Cited by 2,599Smart Cities and TechnologiesInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentE-Government and Public Services

Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework

Chourabi, Hafedh, Nam, Taewoo, Walker, Shawn, Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon, Mellouli, Sehl, Nahon, Karine, Pardo, Theresa A., Scholl, Hans Jochen·2012·2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Abstract

Making a city "smart" is emerging as a strategy to mitigate the problems generated by the urban population growth and rapid urbanization. Yet little academic research has sparingly discussed the phenomenon. To close the gap in the literature about smart cities and in response to the increasing use of the concept, this paper proposes a framework to understand the concept of smart cities. Based on the exploration of a wide and extensive array of literature from various disciplinary areas we identify eight critical factors of smart city initiatives: management and organization, technology, governance, policy context, people and communities, economy, built infrastructure, and natural environment. These factors form the basis of an integrative framework that can be used to examine how local governments are envisioning smart city initiatives. The framework suggests directions and agendas for smart city research and outlines practical implications for government professionals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/hicss.2012.615

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • State University of New York (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-01
Pages
2289-2297
ISSN
1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010772936
Cited by
2,599
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 155 · 2023: 205 · 2022: 213 · 2021: 275 · 2020: 294 · 2019: 293 · 2018: 279 · 2017: 209 · 2016: 205 · 2015: 153 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 5
FWCI
166.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (publishedVersion)
  • Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Natural Resources Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
Keywords
smart cities, smart city initiatives, integrative framework, urbanization, local government, governance, urban policy, physical infrastructure, natural environment, community participation, urban economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review