The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: a re-weighted minimum norm algorithm
Abstract
We present a nonparametric algorithm for finding localized energy solutions from limited data. The problem we address is underdetermined, and no prior knowledge of the shape of the region on which the solution is nonzero is assumed. Termed the FOcal Underdetermined System Solver (FOCUSS), the algorithm has two integral parts: a low-resolution initial estimate of the real signal and the iteration process that refines the initial estimate to the final localized energy solution. The iterations are based on weighted norm minimization of the dependent variable with the weights being a function of the preceding iterative solutions. The algorithm is presented as a general estimation tool usable across different applications. A detailed analysis laying the theoretical foundation for the algorithm is given and includes proofs of global and local convergence and a derivation of the rate of convergence. A view of the algorithm as a novel optimization method which combines desirable characteristics of both classical optimization and learning-based algorithms is provided. Mathematical results on conditions for uniqueness of sparse solutions are also given. Applications of the algorithm are illustrated on problems in direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation and neuromagnetic imaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holland, J. H. (1992) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66 · Cited by 5,764
Helmholtz, H. (1853) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.18531650603 · Cited by 989
Cited by
A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays
Malioutov, D., Cetin, M., & Willsky, A. S. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2005.850882 · Cited by 2,638
Sparse Bayesian Learning for Basis Selection
Wipf, D. P., & Rao, B. D. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.831016 · Cited by 1,559
Self-citationIteratively reweighted algorithms for compressive sensing
Chartrand, R., & Yin, W. (2008) · 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518498 · Cited by 1,248
Review on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis
Grech, R., Cassar, T., Muscat, J., Camilleri, K. P., Fabri, S. G., Zervakis, M., Xanthopoulos, P., Sakkalis, V., & Vanrumste, B. (2008) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-5-25 · Cited by 1,193
Electrophysiological Imaging of Brain Activity and Connectivity—Challenges and Opportunities
He, B., Yang, L., Wilke, C., & Yuan, H. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2139210 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Gorodnitsky, I. F., & Rao, B. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 600-616
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122315118
- Cited by
- 1,834
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.