The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A unified approach to statistical tomography using coordinate descent optimization
Abstract
Over the past years there has been considerable interest in statistically optimal reconstruction of cross-sectional images from tomographic data. In particular, a variety of such algorithms have been proposed for maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstruction from emission tomographic data. While MAP estimation requires the solution of an optimization problem, most existing reconstruction algorithms take an indirect approach based on the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. We propose a new approach to statistically optimal image reconstruction based on direct optimization of the MAP criterion. The key to this direct optimization approach is greedy pixel-wise computations known as iterative coordinate decent (ICD). We propose a novel method for computing the ICD updates, which we call ICD/Newton-Raphson. We show that ICD/Newton-Raphson requires approximately the same amount of computation per iteration as EM-based approaches, but the new method converges much more rapidly (in our experiments, typically five to ten iterations). Other advantages of the ICD/Newton-Raphson method are that it is easily applied to MAP estimation of transmission tomograms, and typical convex constraints, such as positivity, are easily incorporated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography
Shepp, L. A., & Vardi, Y. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.1982.4307558 · Cited by 4,429
A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography
Vardi, Y., Shepp, L. A., & Kaufman, L. (1985) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1985.10477119 · Cited by 863
Cited by
Wright, S. J. (2015) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-015-0892-3 · Cited by 1,438
Plug-and-Play priors for model based reconstruction
Venkatakrishnan, S. V., Bouman, C. A., & Wohlberg, B. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing · doi:10.1109/globalsip.2013.6737048 · Cited by 1,178
Self-citationA three‐dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT
Thibault, J., Sauer, K. D., Bouman, C. A., & Hsieh, J. (2007) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.2789499 · Cited by 937
Self-citationRegularizing Flows for Constrained Matrix-Valued Images
Chefd'hotel, C., Tschumperlé, D., Deriche, R., & Faugeras, O. (2004) · Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision · doi:10.1023/b:jmiv.0000011920.58935.9c · Cited by 648
You, C., Cong, W., Vannier, M. W., Saha, P. K., Hoffman, E. A., Wang, G., Li, G., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Shan, H., et al. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2922960 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouman, C. A., & Sauer, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-492
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2110733023
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A unified approach to statistical tomography using coordinate descent optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.491321
- The paper
- Bouman, C. A., & Sauer, K. (1996). A unified approach to statistical tomography using coordinate descent optimization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.491321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.