The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear operator for oriented texture
Open accessAbstract
Texture is an important part of the visual world of animals and humans and their visual systems successfully detect, discriminate, and segment texture. Relatively recently progress was made concerning structures in the brain that are presumably responsible for texture processing. Neurophysiologists reported on the discovery of a new type of orientation selective neuron in areas V1 and V2 of the visual cortex of monkeys which they called grating cells. Such cells respond vigorously to a grating of bars of appropriate orientation, position and periodicity. In contrast to other orientation selective cells, grating cells respond very weakly or not at all to single bars which do not make part of a grating. Elsewhere we proposed a nonlinear model of this type of cell and demonstrated the advantages of grating cells with respect to the separation of texture and form information. In this paper, we use grating cell operators to obtain features and compare these operators in texture analysis tasks with commonly used feature extracting operators such as Gabor-energy and co-occurrence matrix operators. For a quantitative comparison of the discrimination properties of the concerned operators a new method is proposed which is based on the Fisher (1923) linear discriminant and the Fisher criterion. The operators are also qualitatively compared with respect to their ability to separate texture from form information and their suitability for texture segmentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions
Ojala, T., Pietikäinen, M., & Harwood, D. (1996) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/0031-3203(95)00067-4 · Cited by 6,882
Daugman, J. G. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.001160 · Cited by 3,219
Jones, J. P., & Palmer, L. A. (1987) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1987.58.6.1233 · Cited by 1,658 · cited 1×
“It has been found to vary in a limited range of [43].”
BackgroundSpatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex.
Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488 · Cited by 890
Cited by
Zacharaki, E. I., Wang, S., Chawla, S., Soo Yoo, D., Wolf, R., Melhem, E. R., & Davatzikos, C. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22147 · Cited by 855
Finding defects in texture using regularity and local orientation
Chetverikov, D., & Hanbury, A. (2002) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(01)00188-1 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Kruizinga, P., & Petkov, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1395-1407
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169369279
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear operator for oriented texture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.791965
- The paper
- Kruizinga, P., & Petkov, N. (1999). Nonlinear operator for oriented texture. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.791965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.