The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Technology Standards and Patent Portfolios for Enabling Cyber-Physical Systems in Advanced Manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
Cyber-physical systems (CPS) are a collection of transformative technologies for managing interconnected physical and computational capabilities. Recent developments in technology are increasing the availability and affordability of sensors, data acquisition systems, and computer networks. The competitive nature of industry requires manufacturers to implement new methodologies. CPS is a broad area of engineering which supports applications across industries, such as manufacturing, healthcare, electric power grids, agriculture, and transportation. In particular, CPS is the core technology enabling the transition from Industry 3.0 to Industry 4.0 (I 4.0) and is transforming global advanced manufacturing. This paper provides a consolidated review of the latest CPS literature, a complete review of international standards, and a complete analysis of patent portfolios related to the 5C's CPS architecture model by Lee et al. The critical evaluation of international standards and the intellectual property contained in CPS patents is unaddressed by the previous research and will benefit both academic scholars and industry practitioners. The analysis provides a basis for predicting research and development future trends and helps policy makers manage technology changes that will result from CPS in I 4.0. This paper covers the emerging I 4.0 standards from the International Organization for Standardization, the International Electrotechnical Commission, and China's Guobiao standards followed by a patent analysis covering global patents issued in the U.S., Europe, China, and the World Intellectual Property Organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Change Through Digitization—Value Creation in the Age of Industry 4.0
Kagermann, H. (2015) · Management of Permanent Change · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-05014-6_2 · Cited by 838
Role of Ontologies for CPS Implementation in Manufacturing
Garetti, M., Fumagalli, L., & Negri, E. (2015) · Management and Production Engineering Review · doi:10.1515/mper-2015-0033 · Cited by 64
Cited by
Wollschlaeger, M., Sauter, T., & Jasperneite, J. (2017) · IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mie.2017.2649104 · Cited by 1,726
Digital twin shop-floor: a new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing
Tao, F., & Zhang, M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2756069 · Cited by 1,397
Extracting and mapping industry 4.0 technologies using wikipedia
Chiarello, F., Trivelli, L., Bonaccorsi, A., & Fantoni, G. (2018) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.04.006 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., Govindarajan, U. H., Sun, J. J., & Chuang, A. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 7356-7382
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2538959687
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Technology Standards and Patent Portfolios for Enabling Cyber-Physical Systems in Advanced Manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2016.2619360
- The paper
- Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., Govindarajan, U. H., Sun, J. J., & Chuang, A. C. (2016). A Review of Technology Standards and Patent Portfolios for Enabling Cyber-Physical Systems in Advanced Manufacturing. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2619360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.