A Review of Security Standards and Frameworks for IoT-Based Smart Environments
Open accessAbstract
Assessing the security of IoT-based smart environments such as smart homes and smart cities is becoming fundamentally essential to implementing the correct control measures and effectively reducing security threats and risks brought about by deploying IoT-based smart technologies. The problem, however, is in finding security standards and assessment frameworks that best meets the security requirements as well as comprehensively assesses and exposes the security posture of IoT-based smart environments. To explore this gap, this paper presents a review of existing security standards and assessment frameworks which also includes several NIST special publications on security techniques highlighting their primary areas of focus to uncover those that can potentially address some of the security needs of IoT-based smart environments. Cumulatively a total of 80 ISO/IEC security standards, 32 ETSI standards and 37 different conventional security assessment frameworks which included seven NIST special publications on security techniques were reviewed. To present an all-inclusive and up-to-date state-of-the-art research, the review process considered both published security standards and assessment frameworks as well as those under development. The findings show that most of the conventional security standards and assessment frameworks do not directly address the security needs of IoT-based smart environments but have the potential to be adapted into IoT-based smart environments. With t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Misuse and abuse of data mining may lead to the disclosure of user data, especially sensitive information.
“However, misuse and abuse of data mining may lead to the disclosure of user data, especially sensitive information [16].”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
The data-centric protocol prioritizes the transmission of critical health information, while the content-centric network improves the distribution efficiency of health information between IoT devices.
“The data-centric protocol prioritizes the transmission of critical health information, while the content-centric network improves the distribution efficiency of health information between IoT devices [16].”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
IoT Privacy and Security: Challenges and Solutions
Tawalbeh, L., Muheidat, F., Tawalbeh, M., & Quwaider, M. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10124102 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations
Joint Task Force Interagency Working Group (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-53r5 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative (2018) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-37r2 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
An introduction to information security
Nieles, M., Dempsey, K., & Pillitteri, V. Y. (2017) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-12r1 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends
Sun, P., Shen, S., Wan, Y., Wu, Z., Fang, Z., & Gao, X.-Z. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3372518 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Szymanski, T. H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3169137 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karie, N. M., Sahri, N. M., Yang, W., Valli, C., & Kebande, V. R.
- Affiliations
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Luleå University of Technology (SE)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 121975-121995
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3196833029
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 17
- FWCI
- 14.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Epubl LTU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Cyber Security Research Centre Ltd., funded through the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Programme
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT-based Smart Home Systems
- Keywords
- Internet of Things security, smart environments, security standards, security assessment framework, home automation, smart cities, security posture assessment, IoT security challenges
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review