The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Security Enhancement for IoT Communications Exposed to Eavesdroppers With Uncertain Locations
Open accessAbstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) depicts a bright future, where any devices having sensorial and computing capabilities can interact with each other. Among all existing technologies, the techniques for the fifth generation (5G) systems are the main driving force for the actualization of IoT concept. However, due to the heterogeneous environment in 5G networks and the broadcast nature of radio propagation, the security assurance against eavesdropping is a vital yet challenging task. In this paper, we focus on the transmission design for secure relay communications in IoT networks, where the communication is exposed to eavesdroppers with unknown number and locations. The randomize-and-forward relay strategy specially designed for secure multi-hop communications is employed in our transmission protocol. First, we consider a single-antenna scenario, where all the devices in the network are equipped with the single antenna. We derive the expression for the secrecy outage probability of the two-hop transmission. Following this, a secrecy-rate-maximization problem subject to a secrecy-outage-probability constraint is formulated. The optimal power allocation and codeword rate design are obtained. Furthermore, we generalize the above analyses to a more generic scenario, where the relay and eavesdroppers are equipped with multiple antennas. Numerical results show that the proper use of relay transmission can enhance the secrecy throughput and extend the secure coverage range.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Computer for the 21st Century
Weiser, M. (1991) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94 · Cited by 10,017
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
A Survey of 5G Network: Architecture and Emerging Technologies
Gupta, A., & Jha, R. K. (2015) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2015.2461602 · Cited by 2,420
Cited by
A Review on the Use of Blockchain for the Internet of Things
Fernandez-Carames, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2842685 · Cited by 1,078
A Survey on Internet of Things and Cloud Computing for Healthcare
Dang, L. M., Piran, M. J., Han, D., Min, K., & Moon, H. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8070768 · Cited by 640
Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Research: A Review of Current Research Topics
Lu, Y., & Xu, L. D. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2869847 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, Q., Ren, P., Song, H., & Du, Q.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 2840-2853
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2414819045
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Security Enhancement for IoT Communications Exposed to Eavesdroppers With Uncertain Locations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2016.2575863
- The paper
- Xu, Q., Ren, P., Song, H., & Du, Q. (2016). Security Enhancement for IoT Communications Exposed to Eavesdroppers With Uncertain Locations. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2575863
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.