Cited by 87Smart Cities and TechnologiesICT in Developing CommunitiesRural development and sustainability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of Smart Rural Village Indicators in Line With Industry 4.0

Open access
Maja, Pontsho William, Meyer, Johan, Von Solms, Sune·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

In 1950, approximately 1.8 billion lived in rural areas and subsequently, rural population growth averaged 1.0 per cent per year, with the result that the rural population nearly doubled, reaching 3.4 billion in 2018 and is expected to peak in 2021 at just over 3.4 billion. Rural villages are lacking behind urban areas when it come to the stages of industrial revolutions and societal development with respect to technological advancement. Today, the world is faced with the new wave of advanced technological revolution called Industry 4.0. Despite the impressive work being implemented successfully to create smart cities and smart villages in various countries, there are still no developed standard indicators that can be used to define smart rural village concept. The objective of the study is to develop indicators for smart rural villages aligned with Industry 4.0 technologies using systematic literature review, the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, as well as the ISO 37122, smart cities indicator's standard. The translation method developed prioritized indicators according to sustainability, smartness and connectivity from the Information and Communication Technology. The main contribution is the method and indicators developed over 2-year period for smart rural villages. The resulting indicators makes it possible to answer what a smart rural village is: village that has access to affordable energy, adequate housing, safe drinking water, an inquisitive rural culture, early warning systems against adverse weather conditions, against drinking water pollution as well as the predictable schedule for local doctor, taxi/bus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.3017441

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.2307/258959 · DOI · Paper page
  2. bossel, 1999, Indicators for Sustainable Development Theory Method Application
  3. wolski, 2018, Smart villages in EU policy: How to match innovativeness and pragmatism?, Wie? Rolnictwo, 181, 163, 10.53098/wir042018/09 · DOI
  4. 10.1108/9781787698451 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.287 · DOI
  6. prause, 2015, Smart rural development, Agricultural Economics and Management, 4, 63
  7. 10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444 · DOI
  8. holmes, 2017, The smart villages initiative: Findings 2014–2017, Smart Villages Program Energy as a Catalyst for Development
  9. sutriadi, 2018, Defining smart city, smart region, smart village, and technopolis as an innovative concept in Indonesia’s urban and regional development themes to reach sustainability, Proc IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 202
  10. syaodih, 2019, Smart village development, Proc 9th Int Conf Rural Res Planning Group, 22
  11. fitsilis, 2018, 17, 40
  12. 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1109/IMIS.2013.79 · DOI
  14. 10.7896/j.1209 · DOI
  15. gilchrist, 2016, Industry 4 0 The Industrial Internet of Things
  16. kamarul bahrin, 2016, Industry 4.0: A review on industrial automation and robotic, Jurnal Teknologi, 78, 137, 10.11113/jt.v78.9285 · DOI
  17. troxler, 2013, Making the 3rd industrial revolution, FabLabs Of Machines Makers and Inventors
  18. 10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0_8 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/ICITSI.2018.8696029 · DOI
  20. schwab, 2016, The Fourth Industrial Revolution
  21. 10.1109/HICSS.2012.615 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.03.003 · DOI
  23. sutriadi, 2018, Defining smart city, smart region, smart village, and technopolis as an innovative concept in indonesia’s urban and regional development themes to reach sustainability, Proc IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 202
  24. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006 · DOI
  25. 2018, World Urbanization Prospects The 2018 Revision
  26. 2002, Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development
  27. dahlman, 2016, A new paradigm for rural development, Debate the Issues New Approaches to Economic Challenges, 10.1787/9789264264687-25-en · DOI
  28. 10.1109/MCE.2016.2556879 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1109/IEMENTECH.2017.8077008 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/AUPEC.2018.8757912 · DOI
  31. muula, 2007, How do we define ‘rurality’ in the teaching on medical demography?, Rural Remote Health, 7, 653
  32. 10.1007/s11205-016-1473-4 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.077 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.200 · DOI
  35. 10.3390/su10072559 · DOI
  36. 10.1145/2037556.2037602 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/isd2.12025 · DOI
  38. 10.2139/ssrn.3038310 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/0199253498.001.0001 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.esd.2018.01.005 · DOI
  42. patrick, 2016, OECD Insights Debate the Issues New Approaches to Economic Challenges
  43. 10.1108/IJSHE-01-2019-0020 · DOI
  44. 10.1504/IJSD.2005.007372 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1177/0170840603024001341 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 87

Metadata

Authors
Maja, P. W., Meyer, J., & Von Solms, S.
Affiliations
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
152017-152033
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3077298496
Cited by
87
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
12.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Rural development and sustainability
Keywords
Industry 4.0, rural development, 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, smart cities, indicator prioritization, sustainability, connectivity, information and communication technologies, rural energy access, drinking water safety, early warning systems, rural healthcare access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review