The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Software Defect Prediction Using Ensemble Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in the domain of software defect prediction (SDP) include the integration of multiple classification techniques to create an ensemble or hybrid approach. This technique was introduced to improve the prediction performance by overcoming the limitations of any single classification technique. This research provides a systematic literature review on the use of the ensemble learning approach for software defect prediction. The review is conducted after critically analyzing research papers published since 2012 in four well-known online libraries: ACM, IEEE, Springer Link, and Science Direct. In this study, five research questions covering the different aspects of research progress on the use of ensemble learning for software defect prediction are addressed. To extract the answers to identified questions, 46 most relevant papers are shortlisted after a thorough systematic research process. This study will provide compact information regarding the latest trends and advances in ensemble learning for software defect prediction and provide a baseline for future innovations and further reviews. Through our study, we discovered that frequently employed ensemble methods by researchers are the random forest, boosting, and bagging. Less frequently employed methods include stacking, voting and Extra Trees. Researchers proposed many promising frameworks, such as EMKCA, SMOTE-Ensemble, MKEL, SDAEsTSE, TLEL, and LRCR, using ensemble learning methods. The AUC, accuracy, F-measure, Recall, Precision, and MCC were mostly utilized to measure the prediction performance of models. WEKA was widely adopted as a platform for machine learning. Many researchers showed through empirical analysis that features selection, and data sampling was necessary pre-processing steps that improve the performance of ensemble classifiers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical pattern recognition: a review
Jain, A. K., Duin, P. W., & Mao, J. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.824819 · Cited by 6,767
Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering—A Systematic Literature Review
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 · Cited by 4,537
Galar, M., Fernandez, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., & Herrera, F. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2161285 · Cited by 2,794
Rotation Forest: A New Classifier Ensemble Method
Rodriguez, J. J., Kuncheva, L. I., & Alonso, C. J. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.211 · Cited by 1,893
Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric
Boughorbel, S., Jarray, F., & El-Anbari, M. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177678 · Cited by 1,222 · cited 1×
“account all true and false positives and negatives to determine the quality of binary classification [14].”
BackgroundQazi, A., Hussain, F., Rahim, N. A., Hardaker, G., Alghazzawi, D., Shaban, K., & Haruna, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2906402 · Cited by 1,153
Ensemble approaches for regression: A survey
Mendes-Moreira, J., Soares, C., Jorge, A. M., & Sousa, J. F. D. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2379776.2379786 · Cited by 667
Using Class Imbalance Learning for Software Defect Prediction
Wang, S., & Yao, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2013.2259203 · Cited by 571
A systematic review of search-based testing for non-functional system properties
Afzal, W., Torkar, R., & Feldt, R. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.12.005 · Cited by 447
A Comparison of Decision Tree Ensemble Creation Techniques
Banfield, R. E., Hall, L. O., Bowyer, K. W., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.250609 · Cited by 383
Cited by
Maurício, J., Domingues, I., & Bernardino, J. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13095521 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Matloob, F., Ghazal, T. M., Taleb, N., Aftab, S., Ahmad, M., Khan, M. A., Abbas, S., & Soomro, T. R.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 98754-98771
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3182306886
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Software Defect Prediction Using Ensemble Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2021.3095559
- The paper
- Matloob, F., Ghazal, T. M., Taleb, N., Aftab, S., Ahmad, M., Khan, M. A., Abbas, S., & Soomro, T. R. (2021). Software Defect Prediction Using Ensemble Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3095559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.