The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 177 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 50 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we present a comprehensive study with an experimental analysis of federated deep learning approaches for cyber security in the Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Specifically, we first provide a review of the federated learning-based security and privacy systems for several types of IoT applications, including, Industrial IoT, Edge Computing, Internet of Drones, Internet of Healthcare Things, Internet of Vehicles, etc. Second, the use of federated learning with blockchain and malware/intrusion detection systems for IoT applications is discussed. Then, we review the vulnerabilities in federated learning-based security and privacy systems. Finally, we provide an experimental analysis of federated deep learning with three deep learning approaches, namely, Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Deep Neural Network (DNN). For each deep learning model, we study the performance of centralized and federated learning under three new real IoT traffic datasets, namely, the Bot-IoT dataset, the MQTTset dataset, and the TON_IoT dataset. The goal of this article is to provide important information on federated deep learning approaches with emerging technologies for cyber security. In addition, it demonstrates that federated deep learning approaches outperform the classic/centralized versions of machine learning (non-federated learning) in assuring the privacy of IoT device data and provide the higher accuracy in detecting attacks.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper surveys federated deep learning for IoT cyber security and adds an experimental comparison of centralized vs. federated DNN, CNN, and RNN intrusion detection models on three IoT traffic datasets. It concludes that federated learning improves privacy and can approach or outperform centralized learning, though its own reported centralized accuracies are often higher than the federated global-model results.
Key findings
- The review covers federated learning-based security and privacy systems across Industrial IoT, edge computing, Internet of Drones, Internet of Healthcare Things, Internet of Vehicles, cloud computing, 5G-enabled IoT, mobile crowdsensing, and cyber-physical systems; it also discusses federated learning with blockchain and federated intrusion/malware detection.
- In centralized experiments, the highest accuracies were RNN on Bot-IoT at 96.76%, DNN on MQTTset at 90.06%, and RNN on TON_IoT at 99.98%; the lowest were DNN on Bot-IoT at 95.76%, RNN on MQTTset at 89.29%, and CNN on TON_IoT at 98.87%.
- In federated experiments, IID global models approximated centralized performance; Non-IID models struggled initially but after 50 rounds approached centralized performance. For Bot-IoT with CNN and K=15, the worst client had 01.00% accuracy at the first round, 52.98% at round 50, while the global model achieved 90.35%.
- The paper states that federated deep learning approaches outperform classic/centralized machine learning in assuring IoT data privacy and provide higher accuracy in detecting attacks, although the experimental comparison text reports that federated global models “managed to approach” centralized performance.
Methods
- Design: comprehensive survey plus experimental analysis training three deep learning IDS models—DNN, CNN, and RNN—under centralized and federated learning settings.
- Data: three real IoT traffic datasets—Bot-IoT (69.3 GB PCAP, over 72 million records; CSV files used), MQTTset, and TON_IoT—with preprocessing including dropping selected features, one-hot encoding of `proto`, and Z-score normalization.
- Federated setup and analysis: Sherpa.AI framework on Google Colaboratory with NumPy, Pandas, TensorFlow, and Keras; client distributions K=5, K=10, and K=15; IID and Non-IID data distributions; 50 federated rounds; metrics include accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC curves.
Limitations
- Paper-stated open challenges include: privacy can still be revealed by analyzing the global model; differential privacy can degrade performance or require high computing power; IoT network constraints such as bandwidth, interference, noise, and limited reliability; data bias and unequal data sizes across devices; and lack of FL-specific IoT frameworks.
- Evident from the text: the experiments use pre-existing public datasets with engineered partitions to mimic federations because of a lack of FL-specific datasets; experiments were run on Google Colab; source code is available only upon request; and the conclusion that federated learning provides higher attack-detection accuracy is not fully supported by the paper’s own centralized-vs-federated accuracy results, which show federated global models approaching rather than consistently exceeding centralized models.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 50 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, it demonstrates that federated deep learning approaches outperform the classic/centralized versions of machine learning (non-federated learning) in assuring the privacy of IoT device data and provide the higher accuracy in detecting attacks.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, it demonstrates that federated deep learning approaches outperform the classic/centralized versions of machine learning (non-federated learning) in assuring the privacy of IoT device data and provide the higher accuracy in detecting attacks.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Almost all of the surveys on federated learning for IoT applications present security and privacy countermeasures without focusing on an experimental analysis.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > B. RELATED SURVEYS AND OUR CONTRIBUTIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All these related surveys did not cover the application of federated deep learning for cyber security in IoT applications with focusing on experimental analysis.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > B. RELATED SURVEYS AND OUR CONTRIBUTIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the IID data distribution strategy, the federated deep learning global models were able to approximate the performance of the centralized learning models.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 2) FEDERATED LEARNING MODELS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fig 15 presents the ROC curves for five classes in the MQTTset dataset, namely: class Bruteforce, class DoS, class Flood, class Benign, and class Slowite.All values are between 0.94 and 0.98.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > D. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second observation is that at the 50 th rounds of federated deep learning, the performance of all global models managed to approach the performance of the centralized model.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 2) FEDERATED LEARNING MODELS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fig 14 presents the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for five classes in the BoT-IoT dataset, namely: class DDoS, class DoS, class Benign, class Reconnaissance, and class Theft.All values are between 0.99 and 1.00.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > D. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first observation is that in the IID data distribution strategy, the Best, Worst, and Global models are closely related to each other consistently across all settings and datasets, even though the clients are trained from different class samples.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 2) FEDERATED LEARNING MODELS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the Non-IID case, at the first FL round, the Best, Worst, and Global models are nowhere near one another, and this is quite expected since not all clients were trained from all classes.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 2) FEDERATED LEARNING MODELS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 20
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the non-IDI data distribution strategy, the global models struggled a bit to perform the same as in IID, which is quite normal since the data samples were randomly distributed for all clients, however after 50 FL runs, the overall performance was pretty good.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 2) FEDERATED LEARNING MODELS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The highest accuracy for the TON_IoT dataset was obtained using the RNN classifier which achieved 99.98%, while the lowest accuracy was obtained using the CNN classifier with 98.87%.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > D. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The highest accuracy for the Bot-IoT dataset was obtained using the RNN classifier which achieved 96.76%, while the lowest accuracy was obtained using the DNN classifier with 95.76%.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > D. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The simulation results show that the proposed CrowdSFL protocol can resist the following malicious behaviors: Malicious miners, Malicious workers, and Malicious requesters.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > B. PERMISSIONLESS BLOCKCHAIN-BASED SOLUTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [100] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Compared to the conventional FedAvg approach [83], the proposed system can reduce significantly the computation time of the users as well as the latency of the system.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > I. SECURE INTERNET OF VEHICLES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82] Zhang, 2021, FedSky: An efficient and privacy-preserving scheme for federated mobile crowdsensing, IEEE Internet Things J.
- Not checked yetcites [83] McMahan, 2016, Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data, arXiv:1602.05629
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Accordingly, many existing systems already contain vulnerable IoT devices that are open to being compromised, which is furthermore harmful in sensitive tasks such as surveillance, as shown by the work of Ciuonzo et al. [59], which focused on the issue of distributed detection of a non-cooperative object in a wireless sensor network.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > A. DETECTING COMPROMISED IoT DEVICES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ciuonzo et al. [59] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Many IoT devices are susceptible to attack through unsafe design, deployment, and configurations.
In the paper
“the results show that the FedAGRU system provides less communication overhead with higher detection accuracy.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > VOLUME 9, 2021
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [96] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the absence of a credible security defense systems implemented on the IoT devices, they can be attacked by hackers [2] and are representing a large attack surface that is actively exploited.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > I. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The federated learning achieves great success and is widely used in many fields, e.g., mobile edge network optimization [18], Google keyboard query suggestions and prediction [19], [20], COVID-19 detection [21]- [23], vehicles communications [24], Internet of Drones [25], Augmented reality [26], Intrusion detection [27]- [29] etc.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > I. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] source
- Not checked yetcites [19] 2021
- Not checked yetcites [20] Hard, 2018, Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction, arXiv:1811.03604
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The simulation results on two real-world data sets (i.e., Reuters dataset and 20 newsgroups dataset) show that the proposed system can guarantee the quality of shared data as well as differential privacy.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > A. PERMISSIONED BLOCKCHAIN-BASED SOLUTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The performance evaluation under the gas pipeline system dataset show the following results: F-score = 98.14 %, recall = 97.47 %, precision = 98.85 %, accuracy = 99.20 %, which are better compared to three related works [57], [95], and [77]”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > A. FEDERATED LEARNING-BASED ANOMALY DETECTION
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although some techniques have been used to overcome this problem, including differential privacy [166], these approaches degrade model performance or require additional conditions that are not suitable for IoT networks, especially high computing power [167].”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > B. OPEN CHALLENGES AND CONSIDERATIONS 1) SECURITY AND PRIVACY CHALLENGES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They are chosen specifically because they are build from heterogeneous data sources as well as collected from IoT and IIoT sensor telemetry datasets.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > B. DATASETS DESCRIPTION AND PRE-PROCESSING
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This combination reduces the threat of data leakage and enables data owners to have more control over the access to stored and shared data.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 3) WHEN FEDERATED LEARNING MEETS BLOCKCHAIN
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results demonstrate that federated deep learning approaches can outperform the classic/centralized versions of machine learning (non-federated learning) in assuring the privacy of IoT device data and provides the highest accuracy in detecting attacks.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > VIII. CONCLUSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The performance evaluation on two real-world datasets, namely, MovieLens and Netflix, demonstrates that the proposed idea can not only identify shilling hackers but also improve the performance of recommendations significantly.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > G. SHILLING ATTACK
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The study shows that the federated deep learning-based security and privacy systems can be applied for several types of IoT applications, including, Industrial Internet of Things, Edge Computing, Internet of Drones, Internet of Healthcare Things, Cloud Computing, 5G-enabled IoT, Internet of Vehicles, Mobile Crowdsensing, etc.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > A. IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY 1) IoT APPLICATIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, and most importantly, privacy issues, since it requires data to be collected at a single entity, thus making it easier for an attacker to target a single location for all data, if that single entity is compromised, all sensitive data will be breached.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 3) COMPARISON
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, communication channels and computational power are constrained in terms of capacity, as well as the presence of various network issues such as bandwidth, interference, and noise [167].”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 2) IoT NETWORK SETTINGS CHALLENGES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [167] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This dataset is introduced by the IoT Lab of the UNSW Canberra Cyber, the School of Engineering and Information technology (SEIT), UNSW Canberra at the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) [150] for the collection and analysis of mixed data sources from IoT and Industrial IoT (IIoT).”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 3) TON_IoT DATASET
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [150] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Federated learning-based intrusion detection systems, on the other hand, significantly decrease the previous issues with decent detection accuracy, and in many cases, it approached the performance of a centralized approach as we showed with our federated deep learning models.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 3) COMPARISON
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Throughout the performance evaluation on a SCADA dataset, the results show that the proposed system can classify with a binary cross-entropy loss score of 0.47 and an accuracy of 95.55 %.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > E. ADVERSARIAL ATTACK
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [122] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The BoT-IoT dataset was produced at the Cyber Range Lab at UNSW Canberra as a result of building a real-life network environment integrating a mix of normal and botnet traffic [154], [160]- [164].”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > B. DATASETS DESCRIPTION AND PRE-PROCESSING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [154] source
- Not checked yetcites [160]-[164]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, if IoT devices have varying data sizes, the FL-based system may give more importance to the contributions of the populations.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > 3) DATA-RELATED CHALLENGES
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“2) MQTTset DATASET introduced by Vaccari et al. [156] to address the lack of support for specific protocols that IoT environments are currently using.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > B. DATASETS DESCRIPTION AND PRE-PROCESSING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [156] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, due to the lack of FL-specific datasets, any pre-existing public dataset with engineered partitions can be used to mimic data federations, as employed in our experiment.”
§ Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis > B. DATASETS DESCRIPTION AND PRE-PROCESSING
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Many cyber security researchers have difficulty in finding the best learning type (centralized or federated) to test and evaluate their proposed security methods in IoT applications.
“Therefore, many cyber security researchers have difficulty in finding the best learning type (i.e., centralized or federated learning) to test and evaluate their proposed security methods in IoT applications, and selecting an appropriate federated deep learning method is an essential issue in this field.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Selecting an appropriate federated deep learning method is an essential issue in this field.
“Therefore, many cyber security researchers have difficulty in finding the best learning type (i.e., centralized or federated learning) to test and evaluate their proposed security methods in IoT applications, and selecting an appropriate federated deep learning method is an essential issue in this field.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional centralized learning has issues such as privacy, latency, bandwidth, and connectivity.
“However, there are some issues for traditional centralized learning such as privacy, latency, bandwidth, and connectivity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many IoT devices are susceptible to attack through unsafe design, deployment, and configurations.
“Many of those devices, however, are susceptible to attack through unsafe design, deployment, and configurations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Federated learning can suffer from machine learning attacks against the locally created models.
“Since it is trained on sensitive user data, federated learning can suffer from machine learning attacks against the locally created models.”
The paper relies on this without support.
FL-based tasks require the data distribution to be Non-IID and unbalanced, reflecting the properties of the real-world scenario.
“FL-based tasks require the data distribution to be Non-Independent and Identically Distributed (Non-IID) and unbalanced, which reflects the properties of the real-world scenario.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Adversaries can use cyber security attacks such as adversarial attacks or poisoning attacks to degrade the accuracy of a machine learning model or deduce if an IoT device has been involved in some mission from their local model updates.
“These adversaries can use cyber security attacks such as adversarial attacks or poisoning attacks to degrading the accuracy of a machine learning model or deduce if an IoT device has been involved in some mission from their local model updates.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the communication cost is reduced by uploading only gradients rather than larger datasets [48].”
From Federated Learning for Privacy Preservation in Smart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
FedAGRU is attributed to different cited authors
MinorOne passage attributes the proposed FedAGRU system to Cvitic et al. [29] [88], while an earlier passage says Cetin et al. [96] proposed FedAGRU.
“Based on a boosting method of logistic model trees, Cvitic et al. [29] [88] proposed a federated learning-based intrusion detection system, named FedAGRU, which employs gated recurrent units (GRUs) models.”
“Cetin et al. [96] proposed an IDS, named FedAGRU, which is based on federated learning.”
Dataset citations do not match the numbered references
MinorThe dataset discussion cites [149] for TON_IoT, but reference 149 is titled "LEAF: A benchmark for federated settings"; the TON_IoT reference is numbered 150. The same one-number mismatch affects the cited Bot-IoT and MQTTset references.
“For evaluating FL-based cyber security solutions in IoT networks, the security research community uses the following three datasets: TON_IoT [149], Bot-IoT [154], and MQTTset [156].”
“149. S. Caldas, S. M. K. Duddu, P. Wu, T. Li, J. Konečnỳ, H. B. McMahan, V. Smith, and A. Talwalkar, ''LEAF: A benchmark for federated settings,'' 2018, arXiv:1812.01097.”
TON_IoT figure lists six classes after stating five
MinorThe discussion says Fig 16 presents ROC curves for five TON_IoT classes, but the figure caption enumerates classes 0 through 5, including XSS as a sixth class.
“Fig 16 presents the ROC curves for five classes in the TON_IoT dataset, namely: class Backdoor, class Injection, class Benign, class Password, and class Scanning.”
“Figure: 16 FIGURE 16 . FIGURE 16.The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for TON_IOT dataset.(class 0: Backdoor, class 1: Injection, class 2: Benign, class 3: Password, class 4: Scanning, class 5: XSS.)”
Research questions are attributed to the learning-performance figure
MinorThe text points to Fig 17 for the research questions, but the caption identifies Fig 17 as learning performances.
“In this context, we highlight the following research questions (i.e., Fig 17 that need to be solved:”
“Figure: 17 FIGURE 17 . FIGURE 17. Learning performances.”
MQTTset figure lists six classes after stating five
MinorThe discussion says Fig 15 presents ROC curves for five MQTTset classes, but the figure caption enumerates classes 0 through 5, including Malformed as a sixth class.
“Fig 15 presents the ROC curves for five classes in the MQTTset dataset, namely: class Bruteforce, class DoS, class Flood, class Benign, and class Slowite.”
“Figure: 15 FIGURE 15 . FIGURE 15.The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for MQTTset datasets.(class 0: Bruteforce, class 1: DoS, class 2: Flood, class 3: Benign, class 4: Slowite, class 5: Malformed.)”
Citations
Cites
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,889
GAN（Generative Adversarial Nets）
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 20,507
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05629 · Cited by 14,215
Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning
Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.04977 · Cited by 7,857
Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning
Kairouz, P., & McMahan, H. B. (2021) · Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000083 · Cited by 7,772
Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applications
Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3298981 · Cited by 6,322
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications · doi:10.1109/cisda.2009.5356528 · Cited by 5,396
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318 · cited 1×
“Security researchers use cyber security datasets such as NSL-KDD [152] and CICIDS 2017-2018 [153] for the”
MethodPractical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning
Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Goodfellow, I., Jha, S., Celik, Z. B., & Swami, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3052973.3053009 · Cited by 3,495
Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
Lim, W. Y. B., Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Jiao, Y., Liang, Y.-C., Yang, Q., Niyato, D., & Miao, C. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2986024 · Cited by 2,565
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- McMahan, 2017, Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data, Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 1273
- 2021, Federated Learning: Collaborative Machine Learning Without Centralized Training Data
- Schneble, Attack detection using federated learning in medical cyber-physical systems, 1
- Goodfellow, Generative adversarial nets, 27, 1
- 2021, The MNIST Database of Handwritten Digits
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 364
Paul, S., Mitra, A., Shambhavi, S., Ghosh, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2025) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.503 · Cited by 4
SecFedDNN: A Secure Federated Deep Learning Framework for Edge–Cloud Environments
Alamir, R. H., Noor, A., Almukhalfi, H. M., Almukhlifi, R., & Noor, T. H. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13060463 · Cited by 4
Enhancing Security in Connected Medical IoT Networks Through Deep Learning-Based Anomaly Detection
Sy, I., Diouf, B., Diop, A. K., Drocourt, C., & Durand, D. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52426-4_7 · Cited by 4
Detecting malicious attacks using Cyber-security models using Deep learning approachPreprint
Alamyar, A. M., Li, W., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3160305/v1 · Cited by 4
Kamalakannan, S., Saravanan, V., Shankar, B. M., & Kumar, N. (2025) · Journal of Circuits Systems and Computers · doi:10.1142/s0218126625503621 · Cited by 3
Mitigating DDoS attacks on the internet of things using federated learning
Shirvani, G., Ghasemshirazi, S., & Azgomi, M. A. (2025) · Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications · doi:10.1007/s12083-025-02001-z · Cited by 3
DDoS Attack Detection in Business Blockchain Networks: A Review, Framework, and Challenges
Li, M., Chen, J., Guo, S., Qiu, X., & Qi, F. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnse.2025.3588625 · Cited by 3
Efficient security service function chaining based on federated learning in edge networks
Jia, Y., Yu, J., Liang, L., Fang, F., & Wen, W. (2025) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2025.108285 · Cited by 3
Gogia, K., Narula, R., Bansal, K., & Arora, A. (2025) · International Conference on Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (ICICV) · doi:10.1109/icicv64824.2025.11085845 · Cited by 3
Gulati, S., Guleria, K., Goyal, N., & Dogra, A. (2025) · Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews · doi:10.2174/0115734056400866250923175325 · Cited by 3
Sattar, A., Bukhari, M., Rehman, Z. U., Khalid, S., Lee, Y., & Rho, S. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-34578-z · Cited by 3
Beyond vulnerabilities: A comprehensive survey of adversarial attacks across domains
Asimopoulos, D. C., Grammatikis, P. I. R., Papadopoulos, G. T., & Sarigiannidis, P. G. (2026) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2026.100963 · Cited by 3
MQTTFlowLyzer: interpretable TabNet-based flow-level MQTT intrusion detection for IoT
KouhiRonaghi, A., & Lashkari, A. H. (2026) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-026-08485-7 · Cited by 4
A CNN Deep Learning Technique for Botnet Attack Detection for IoT Application
Batham, Y., & Tiwari, P. R. K. (2023) · International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN) · doi:10.1109/icpcsn58827.2023.00199 · Cited by 3
IoT-based trusted wireless communication framework by machine learning approach
Chakaravarthi, S., Saravanan, S., Jagadeesh, M., & Nandhini, S. (2024) · Measurement Sensors · doi:10.1016/j.measen.2024.101271 · Cited by 3
Efficient IoT Malware Detection Technique Using Recurrent Neural Network
Abbas, M. A. A., & Khammas, B. M. (2024) · Iraqi Journal of Information & Communications Technology · doi:10.31987/ijict.7.3.249 · Cited by 3
FedGAD: Real-Time Anomaly Detection and Adaptive Defense With Federated GANs in 6G
Pan, Z., Ying, Z., Xiaomeng, J., Cai, J., & Zhou, W. (2025) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2025.3580103 · Cited by 3
Mondal, S., Ghosh, T., & Das, A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3603596 · Cited by 3
Cloud Security Analysis using Machine Learning Algorithms
Pavithra, B. S., Vinola, C., Mishra, N., & Naveen, G. (2023) · International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS) · doi:10.1109/icaiss58487.2023.10250594 · Cited by 3
A survey about deep learning and federated Learning in cyberse-curity
Tareq, I., Elbagoury, B. M., El-Regaily, S. A., & El-Horbaty, E.-S. M. (2024) · Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN) · doi:10.21533/pen.v12i1.3963 · Cited by 3
A Review of Artificial Intelligence′s Impact on Cybersecurity in the Big Data Era
Çakır, E., & Tolga, A. Ç. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-97576-9_12 · Cited by 2
Leveraging data analytics to revolutionize cybersecurity with machine learning and deep learning
Srinivasulu, A., Kim, T., Chinthaginjala, R., Zhao, X., & Ahmad, I. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-16932-3 · Cited by 2
A Next-Generation Cyber-Range Framework for O-RAN and 6G Security Validation
Chaskos, E., Kolokotronis, N., & Shiaeles, S. N. (2026) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi18010029 · Cited by 2
Şafak, I., Frantti, T., & Akgün, M. (2026) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08890-1_15 · Cited by 2
Hamza, A. A., Sakr, H. A., & Elashry, A. (2026) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-025-11758-6 · Cited by 2
Kale, D. R., Shirke-Deshmukh, S., Jadhav, A., Khatawkar, S. D., Mohite, S., Patil, P. D. S., Salunkhe, M. J., & Sonkamble, R. G. (2026) · Journal of Information Systems and Telecommunication (JIST) · doi:10.66224/jist.45751.13.52.333 · Cited by 2
Swarnalatha, T., Rao, S. L. A., Suryodai, R., Reddy, D. N., Vanathi, A., & Kumar, K. S. (2026) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-026-10129-6 · Cited by 2
Xue, Q., Xue, P., Wang, Z., & Ma, H. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15112409 · Cited by 2
Impact of Intelligent Technologies on IoV Security: Integrating Edge Computing and AI
Bilal, A., Sharif, K., Li, F., Bukhari, S., Zhu, L., Xu, C. L., & Biswas, S. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3816144 · Cited by 2
Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Conference
Bathen, L. A. D., Saldamlı, G., Sun, X., Austin, T. H., & Nelson, A. J. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24049-2 · Cited by 2
Shali, A., Chinnasamy, A., & Selvakumari, P. (2024) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.5018 · Cited by 2
A Systematic Literature Review of Multimodal Analysis Techniques for Malware Detection
Ibrahim, Z.-A., Ismail, S. A., & Rahim, F. A. (2024) · International Conference on Smart Sensors and Application (ICSSA) · doi:10.1109/icssa62312.2024.10788667 · Cited by 2
Enhancing Security Features in Wireless Sensor Networks using AI based Deep Learning Methods
Puzhakkalaveettil, M., & Praveena, M. (2024) · International Conference on Distributed Systems, Computer Networks and Cybersecurity (ICDSCNC) · doi:10.1109/icdscnc62492.2024.10939339 · Cited by 2
Deep Learning based IoT-Network Intrusion Detection and Classification Systems: A Survey
Chitty, A., & Sathyanarayana, B. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Trends and Pattern Recognition (ICAITPR) · doi:10.1109/icaitpr63242.2024.10959996 · Cited by 2
Federated learning for distributed intrusion detection in IoT networks
Du, Q., Li, B., Shao, Z., Wu, Y., & Yang, C. G. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-44-329032-9.00009-9 · Cited by 2
Research and Design of Encryption Standards Based on IoT Network Layer Information Security of Data
Wang, J. (2024) · ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems · doi:10.4108/eetsis.5826 · Cited by 2
Design of a Multimodal Network Data Security Detection Model Based on Self‐Supervised Learning
Lin, W. (2025) · Security and Privacy · doi:10.1002/spy2.70062 · Cited by 2
Data Sampling In Federated Learning: Principles, Features And Taxonomy
Mishra, A. K., & Puthal, D. (2023) · IEEE Communications Standards Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcomstd.0004.2200076 · Cited by 2
Distributed Learning for 6G–IoT Networks: A Comprehensive SurveyPreprint
Das, S. K., Mudi, R., Rahman, M. S., & Fapojuwo, A. O. (2022) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.20069051.v1 · Cited by 2
Distributed Learning for 6G–IoT Networks: A Comprehensive SurveyPreprint
Das, S. K., Mudi, R., Rahman, M. S., & Fapojuwo, A. O. (2022) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.20069051.v2 · Cited by 2
Distributed Learning for 6G–IoT Networks: A Comprehensive SurveyPreprint
Das, S. K., Mudi, R., Rahman, M. S., & Fapojuwo, A. O. (2022) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.20069051.v3 · Cited by 2
Optimized Lightweight Federated Learning for Botnet Detection in Smart Critical InfrastructurePreprint
Popoola, S. I., Ande, R., Atayero, A. A. A., Hammoudeh, M. A. A., Gui, G., & Adebisi, B. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23620674 · Cited by 2
Deep IoT Monitoring: Filtering IoT Traffic Using Deep Learning
Prabhugaonkar, G. G., Sun, X., Wang, X., & Dai, J. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24049-2_8 · Cited by 1
Murti, R. K. (2024) · Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis · doi:10.52783/cana.v31.803 · Cited by 1
Classification of Internet of Things Cybersecurity Attacks Using a Hybrid Deep Learning Approach
Kareem, E. K., & Manaa, M. E. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81065-7_12 · Cited by 1
Requirements for a Federated Learning System to Strengthen IT Security in Human Resource Management
Kolb, L., Rudel, S., & Lechner, U. (2025) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80122-8_1 · Cited by 1
Pradeep, K. R., Lakshmi, B. N., Rao, D. M. V., Divya, N. S., Vani, M. S., & K.Shailaja (2025) · International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · doi:10.22399/ijcesen.2394 · Cited by 1
Federated Learning in Cybersecurity: Enhancing Decentralized Threat Detection
Kurada, S. B. (2025) · IOSR Journal of Mobile Computing & Application · doi:10.9790/0050-12033339 · Cited by 1
Federated Learning-Driven Intrusion Detection for Cybersecurity in Smart Distribution system
Gupta, P., Sengupta, B., & Nandi, S. (2024) · IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) · doi:10.1109/gcwkshp64532.2024.11101136 · Cited by 1
A detailed comparative study on cybersecurity in IoT environment
Sangwan, U., & Chhillar, R. S. (2026) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-025-03124-5 · Cited by 1
Leveraging AI Techniques in Security Operation Centers for Enhanced Cyber Defense Model
Bolhan, Z. H., Hata, M. M., Allias, N., Shafiee, M. Z. A. B., Darus, M. Y., & Ninggal, M. I. H. (2025) · IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD) · doi:10.1109/scored68498.2025.11399115 · Cited by 1
Intelligent Security System for Big Data and IoT Ecosystems in Industry 6.0 Environments
Thavamani, S., Saravanan, A., Rajakumar, M., Kumar, D. S., Kumar, B. R., & Dhivya, B. (2025) · International Conference of Advances in Engineering and Computing Technologies for Sustainable Development (AECTSD) · doi:10.1109/aectsd65988.2025.11410845 · Cited by 1
Reis, M., Serôdio, C., & Branco, F. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15112469 · Cited by 1
Adi, P. W., Sugiharto, A., Adhy, S., Vianita, E., & Rahman, G. (2026) · Discover Internet of Things · doi:10.1007/s43926-026-00402-x · Cited by 1
Reis, M. J. C. S., Serôdio, C., & Branco, F. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15143069 · Cited by 1
Privacy Preservation using Federated Learning and Homomorphic Encryption: A Study
Ajay, D. M. (2022) · IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) · doi:10.1109/dasc/picom/cbdcom/cy55231.2022.9927802 · Cited by 1
A Systematic Literature Review of Cyber Security and Privacy in IoT Devices
Agustine, K., Tati, D. I., Andrea, V. A., Anggreainy, M. S., & Kurniawan, A. (2023) · International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE) · doi:10.1109/ic2ie60547.2023.10331333 · Cited by 1
Assessing the Suitability of IoT Security Datasets for IDS
Koppula, M., & Joseph, L. M. I. L. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2200-1.ch012 · Cited by 1
Alves, D. W. S., Dalmazo, B. L., Riker, A., Filho, G. P. R., & Immich, R. (2025) · doi:10.5753/sbcup.2025.9168 · Cited by 1
Han, H.-C., Huang, D., & Chen, C. (2025) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2025.070944 · Cited by 1
ML-Driven Adaptive Routing and Performance in Software-Defined Networks (SDN)
Senthilkumaran, N., & Sankarasubramaninan, D. R. (2025) · International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science · doi:10.51583/ijltemas.2025.1411000121 · Cited by 1
Thaw, M. P. P., Sarwatt, D. S., Ning, H., & Ding, J. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-026-11636-0 · Cited by 1
Deep Learning for Intrusion Detection in WoT
Laaychi, A., Tanana, M., Labiad, B., & Lyhyaoui, A. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35251-5_26 · Cited by 1
Priya, R., Hera, V., Prathela, T., & Subhiksha, R. (2023) · International Conference on System, Computation, Automation and Networking (ICSCAN) · doi:10.1109/icscan58655.2023.10394688 · Cited by 1
Rajesh, M., Vincent, R., Kathuria, S., Jamalpur, B., Durgam, T., & Jaiswal, T. (2023) · IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON) · doi:10.1109/upcon59197.2023.10434357 · Cited by 1
Sadu, V. B., Kumar, A., Al-Omari, O. M., Nallola, S. R., Sharma, R. K., & Khan, M. S. (2024) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1080/0954898x.2024.2336058 · Cited by 1
Maharddhika, I. N. P., & Chen, J.-L. (2024) · International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1109/cits61189.2024.10607992 · Cited by 1
Network Intrusion Detection Scheme Based on Federated Learning in Heterogeneous Network Environments
Zhu, Y., Li, C., & Wang, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/icccas62034.2024.10652649 · Cited by 1
Distributed Database Architectures for Federated Medical Training
Bandla, C. (2024) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology · doi:10.48175/ijarsct-22774 · Cited by 1
Mishra, M. K., Trivedi, L. M., Farooq, M., Nimma, D., Alazzam, M. B., & Bala, B. K. (2025) · AI-Driven Smart Healthcare for Society 5.0 · doi:10.1109/ieeeconf64992.2025.10963029 · Cited by 1
Hanumanthu, S., & Kumar, G. A. (2025) · International jounal of information technology and computer engineering. · doi:10.62647/ijitce2025v13i2pp1453-1461 · Cited by 1
WeightRelay: Efficient Heterogeneous Federated Learning on Time Series
Tang, W., & Long, G. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8388-9_11 · Cited by 1
Opportunities in Neural Networks for Industry 4.0
Monteiro, R. D. P., de Oliveira, J. P. G., Oliveira, S. C., & Bastos-Filho, C. J. A. (2024) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394216147.ch14 · Cited by 1
Machine learning-Enabled Network Traffic Analysis
Aouedi, O. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/98b92b52z17b2z43b7zb42ez26f74d2fff67 · Cited by 1
Distributed Learning for 6G–IoT Networks: A Comprehensive SurveyPreprint
Das, S. K., Mudi, R., Rahman, M. S., & Fapojuwo, A. O. (2022) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.20069051
Big data encrypting transmission framework for a multi-AGV system
Zhang, T., Wan, Y., López‐Benítez, M., Lim, E. G., Ma, F., & Yu, L. (2022) · International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC) · doi:10.1109/cyberc55534.2022.00019
An Explorative Analysis of IoT Security on Federated Intelligent Networks
Chempavathy, B., Sundaram, B. M., Reddy, S. B., Shibi, S. K., & Kotturi, S. (2022) · International Conference on Smart Generation Computing, Communication and Networking (SMART GENCON) · doi:10.1109/smartgencon56628.2022.10083746
An Experimental Analysis on Mitigating the Effects of Malicious Nodes in a Federated Learning System
Chempavathy, B., Shibi, S. K., Sundaram, B. M., Kotturi, S., & Reddy, S. B. (2023) · International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON) · doi:10.1109/inocon57975.2023.10101043
Anish, T. P., Amaran, S., Vathana, D., Sreekumar, K. P., & Mariammal, R. (2023) · International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS) · doi:10.1109/icaiss58487.2023.10250638
Wang, X., & Yu, Q. (2023) · International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication · doi:10.17762/ijritcc.v11i6.7739
Deep Learning's Impact on Advancing Cybersecurity in the Field of Computer Science
Poornima, D., Sheela, A. C. S., Ahamed, B. S., & Kathambari, P. (2023) · International Conference on Emerging Research in Computational Science (ICERCS) · doi:10.1109/icercs57948.2023.10434050
Sivalingam, V., Parveen, S., eena, R., & Panchalingam, J. (2024) · International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering · doi:10.14445/23488379/ijeee-v11i3p116
Robust Intrusion Detection for Industrial IoT
Ren, H., Gong, L., Mo, X., Yang, L., & Yin, Z. (2023) · International Conference on Mobility, Sensing and Networking (MSN) · doi:10.1109/msn60784.2023.00064
Application of Deep Learning in Public Network Security Management
Fan, L., Wang, H., Zhao, Y., & Xin, K. (2024) · Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research · doi:10.62051/jycc7c87
FL-ProtectX: Combating Label flipping in complex multi-agent environments
Zamani, M. A., Amiri, F., Jamshidi, P., Hosseini, S. M., & Yazdani, N. (2024) · International Symposium on Telecommunications · doi:10.1109/ist64061.2024.10843483
Federated Learning: Concepts, Application and Future Scope
Jain, P., & Patidar, S. (2025) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-5200-3_2
Hanumanthu, S., Kumar, G. A., Shaik, A., Jyothi, K. N., Günther, C., Haas, I., Holzwarth, F., Kramer, A., Kunz, L., Sator, N., et al. (2025) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74885-1_25
Majed, D. M., Abdulhameed, A. A., & Gaata, M. T. (2023) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Signal and Image Processing (AIRoSIP) · doi:10.1109/airosip58759.2023.10873947
Closing Thoughts, and Future Directions in Federated Cyber Intelligence
Tabrizchi, H., & Aghasi, A. (2025) · SpringerBriefs in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-86592-3_5
Salih, K. M. M., & Ibrahim, N. B. (2025) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0257114
A Hybrid Approach to Detect Botnet Attacks in IoT Environments using Machine Learning
Mohammedriyaz, Z., Shanmugapriya, N., Praveen, V., & Muthu Kumar, A. (2025) · International Conference on Computational Innovations and Engineering Sustainability (ICCIES) · doi:10.1109/iccies63851.2025.11032931
Kunwar, F. B. (2025) · Samvakti Journal of Research in Information Technology · doi:10.46402/sjrit.2024.9
AI-Driven Cyber Defence for India’s National Security
Shrivastav, A. (2025) · Electronic Journal of Social & Strategic Studies · doi:10.47362/ejsss.2025.6608
Blockchain for Collapse Risk Assessment of Undersea Rock Tunnel
Liu, S., Huang, H., Qu, L., & Sun, M. (2025) · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/ajrua6.rueng-1582
Machine Learning Approaches for Detecting Phishing Attacks in Cybersecurity
Kumar, A., Sripada, N. K., Shwetha, S., & Gupta, R. (2025) · International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) · doi:10.1109/incet64471.2025.11140801
Optimized Federated Ensemble Learning for Secure IoMT-Based Healthcare Monitoring System
Ghosh, T., Patra, S. S., & Mondal, S. (2025) · International Conference on Innovations in Intelligent Systems: Advancements in Computing, Communication, and Cybersecurity (ISAC3) · doi:10.1109/isac364032.2025.11156921
Soni, S., Binjola, R., & Mittal, K. (2025) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/9798898810030125040005
Machine Learning and AI Algorithms for Enhancing Cybersecurity in IoT Applications
Bafna, P., Gupta, P., Singh, J., Saipogu, L., Sen, N. K., & Hussien, R. R. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6906-6_19
Federated Learning in Image Processing for Clothes Recognition
Gupta, M., Budhraja, H., Bhardwaj, N., Agarwal, L., Singh, R., & Chaturvedi, R. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394167760.ch22
SplitFed Learning for Dementia Diagnosis: A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Distributed HealthcarePreprint
Kalbande, N., Patra, A. N., Shukla, R. M., & Faust, O. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7593311/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferrag, M. A., Friha, O., Maglaras, L., Janicke, H., & Shu, L.
- Affiliations
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Badji Mokhtar-Annaba University (DZ)
- De Montfort University (GB)
- Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ferrag, Mohamed Amine
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 138509-138542
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3203932036
- Semantic Scholar
- 82f305d3cb1a82fb6d4a5fcabb4fda40cb2b05e0
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 174
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Cyber Security Cooperative Research Centre (CSCRC) and Edith Cowan University, Australia
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- federated deep learning, Internet of Things security, IoT privacy, malware detection, intrusion detection, blockchain, Industrial Internet of Things, edge computing, Internet of Drones, Internet of Medical Things, Internet of Vehicles, Bot-IoT dataset, ToN-IoT, recurrent neural networks, convolutional neural networks, deep neural network
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
