The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Iterative Reweighted $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ Methods for Finding Sparse Solutions
Abstract
A variety of practical methods have recently been introduced for finding maximally sparse representations from overcomplete dictionaries, a central computational task in compressive sensing applications as well as numerous others. Many of the underlying algorithms rely on iterative reweighting schemes that produce more focal estimates as optimization progresses. Two such variants are iterative reweighted l1and l2minimization; however, some properties related to convergence and sparse estimation, as well as possible generalizations, are still not clearly understood or fully exploited. In this paper, we make the distinction betweenseparableandnon-separableiterative reweighting algorithms. The vast majority of existing methods are separable, meaning the weighting of a given coefficient at each iteration is only a function of that individual coefficient from the previous iteration (as opposed to dependency on all coefficients). We examine two such separable reweighting schemes: an l2method from Chartrand and Yin (2008) and an l1approach from Cande's (2008), elaborating on convergence results and explicit connections between them. We then explore an interesting non-separable alternative that can be implemented via either l2or l1reweighting and maintains several desirable properties relevant to sparse recovery despite a highly non-convex underlying cost function. For example, in the context of canonical sparse estimation problems, we prove uniform superiority of this method over the minimum l1solution in that, 1) it can never do worse when implemented with reweighted l1, and 2) for any dictionary and sparsity profile, there will always exist cases where it does better. These results challenge the prevailing reliance on strictly convex (and separable) penalty functions for finding sparse solutions. We then derive a new non-separable variant with similar properties that exhibits further performance improvements in empirical tests. Finally, we address natural extensions to group sparsity problems and non-negative sparse coding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Model Selection and Estimation in Regression with Grouped Variables
Yuan, M., & Lin, Y. (2006) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.x · Cited by 7,261
Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization
Candès, E. J., Wakin, M. B., & Boyd, S. P. (2008) · Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x · Cited by 4,863
Linear and nonlinear programming.
(1986) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(86)90092-3 · Cited by 4,805
Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks
Neal, R. M. (1996) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0745-0 · Cited by 4,276
Greed is Good: Algorithmic Results for Sparse Approximation
Tropp, J. A. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2004.834793 · Cited by 3,635
Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ 1 minimization
Donoho, D. L., & Elad, M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0437847100 · Cited by 2,898
Donoho, D. L. (2006) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.20132 · Cited by 2,490
(2000) · CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · doi:10.1162/15324430152748236 · Cited by 1,819
Iteratively reweighted least squares minimization for sparse recovery
Daubechies, I., DeVore, R., Fornasier, M., & Güntürk, C. S. (2010) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.20303 · Cited by 1,295
Cited by
Sohrabpour, A., Lu, Y., Worrell, G., & He, B. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.064 · Cited by 89
“Following the idea AC C EP TE D M AN U SC R IP T proposed in the sparse signal processing literature (Candès et al., 2008; Wipf and Nagarajan, 2010), the heuristic that locations with smaller dipole amplitude need to be penalized more than other locations, will be formalized.”
Method(2011) · Cited by 42
A new multiple kernel-based regularization method for identification of delay linear dynamic systems
Chen, X., Mao, Z., & Jia, R. (2020) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.103971 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Wipf, D., & Nagarajan, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 317-329
- ISSN
- 1932-4553 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0484
- OpenAlex
- W2161765392
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 22.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iterative Reweighted $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ Methods for Finding Sparse Solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jstsp.2010.2042413
- The paper
- Wipf, D., & Nagarajan, S. (2010). Iterative Reweighted $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ Methods for Finding Sparse Solutions. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstsp.2010.2042413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.