Cited by 28Digital Media Forensic DetectionAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesDigital and Cyber Forensics

Information Forensics and Security: A quarter-century-long journey

Open access
Barni, Mauro, Campisi, Patrizio, Delp, Edward J., Doërr, Gwenaël, Fridrich, Jessica, Memon, Nasir, Pérez-González, Fernando, Rocha, Anderson +2 more·2023·IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Abstract

Information forensics and security (IFS) is an active R&D area whose goal is to ensure that people use devices, data, and intellectual properties for authorized purposes and to facilitate the gathering of solid evidence to hold perpetrators accountable. For over a quarter century, since the 1990s, the IFS research area has grown tremendously to address the societal needs of the digital information era. The IEEE Signal Processing Society (SPS) has emerged as an important hub and leader in this area, and this article celebrates some landmark technical contributions. In particular, we highlight the major technological advances by the research community in some selected focus areas in the field during the past 25 years and present future trends.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/msp.2023.3275319

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perceptual hashing generates similar binary hashes for perceptually similar contents and different hashes for different contents.

    “Perceptual hashing, also known as robust hashing, is a content fingerprinting technique that generates similar binary hashes for perceptually similar contents and different hashes for different contents [1].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barni, M., Campisi, P., Delp, E. J., Doërr, G., Fridrich, J., Memon, N., Pérez-González, F., Rocha, A., Verdoliva, L., & Wu, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Siena (IT)
  • Roma Tre University (IT)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Synamedia, Rennes, France
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
Published
2023-07
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
67-79
ISSN
  • 1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0792
OpenAlex
W4384937769
Cited by
28
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
  • Investigo Institutional repository of UVigo (Universidade de Vigo) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
  • European Regional Development (ED431C 2021/47)
  • National Science Foundation (2028119)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital and Cyber Forensics
Keywords
information forensics, digital forensics, digital security, digital evidence, intellectual property protection, digital watermarking, digital signatures, image forensics, digital video forensics, digital fingerprinting, digital steganography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review