The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Learning Approach for Intelligent Intrusion Detection System
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning techniques are being widely used to develop an intrusion detection system (IDS) for detecting and classifying cyberattacks at the network-level and the host-level in a timely and automatic manner. However, many challenges arise since malicious attacks are continually changing and are occurring in very large volumes requiring a scalable solution. There are different malware datasets available publicly for further research by cyber security community. However, no existing study has shown the detailed analysis of the performance of various machine learning algorithms on various publicly available datasets. Due to the dynamic nature of malware with continuously changing attacking methods, the malware datasets available publicly are to be updated systematically and benchmarked. In this paper, a deep neural network (DNN), a type of deep learning model, is explored to develop a flexible and effective IDS to detect and classify unforeseen and unpredictable cyberattacks. The continuous change in network behavior and rapid evolution of attacks makes it necessary to evaluate various datasets which are generated over the years through static and dynamic approaches. This type of study facilitates to identify the best algorithm which can effectively work in detecting future cyberattacks. A comprehensive evaluation of experiments of DNNs and other classical machine learning classifiers are shown on various publicly available benchmark malware datasets. The optimal network parameters and network topologies for DNNs are chosen through the following hyperparameter selection methods with KDDCup 99 dataset. All the experiments of DNNs are run till 1,000 epochs with the learning rate varying in the range [0.01-0.5]. The DNN model which performed well on KDDCup 99 is applied on other datasets, such as NSL-KDD, UNSW-NB15, Kyoto, WSN-DS, and CICIDS 2017, to conduct the benchmark. Our DNN model learns the abstract and high-dimensional feature representation of the IDS data by passing them into many hidden layers. Through a rigorous experimental testing, it is confirmed that DNNs perform well in comparison with the classical machine learning classifiers. Finally, we propose a highly scalable and hybrid DNNs framework called scale-hybrid-IDS-AlertNet which can be used in real-time to effectively monitor the network traffic and host-level events to proactively alert possible cyberattacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034 · Cited by 5,370
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318 · cited 2×
“The details of various IDS datasets are discussed in [59] and [66].”
BackgroundBro: a system for detecting network intruders in real-time
Paxson, V. (1999) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(99)00112-7 · Cited by 2,636
A Deep Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Yin, C., Zhu, Y., Fei, J., & He, X. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2762418 · Cited by 2,100
Enhanced Network Anomaly Detection Based on Deep Neural Networks
Naseer, S., Saleem, Y., Khalid, S., Bashir, M. K., Han, J., Iqbal, M. M., & Han, K. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2863036 · Cited by 507
Adaptive, model-based monitoring for cyber attack detection
Valdes, A., & Skinner, K. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-39945-3_6 · Cited by 309
Parzen-window network intrusion detectors
Yeung, D.-Y., & Chow, C. (2003) · Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots · doi:10.1109/icpr.2002.1047476 · Cited by 277
Cited by
IMCFN: Image-based malware classification using fine-tuned convolutional neural network architecture
Vasan, D., Alazab, M., Wassan, S., Naeem, H., Safaei, B., & Zheng, Q. (2020) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107138 · Cited by 513
Self-citationAnomaly-based intrusion detection system for IoT networks through deep learning model
Saba, T., Rehman, A., Sadad, T., Kolivand, H., & Bahaj, S. A. (2022) · Computers and Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107810 · Cited by 445
Performance Comparison and Current Challenges of Using Machine Learning Techniques in Cybersecurity
Shaukat, K., Luo, S., Varadharajan, V., Hameed, I., Chen, S., Liu, D., & Li, J. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13102509 · Cited by 303
The Role of Machine Learning in Cybersecurity
Apruzzese, G., Laskov, P., Montes de Oca, E., Mallouli, W., Brdalo Rapa, L., Grammatopoulos, A. V., & Di Franco, F. (2023) · Digital Threats: Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3545574 · Cited by 279
Haque, A. K. M. B., Bhushan, B., & Dhiman, G. (2022) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.12753 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Vinayakumar, R., Alazab, M., Soman, K. P., Poornachandran, P., Al-Nemrat, A., & Venkatraman, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 41525-41550
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2926701059
- Cited by
- 1,946
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 102.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Learning Approach for Intelligent Intrusion Detection System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2895334
- The paper
- Vinayakumar, R., Alazab, M., Soman, K. P., Poornachandran, P., Al-Nemrat, A., & Venkatraman, S. (2019). Deep Learning Approach for Intelligent Intrusion Detection System. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2895334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.