The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Dimensionality Reduction Techniques on Big Data
Open accessAbstract
Due to digitization, a huge volume of data is being generated across several sectors such as healthcare, production, sales, IoT devices, Web, organizations. Machine learning algorithms are used to uncover patterns among the attributes of this data. Hence, they can be used to make predictions that can be used by medical practitioners and people at managerial level to make executive decisions. Not all the attributes in the datasets generated are important for training the machine learning algorithms. Some attributes might be irrelevant and some might not affect the outcome of the prediction. Ignoring or removing these irrelevant or less important attributes reduces the burden on machine learning algorithms. In this work two of the prominent dimensionality reduction techniques, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are investigated on four popular Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, Decision Tree Induction, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes Classifier and Random Forest Classifier using publicly available Cardiotocography (CTG) dataset from University of California and Irvine Machine Learning Repository. The experimentation results prove that PCA outperforms LDA in all the measures. Also, the performance of the classifiers, Decision Tree, Random Forest examined is not affected much by using PCA and LDA.To further analyze the performance of PCA and LDA the eperimentation is carried out on Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) and Intrusion Detection System (IDS) datasets. Experimentation results prove that ML algorithms with PCA produce better results when dimensionality of the datasets is high. When dimensionality of datasets is low it is observed that the ML algorithms without dimensionality reduction yields better results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Ensemble methods in machine learning
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 · Cited by 8,408
FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography
Ayres‐de‐Campos, D., Spong, C. Y., Chandraharan, E., & Panel, F. I. F. M. E. C. (2015) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020 · Cited by 911
Cheng, C.-A., & Chiu, H.-W. (2017) · 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2017.8037381 · Cited by 73
Cited by
Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications
Maddikunta, P. K. R., Pham, Q.-V., B, P., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257 · Cited by 1,890
Self-citationR.M., S. P., Maddikunta, P. K. R., M., P., Koppu, S., Gadekallu, T. R., Chowdhary, C. L., & Alazab, M. (2020) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.05.048 · Cited by 470
Self-citationHarnessing the power of synthetic data in healthcare: innovation, application, and privacy
Giuffrè, M., & Shung, D. L. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00927-3 · Cited by 392
Ramu, S. P., Boopalan, P., Pham, Q.-V., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Huynh-The, T., Alazab, M., Nguyen, T. T., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2022) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103663 · Cited by 301
A Multidirectional LSTM Model for Predicting the Stability of a Smart Grid
Alazab, M., Khan, S., Krishnan, S. S. R., Pham, Q.-V., Reddy, M. P. K., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2991067 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, G. T., Reddy, M. P. K., Lakshmanna, K., Kaluri, R., Rajput, D. S., Srivastava, G., & Baker, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 54776-54788
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3011249019
- Cited by
- 877
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 87.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Dimensionality Reduction Techniques on Big Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.2980942
- The paper
- Reddy, G. T., Reddy, M. P. K., Lakshmanna, K., Kaluri, R., Rajput, D. S., Srivastava, G., & Baker, T. (2020). Analysis of Dimensionality Reduction Techniques on Big Data. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2980942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.