing rotation robustness and discriminative capability. As ring partition is unrelated to image rotation, the statistical features that are extracted from image rings in perceptually uniform color space, i.e., CIE L*a*b* color space, are rotation invariant and stable. In particular, the Euclidean distance between vectors of these perceptual features is invariant to commonly used digital operations to images (e.g., JPEG compression, gamma correction, and brightness/contrast adjustment), which helps in making image hash compact and discriminative. We conduct experiments to evaluate the efficiency with 250 color images, and demonstrate that the proposed hashing algorithm is robust at commonly used digital operations to images. In addition, with the receiver operating characteristics curve, we illustrate that our hashing is much better than the existing popular hashing algorithms at robustness and discrimination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tifs.2015.2485163

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, Z., Zhang, X., Li, X., & Zhang, S.
Affiliations
  • Guangxi Normal University (CN)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2016-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
200-214
ISSN
  • 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6021
OpenAlex
W2183964636
Cited by
247
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 10
FWCI
17.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China 973 Program (2013CB329404, 2012CB326403)
  • Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2012GXNSFGA060004, 2015GXNSFDA139040)
  • Guangxi “Bagui Scholar” Teams for Innovation and Research
  • Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center of Multi-Source Information Integration and Intelligent Processing
  • Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Guangxi Education Administration (YB2014048)
  • Project of the Guangxi Key Laboratory of Multi-Source Information Mining and Security (14-A-02-02)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61300109, 61363034, 61562007, 61450001, 61170131)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
image hashing, rotation invariance, CIELAB color space, JPEG compression, gamma correction, brightness and contrast adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review