Cited by 19Electric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Heavy-Duty Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using Random Power Prediction Method

Open access
Chen, Luming, Liao, Zili, Ma, Xiaojun·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

A primary challenge to the implementation of hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) is the design of the energy management strategy for the vehicle. Most conventional strategies have been designed for passenger vehicles using rule-based or optimization-based control strategies that rely on navigation support; therefore, the optimal performance of heavy-duty HEVs that lack navigation support cannot be achieved using conventional strategies. In this study, we propose a nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) for heavy-duty HEVs based on a random power prediction method. To obtain the models of multiple power sources, we analyzed the structure and powertrain of the vehicle using mathematical modeling methods. To account for the lack of navigation support, we used the data-driven prediction method by combining the grey model and Markov chain methods to obtain higher-accuracy ultra-short-term power prediction. Considering the predicted disturbance power, we established a multi-objective optimization function with explicit constraints to optimize fuel consumption, bus voltage, and battery state of charge. Under these constraints, a nonlinear programming problem based on the NMPC could be restricted to find an optimal numerical solution in real time. We validated the control strategy on a hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform and compared its results with those obtained using thermostat control, fuzzy, and dynamic programming approaches. The proposed control strategy achieved a considerably better all-round performance than rule-based control strategies; moreover, the results were considerably similar compared with those of offline global optimization strategies. Furthermore, the proposed method achieved excellent real-time operation capability, thereby providing a valuable reference for practical engineering applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.3036644

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The four driving cycles FTP75, LA92, UDDS, and HWFET are extensively utilized in scholarly research focused on EV simulation and performance evaluations.

    “Each of these driving cycles is extensively utilized in scholarly research focused on EV simulation and performance evaluations.(Chen et al., 2020;Peng et al., 2019;Karavalakis et al., 2013;Liu et al., 2016)”

    From State-of-charge estimation of commercial electric vehicles by using battery-aware transformer network algorithms (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2020

    In the Grey Markov Chain Framework and Results and Discussions (page numbers unavailable), Chen et al. use HWFET to evaluate a simulated heavy-duty hybrid electric vehicle. The cited passages do not establish extensive use across scholarly research or address FTP75, LA92, and UDDS; the other cycle used here is HUDDS, not UDDS. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, L., Liao, Z., & Ma, X.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
202819-202835
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3103698355
Cited by
19
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51507190)
  • Weapons and Equipment Pre-Research Project of China (301051102)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
nonlinear model predictive control, energy management strategy, grey prediction model, Markov chains, multi-objective optimization, fuel consumption, battery state of charge, bus voltage, real-time optimization, hardware-in-the-loop

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review