The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC
Abstract
A new method for source localization is described that is based on a modification of the well-known MUSIC algorithm. In classical MUSIC, the array manifold vector is projected onto an estimate of the signal subspace. Errors in the estimate of the signal subspace can make localization of multiple sources difficult. Recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC uses each successively located source to form an intermediate array gain matrix and projects both the array manifold and the signal subspace estimate into its orthogonal complement. The MUSIC projection to find the next source is then performed in this reduced subspace. Special assumptions about the array manifold structure, such as Vandermonde or shift invariance, are not required. Using the metric of principal angles, we describe a general form of the RAP-MUSIC algorithm for the case of diversely polarized sources. Through a uniform linear array simulation with two highly correlated sources, we demonstrate the improved Monte Carlo error performance of RAP-MUSIC relative to MUSIC and two other sequential subspace methods: S and IES-MUSIC. We then demonstrate the more general utility of this algorithm for multidimensional array manifolds in a magnetoencephalography (MEG) source localization simulation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation
Schmidt, R. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/tap.1986.1143830 · Cited by 14,718
ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques
Roy, R., & Kailath, T. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.32276 · Cited by 7,326
Two decades of array signal processing research: the parametric approach
Krim, H., & Viberg, M. (1996) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.526899 · Cited by 4,774
Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J., & Lounasmaa, O. V. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.413 · Cited by 4,684
A signal subspace approach to multiple emitter location and spectral estimation
Schmidt, R. O. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,154
Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data
Mosher, J. C., Lewis, P. S., & Leahy, R. M. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.141192 · Cited by 1,048
Self-citationRecursive MUSIC: A framework for EEG and MEG source localization
Mosher, J. C., & Leahy, R. M. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.725331 · Cited by 362
Self-citationDirection finding with an array of antennas having diverse polarizations
Ferrara, E., & Parks, T. W. (1983) · IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/tap.1983.1143038 · Cited by 241
Spatial-spectrum estimation in a location sector
Buckley, K. M., & Xu, X. L. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.103086 · Cited by 116
On the performance of signal-subspace processing-- Part I: Narrow-band systems
Wang, H., & Kaveh, M. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1986.1164957 · Cited by 115
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- golub, 1984, Matrix Computations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baillet, S., Mosher, J., & Leahy, R. (2001) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.962275 · Cited by 1,846
Self-citationReview on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis
Grech, R., Cassar, T., Muscat, J., Camilleri, K. P., Fabri, S. G., Zervakis, M., Xanthopoulos, P., Sakkalis, V., & Vanrumste, B. (2008) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-5-25 · Cited by 1,193
EEG source localization: Sensor density and head surface coverage
Song, J., Davey, C., Poulsen, C., Luu, P., Turovets, S. I., Anderson, E. W., Li, K., & Tucker, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.015 · Cited by 347
Rank Awareness in Joint Sparse Recovery
Davies, M. E., & Eldar, Y. C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2011.2173722 · Cited by 340
Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation
Darvas, F., Pantazis, D., Kucukaltun-Yildirim, E., & Leahy, R. M. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.014 · Cited by 308
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mosher, J. C., & Leahy, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 332-340
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126767504
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Southern California
- Villanova University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Keywords
- source localization, rap music, MUSIC algorithm, signal subspace estimation, principal angles, correlated sources, uniform linear array, magnetoencephalography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
