Cited by 12COVID-19 diagnosis using AIDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Achieving Multisite Generalization for CNN-Based Disease Diagnosis Models by Mitigating Shortcut Learning

Open access
Ben Ahmed, Kaoutar, Hall, Lawrence O., Goldgof, Dmitry B., Fogarty, Ryan·2022·IEEE Access

Abstract

When a learned model has high accuracy under familiar settings (internal testing) and a big drop in accuracy under slightly different circumstances (external testing) we suspect it is using shortcuts to make decisions. This problem is known as shortcut learning. In medical imaging, shortcuts are undesired and unintended features that the model relies on to perform diagnosis. Shortcut-based solutions using medical images could lead to false diagnoses and have dangerous implications for patients. In the current COVID-19 era, a large set of papers have been published proposing the use of deep convolutional neural networks to perform diagnosis or triage of COVID-19 from chest X-rays (CXRs). These studies are reporting high accuracies which could be misleading and overestimated. To our knowledge, none of the currently published papers with high performance reported testing on samples from truly unseen data sources. Studies which did, have noticed a significant performance drop when testing on unseen sources indicating a failure to generalize. In this paper, we elucidate the generalization challenge of deep learning based models trained for disease diagnosis. We use the example of COVID-19 diagnosis from CXRs. Solutions that mitigate shortcut learning are introduced and experimentally shown to be effective. Our proposed methods enable the models to have a statistically significantly reduced performance drop-off on unseen data sources. Thus, lowering the performance drop to only 9% instead of 20%. The issues with convolutional neural networks addressed here generally apply to other imaging modalities and recognition problems, as shown.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2022.3193700

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben Ahmed, K., Hall, L. O., Goldgof, D. B., & Fogarty, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
  • University of South Florida (US)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2022
Volume
10
Pages
78726-78738
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4287889976
Cited by
12
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
shortcut learning, COVID-19 diagnosis, chest radiography, convolutional neural networks, external validation, medical image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review