Cited by 212IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AIIoT-based Smart Home Systems

A Review of Security Standards and Frameworks for IoT-Based Smart Environments

Open access
Karie, Nickson M., Sahri, Nor Masri, Yang, Wencheng, Valli, Craig, Kebande, Victor R.·2021·IEEE Access

Abstract

Assessing the security of IoT-based smart environments such as smart homes and smart cities is becoming fundamentally essential to implementing the correct control measures and effectively reducing security threats and risks brought about by deploying IoT-based smart technologies. The problem, however, is in finding security standards and assessment frameworks that best meets the security requirements as well as comprehensively assesses and exposes the security posture of IoT-based smart environments. To explore this gap, this paper presents a review of existing security standards and assessment frameworks which also includes several NIST special publications on security techniques highlighting their primary areas of focus to uncover those that can potentially address some of the security needs of IoT-based smart environments. Cumulatively a total of 80 ISO/IEC security standards, 32 ETSI standards and 37 different conventional security assessment frameworks which included seven NIST special publications on security techniques were reviewed. To present an all-inclusive and up-to-date state-of-the-art research, the review process considered both published security standards and assessment frameworks as well as those under development. The findings show that most of the conventional security standards and assessment frameworks do not directly address the security needs of IoT-based smart environments but have the potential to be adapted into IoT-based smart environments. With t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3109886

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Misuse and abuse of data mining may lead to the disclosure of user data, especially sensitive information.

    “However, misuse and abuse of data mining may lead to the disclosure of user data, especially sensitive information [16].”
  • The data-centric protocol prioritizes the transmission of critical health information, while the content-centric network improves the distribution efficiency of health information between IoT devices.

    “The data-centric protocol prioritizes the transmission of critical health information, while the content-centric network improves the distribution efficiency of health information between IoT devices [16].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karie, N. M., Sahri, N. M., Yang, W., Valli, C., & Kebande, V. R.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
121975-121995
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3196833029
Cited by
212
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 17
FWCI
14.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Epubl LTU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Cyber Security Research Centre Ltd., funded through the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT-based Smart Home Systems
Keywords
Internet of Things security, smart environments, security standards, security assessment framework, home automation, smart cities, security posture assessment, IoT security challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review