The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey of state and disturbance observers for practitioners
Abstract
This paper gives a unified and historical review of observer design for the benefit of practitioners. It is unified in the sense that all observers are examined in terms of: 1) the assumed dynamic structure of the plant; 2) the required information, including the input signals and modeling information of the plant; and 3) the implementation equation of the observer. This allows a practitioner, with a particular observer design problem in mind, to quickly find a suitable solution. The review is historical in the sense that it follows the evolution of ideas in observer design in the last half century. From the distinction in problem formulation, required modeling information and the observer design goal, we can see two schools of thought: one is developed in the framework of modern control theory; the other is based on disturbance estimation, which has been, to some extent, overlooked
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Observers for multivariable systems
Luenberger, D. (1966) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1966.1098323 · Cited by 1,763
Cited by
On the centrality of disturbance rejection in automatic control
Gao, Z. (2014) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2013.09.012 · Cited by 481
Self-citationSurvey on methods of increasing the efficiency of extended state disturbance observers
Madoński, R., & Herman, P. (2015) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2014.11.008 · Cited by 271
Review and classification of recent observers applied in chemical process systems
Mohd Ali, J., Ha Hoang, N., Hussain, M. A., & Dochain, D. (2015) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.01.019 · Cited by 239
Synchronization of Industrial Plant and Digital Twin
Zipper, H., & Diedrich, C. (2019) · 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) · doi:10.1109/etfa.2019.8868994 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Radke, A., & Gao, Z.
- Venue
- 2006 American Control Conference
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 6 pp.
- ISSN
- 0743-1619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142370959
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.95
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey of state and disturbance observers for practitioners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/acc.2006.1657545
- The paper
- Radke, A., & Gao, Z. (2006). A survey of state and disturbance observers for practitioners. 2006 American Control Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/acc.2006.1657545
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
