Cited by 394Digital Media Forensic DetectionAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesDigital and Cyber Forensics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 179 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Information Forensics: An Overview of the First Decade

Open access

Abstract

In recent decades, we have witnessed the evolution of information technologies from the development of VLSI technologies, to communication and networking infrastructure, to the standardization of multimedia compression and coding schemes, to effective multimedia content search and retrieval. As a result, multimedia devices and digital content have become ubiquitous. This path of technological evolution has naturally led to a critical issue that must be addressed next, namely, to ensure that content, devices, and intellectual property are being used by authorized users for legitimate purposes, and to be able to forensically prove with high confidence when otherwise. When security is compromised, intellectual rights are violated, or authenticity is forged, forensic methodologies and tools are employed to reconstruct what has happened to digital content in order to answer who has done what, when, where, and how. The goal of this paper is to provide an overview on what has been done over the last decade in the new and emerging field of information forensics regarding theories, methodologies, state-of-the-art techniques, major applications, and to provide an outlook of the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2013.2260814

Cites

176 of 176 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 179 references

3 of the 179 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. chu, 2012, Forensic identification of compressive sensing in nearly sparse signals, Proc IEEE Int Conf Image Process, 257
  2. owen, 1995, Game Theory
  3. stone, 1996, Analysis of attacks on image watermarks with randomized coefficients
  4. valenzise, 2011, Forensics versus. anti-forensics: A decision and game theoretic framework, Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process, 1749
  5. lai, 2011, Anti-forensics for frame deletion/addition in MPEG video, Proc Inf Hiding Conf, 1876
  6. sanders, 2008, Digital authenticity using the electric network frequency, Proc 33rd AES Int Conf Audio Forensics Theory Practice, 1
  7. 2009, Visualizing the U S Electric Grid
  8. ng, 2009, Camera response function signature for digital forensics?Part I: Theory and data selection and Part II: Signature extraction, Proc IEEE Workshop Inf Forensics Security, 156
  9. 2009, Best Practice Guidelines for ENF Analysis in Forensic Authentication of Digital Evidence by ENFSI Forensic Speech and Audio Analysis Working Group Document# FSAAWG-BPM-ENF-001
  10. cox, 2001, Digital Watermarking Principles & Practice
  11. popescu, 2004, Statistical tools for digital forensics, Proc 6th Int Workshop Inf Hiding, 128

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 393

Metadata

Authors
Stamm, M. C., Wu, M., & Liu, K. J. R.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2013
Volume
1
Pages
167-200
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046686077
Cited by
394
References
179
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
25.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital and Cyber Forensics
Keywords
information forensics, digital forensics, multimedia forensics, intellectual property protection, digital watermarking, digital signatures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review