Cited by 589Robot Manipulation and LearningProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsRobotics and Automated Systems

Working Together: A Review on Safe Human-Robot Collaboration in Industrial Environments

Open access
Robla-Gomez, S., Becerra, Victor M., Llata, J. R., Gonzalez-Sarabia, E., Torre-Ferrero, C., Perez-Oria, J.·2017·IEEE Access

Abstract

After many years of rigid conventional procedures of production, industrial manufacturing is going through a process of change toward flexible and intelligent manufacturing, the so-called Industry 4.0. In this paper, human-robot collaboration has an important role in smart factories since it contributes to the achievement of higher productivity and greater efficiency. However, this evolution means breaking with the established safety procedures as the separation of workspaces between robot and human is removed. These changes are reflected in safety standards related to industrial robotics since the last decade, and have led to the development of a wide field of research focusing on the prevention of human-robot impacts and/or the minimization of related risks or their consequences. This paper presents a review of the main safety systems that have been proposed and applied in industrial robotic environments that contribute to the achievement of safe collaborative human-robot work. Additionally, a review is provided of the current regulations along with new concepts that have been introduced in them. The discussion presented in this paper includes multidisciplinary approaches, such as techniques for estimation and the evaluation of injuries in human-robot collisions, mechanical and software devices designed to minimize the consequences of human-robot impact, impact detection systems, and strategies to prevent collisions or minimize their consequences when they occur.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2017.2773127

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many devices that operate in Industry 4.0 factories have very limited computational resources, so they struggle with modern secure public-key cryptography schemes.

    “Many devices that operate in Industry 4.0 factories (e.g., sensors, actuators, tools) have very limited computational resources (i.e., memory and processing power), so they struggle with modern secure public-key cryptography schemes [155].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robla-Gomez, S., Becerra, V. M., Llata, J. R., Gonzalez-Sarabia, E., Torre-Ferrero, C., & Perez-Oria, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • Universidad de Cantabria (ES)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2017
Volume
5
Pages
26754-26773
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768174095
Cited by
589
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 1
FWCI
23.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCrea (University of Cantabria) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
Keywords
human-robot collaboration, industrial robots, robot safety, human-robot collision, collision avoidance, impact detection, injury estimation, safety standards, Industry 4.0, smart factory, safety systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review