Cited by 54Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTime Series Analysis and ForecastingGait Recognition and Analysis

HiHAR: A Hierarchical Hybrid Deep Learning Architecture for Wearable Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition

Open access
Hoai Thu, Nguyen Thi, Han, Dong Seog·2021·IEEE Access

Abstract

Wearable sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR) is the study that deals with sensor data to understand human movement and behavior. In a HAR model, feature extraction is widely considered to be the most essential and challenging part as the sensor signals contain important information in both spatial and temporal contexts. In addition, because people often carry out an activity for awhile before changing to another activity, the sensor data also contain long-term context dependencies. In this paper, in order to enhance the long, short-term and spatial features from the sensor data, we propose a hierarchical deep learning-based HAR model (HiHAR) which is constructed from two powerful deep neural network architectures: convolutional neural network (CNN) and bidirectional long short-term memory network (BiLSTM).With the hierarchical structure, HiHAR contains two stages: local and global. In the local stage, a CNN and a BiLSTM are applied on the window-data level to extract local spatiotemporal features. The global stage with another BiSLTM is used to extract long-term context information from adjacent windows in both forward and backward time directions, then performs activity classification task. Our experiment results on two public datasets (UCI HAPT and MobiAct scenario) indicate that the proposed hybrid model achieves competitive performance compared to other state-of-the-art HAR models with an average accuracy of 97.98% and 96.16%, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3122298

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Replacing LSTM with BiGRU and using an optimized attention mechanism reduces computational cost, making CNNd-TAm more efficient than Transformer-based [23] and hierarchical models [19].

    “Moreover, replacing LSTM with BiGRU and using an optimized attention mechanism reduces computational cost, making CNNd-TAm more efficient than Transformer-based [23] and hierarchical models [19], and suitable for deployment on resource-constrained wearable devices without compromising accuracy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoai Thu, N. T., & Han, D. S.
Affiliations
Kyungpook National University (KR)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
145271-145281
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3210561523
Cited by
54
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program (IITP-2021-2020-0-01808)
  • IITP
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
human activity recognition, wearable sensors, hierarchical deep learning, convolutional neural networks, bidirectional LSTM, spatiotemporal feature extraction, hybrid CNN-BiLSTM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review