The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An affine scaling methodology for best basis selection
Abstract
A methodology is developed to derive algorithms for optimal basis selection by minimizing diversity measures proposed by Wickerhauser (1994) and Donoho (1994). These measures include the p-norm-like (l/sub (p/spl les/1)/) diversity measures and the Gaussian and Shannon entropies. The algorithm development methodology uses a factored representation for the gradient and involves successive relaxation of the Lagrangian necessary condition. This yields algorithms that are intimately related to the affine scaling transformation (AST) based methods commonly employed by the interior point approach to nonlinear optimization. The algorithms minimizing the (l/sub (p/spl les/1)/) diversity measures are equivalent to a previously developed class of algorithms called focal underdetermined system solver (FOCUSS). The general nature of the methodology provides a systematic approach for deriving this class of algorithms and a natural mechanism for extending them. It also facilitates a better understanding of the convergence behavior and a strengthening of the convergence results. The Gaussian entropy minimization algorithm is shown to be equivalent to a well-behaved p=0 norm-like optimization algorithm. Computer experiments demonstrate that the p-norm-like and the Gaussian entropy algorithms perform well, converging to sparse solutions. The Shannon entropy algorithm produces solutions that are concentrated but are shown to not converge to a fully sparse solution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Cited by
A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays
Malioutov, D., Cetin, M., & Willsky, A. S. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2005.850882 · Cited by 2,638
Sparse Bayesian Learning for Basis Selection
Wipf, D. P., & Rao, B. D. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.831016 · Cited by 1,559
Self-citationExact Reconstruction of Sparse Signals via Nonconvex Minimization
Chartrand, R. (2007) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2007.898300 · Cited by 1,277
Iteratively reweighted algorithms for compressive sensing
Chartrand, R., & Yin, W. (2008) · 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518498 · Cited by 1,248
Iterative Reweighted $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ Methods for Finding Sparse Solutions
Wipf, D., & Nagarajan, S. (2010) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2010.2042413 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, B. D., & Kreutz-Delgado, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-200
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143163931
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An affine scaling methodology for best basis selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/78.738251
- The paper
- Rao, B. D., & Kreutz-Delgado, K. (1999). An affine scaling methodology for best basis selection. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.738251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.