The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increasing the Performance of Machine Learning-Based IDSs on an Imbalanced and Up-to-Date Dataset
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, due to the extensive use of the Internet, the number of networked computers has been increasing in our daily lives. Weaknesses of the servers enable hackers to intrude on computers by using not only known but also new attack-types, which are more sophisticated and harder to detect. To protect the computers from them, Intrusion Detection System (IDS), which is trained with some machine learning techniques by using a pre-collected dataset, is one of the most preferred protection mechanisms. The used datasets were collected during a limited period in some specific networks and generally don't contain up-to-date data. Additionally, they are imbalanced and cannot hold sufficient data for all types of attacks. These imbalanced and outdated datasets decrease the efficiency of current IDSs, especially for rarely encountered attack types. In this paper, we propose six machine-learning-based IDSs by using K Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Adaboost, Decision Tree, and Linear Discriminant Analysis algorithms. To implement a more realistic IDS, an up-to-date security dataset, CSE-CIC-IDS2018, is used instead of older and mostly worked datasets. The selected dataset is also imbalanced. Therefore, to increase the efficiency of the system depending on attack types and to decrease missed intrusions and false alarms, the imbalance ratio is reduced by using a synthetic data generation model called Synthetic Minority Oversampling TEchnique (SMOTE). Data generation is performed for minor classes, and their numbers are increased to the average data size via this technique. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed approach considerably increases the detection rate for rarely encountered intrusions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree
(2017) · HAL · Cited by 10,512
A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks
Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 · Cited by 7,515
Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions
Belgiu, M., & Drăguţ, L. (2016) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 · Cited by 7,142
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications · doi:10.1109/cisda.2009.5356528 · Cited by 5,396
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318
Moustafa, N., & Slay, J. (2015) · 2015 Military Communications and Information Systems Conference (MilCIS) · doi:10.1109/milcis.2015.7348942 · Cited by 4,033
Survey on deep learning with class imbalance
Johnson, J. M., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0192-5 · Cited by 3,032
Efficient kNN classification with different numbers of nearest neighbors
Zhang, S., Li, X., Zong, M., Zhu, X., & Wang, R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2673241 · Cited by 1,378
MWMOTE--Majority Weighted Minority Oversampling Technique for Imbalanced Data Set Learning
Barua, S., Islam, M. M., Yao, X., & Murase, K. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2012.232 · Cited by 1,150
A Detailed Investigation and Analysis of Using Machine Learning Techniques for Intrusion Detection
Mishra, P., Varadharajan, V., Tupakula, U., & Pilli, E. S. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2847722 · Cited by 738
Cited by
Ahmad, Z., Shahid Khan, A., Wai Shiang, C., Abdullah, J., & Ahmad, F. (2021) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.4150 · Cited by 1,288
InSDN: A Novel SDN Intrusion Dataset
Elsayed, M. S., Le-Khac, N.-A., & Jurcut, A. D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3022633 · Cited by 414
A survey and analysis of intrusion detection models based on CSE-CIC-IDS2018 Big Data
Leevy, J. L., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2020) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-020-00382-x · Cited by 264
Azam, Z., Islam, M. M., & Huda, M. N. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3296444 · Cited by 265
Fatema, K., Dey, S. K., Anannya, M., Khan, R. T., Rashid, M., Chunhua, S., & Mazumder, R. (2025) · doi:10.20944/preprints202503.1902.v1 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Karatas, G., Demir, O., & Sahingoz, O. K.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 32150-32162
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3006165800
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 20.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increasing the Performance of Machine Learning-Based IDSs on an Imbalanced and Up-to-Date Dataset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.2973219
- The paper
- Karatas, G., Demir, O., & Sahingoz, O. K. (2020). Increasing the Performance of Machine Learning-Based IDSs on an Imbalanced and Up-to-Date Dataset. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2973219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.