An Investigation of Preprocessing Filters and Deep Learning Methods for Vessel Type Classification With Underwater Acoustic Data
Open accessAbstract
The illegal exploitation of protected marine environments has consistently threatened the biodiversity and economic development of coastal regions. Extensive monitoring in these – often remote – areas is challenging. Machine learning methods are useful in object detection and classification tasks and have the potential to underpin techniques for the development of robust monitoring systems to overcome this problem. However, development is hindered due to the limited number of publicly available labelled and curated datasets. Furthermore, there are relatively few open-source state-of-the-art methods to be used for evaluation. This paper presents an investigation of automated classification methods using underwater acoustic signals to infer the presence and type of vessels navigating in coastal regions. Various combinations of deep convolutional neural network architectures, and preprocessing filter layers, were evaluated using a new dataset based on a subset of the extensive open-source Ocean Networks Canada hydrophone data. Tests were conducted in which VGGNet and ResNet networks were applied to classify the input data. The data was preprocessed using either Constant Q Transform (CQT), Gammatone, Mel spectrogram, or a combination of these filters. With over 97% accuracy, using all three preprocessing representations simultaneously yielded the most reliable result. However, high accuracies of 94.95% were achieved using CQT as the preprocessing filter for a ResNet-based convolutional neural network, providing a trade-off between model complexity and accuracy; a result that is more than 10% higher than previously reported approaches. This more accurate classifier for underwater acoustics could be used as a reliable autonomous monitoring system in maritime environments.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper evaluates preprocessing filters and deep CNN architectures for classifying vessel types from underwater acoustic signals, using a new dataset derived from Ocean Networks Canada hydrophone data. ResNet18 with CQT preprocessing reached 94.95% accuracy, while combining CQT, Gammatone, and Mel spectrograms reached 97.07% accuracy.
Key findings
- ResNet18 with the Complete three-channel representation (CQT + Gammatone + Mel) achieved the best result: 97.07% accuracy, 94.57% precision, 97.61% recall, and 96.00% F1 on the first scenario.
- CQT alone with ResNet18 achieved 94.95% accuracy, 89.21% precision, 95.60% recall, and 91.92% F1, described as a trade-off between model complexity and accuracy and more than 10% higher than previously reported approaches.
- SGD outperformed Adam; the best SGD result was 84.46% accuracy with the Complete representation, 7 percentage points above the best Adam result of 77.39% with CQT.
- Version 2 CQT parameters improved accuracy by 9.13% (7.22 percentage points) over Version 1, from 79.10% to 86.32%.
- Across distance scenarios, CQT + ResNet achieved 94.95%, 94.45%, and 93.11% accuracy for the first, second, and third scenarios, but only 84.13% when all scenarios were combined.
Methods
- Data came from Ocean Networks Canada hydrophone recordings at the Strait of Georgia, Canada, from June 24 to November 3, 2017, using an icListen AF hydrophone at 147 m depth, with AIS data used to annotate four vessel classes: Tug, Passengership, Cargo, and Tanker, plus background.
- Audio was divided into 1-second segments; three distance-based scenarios were created using inclusion/exclusion radii; data was split 85% training, 10% validation, 5% test, with only the training subset balanced by oversampling.
- Preprocessing used Mel spectrogram, CQT, Gammatone, or a three-channel Complete representation; VGG-based and ResNet18 models were trained for 40 epochs with batch size 8 and categorical cross-entropy, comparing SGD and Adam optimizers and evaluating micro-average accuracy plus macro precision, recall, and F1.
Limitations
- The paper states that the combined-scenario results have “a large scope for improvement,” with accuracy varying by about 10 percentage points across scenarios, and that future work should consider other machine learning models and biologically inspired filters.
- The paper notes that automatic annotation could generate mislabelling, so a cleaning process was applied; it also states that the scenarios are not directly comparable because they do not contain the same number of instances or the same vessels.
- Evident from the text: the study uses one hydrophone location and time period, only four vessel classes plus background, and does not experimentally vary environmental conditions; class imbalance is addressed only in the training subset.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 50 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In the dataset, tagged vessel audio segments had higher amplitude variation (ρ) than background audio (μρ-vessel > μρ-back).
“As expected, this analysis showed that the tagged vessel data delivered higher variation (ϱ) when compared with the background audio (i.e., µ ϱ-vessel > µ ϱ-back ).”
- Also stated in: § III. DATASET · plain
“A data cleaning process was performed, noting that the variation of the time domain amplitude of a vessel was greater than that of the background sound.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § III. DATASET · plain
- Findingown data
The dataset had a class imbalance problem.
“As there was a class imbalance problem, only the Training subset was balanced using an oversampling strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using CQT as the preprocessing filter for a ResNet-based convolutional neural network achieved 94.95% accuracy.
“high accuracies of 94.95% were achieved using CQT as the preprocessing filter for a ResNet-based convolutional neural network”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Combining all of the data from the three scenarios caused an accuracy drop of between 8.98 and 10.82 percentage points compared to the individual scenarios alone.
“However, combining all of the data from the three scenarios caused an accuracy drop of between 8.98 and 10.82 percentage points compared to the individual scenarios alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both Gammatone and Mel Spectrogram methods presented lower accuracy values when compared with CQT and Complete representations.
“Both Gammatone and Mel Spectrogram methods presented lower accuracy values when compared with CQT and Complete representations, as shown in Table 6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given
The majority of the power in the underwater acoustic signal was predominantly focused on the low-frequency band, below 3 kHz.
“The majority of the power in the underwater acoustic signal was predominantly focused on the low-frequency band, below 3 kHz.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The worst CQT result, obtained with Version 1, was 17 percentage points better than the best result for Gammatone filter, obtained with Version 2.
“The worst CQT result, obtained with Version 1, was 17 percentage points better than the best result for Gammatone filter, obtained with Version 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The SGD approach was more stable during the training procedure.
“Also, the SGD approach was more stable during the training procedure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The best results obtained for SGD (using CQT) were 11.38 percentage points better than the performance (for the same preprocessing filters) obtained when using the Adam optimiser.
“The tests performed herein seem to corroborate this hypothesis, as the best results obtained for SGD (using CQT) were 11.38 percentage points better than the performance (for the same preprocessing filters) obtained when using the Adam optimiser.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Results with the Combined scenario show a higher confusion rate between background and tug than when the scenarios were trained separately.
“In particular, results with the Combined scenario show a higher confusion rate between background and tug than when the scenarios were trained separately.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adam performed marginally better than SGD in the test where the Gammatone filter was used as the preprocessing method.
“Adam performed marginally better than SGD in the test where the Gammatone filter was used as the preprocessing method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When using the CQT method, Version 2 had an accuracy improvement of 9.13% (7.22 percentage points) over Version 1.
“On the other hand, when using the CQT method, Version 2 had an accuracy improvement of 9.13% (7.22 percentage points) over Version 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The maximum frequency experimentally observed in the underwater acoustic signal was 3 kHz.
“the frequency of 4186 Hz (C8 note and ≈ 1 kHz above the 3 kHz experimentally observed maximum value)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The loss curves for CQT and Complete preprocessing methods feeding a ResNet18 classifier are almost identical.
“Figure 8 also shows that the loss curves for CQT and Complete preprocessing methods (feeding a ResNet18 classifier) are almost identical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The largest (by far) point of confusion in the Combined dataset was the classifier detecting the presence of a tug when there was no vessel present.
“It should be noted that the largest (by far) point of confusion in the Combined dataset was the classifier detecting the presence of a tug when there was no vessel present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Even in the cases where the Complete representation showed the best results (ResNet model), its performance was similar to that obtained using only the CQT spectrograms as input.
“Even in the cases where the Complete representation showed the best results (ResNet model), its performance was similar to that obtained using only the CQT spectrograms as input.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The loss curves for CQT and Complete when applied to a VGG-based model show a better performance for CQT than Complete.
“This contrasts with the curves shown in Figure 7 that represents a better performance for the CQT than Complete when applied to a VGG-based model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The ResNet approach outperformed the VGG-based model for both CQT and Complete data representation methods by at least 8.09 percentage points in accuracy.
“With respect to the DL model selection, the ResNet approach outperformed the VGG-based model for both CQT and Complete data representation methods by at least 8.09 percentage points in accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The tests using the combination of the data points from all three scenarios presented the worst results compared with the performance values obtained for each of its constituent scenarios.
“The tests using the combination of the data points from all three scenarios presented the worst results compared with the performance values obtained for each of its constituent scenarios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Even using the Version 1 Mel Spectrogram results show an accuracy value that was 25 percentage points below that of CQT for the same parameters, representing a 31.15% drop in accuracy.
“However, even using the Version 1 Mel Spectrogram results show an accuracy value that was 25 percentage points below that of CQT for the same parameters, representing a 31.15% drop in accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A new dataset was defined using raw data from Ocean Networks Canada, including underwater acoustic signals annotated with related vessel types.
“A new dataset was defined, using the raw data from Ocean Networks Canada 3 , which include the underwater acoustic signals annotated with the related vessel types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The vessel type annotations in the ONC dataset are correct.
- Findingnone given
The accuracy across distinct scenarios had a variation of 10 percentage points.
“the accuracy across distinct scenarios had a variation of 10 percentage points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The vessel type annotations in the ONC dataset are correct.
- Rests on an assumption: The distances between target vessels and the hydrophone are accurately known for defining the three scenarios.
- Findingown data
An accuracy of 97% was achieved when all three preprocessing methods (CQT, Gammatone, and Mel Spectrogram) were used simultaneously.
“Higher accuracy (97%) was achieved if all three preprocessing methods (CQT, Gammatone, and Mel Spectrogram) were used simultaneously.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The vessel type annotations in the ONC dataset are correct.
- Rests on an assumption: The distances between target vessels and the hydrophone are accurately known for defining the three scenarios.
- Findingown data
The CQT and the Combined preprocessing approaches achieved the highest accuracy results for the dataset used in this paper.
“The results showed that the CQT and the Combined approaches achieved the highest accuracy results for the dataset used in this paper.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The vessel type annotations in the ONC dataset are correct.
- Findingown data
The present work achieved a classification accuracy of 84.13% for the Combined dataset (all three distance scenarios combined) using CQT preprocessing.
“the results reported in that paper are similar to those obtained in the present work for the Combined dataset (84%).”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“Furthermore, a test was conducted combining the three distance scenarios into a single dataset, resulting in a classification accuracy of 84.13% for the CQT preprocessed data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The vessel type annotations in the ONC dataset are correct.
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
- Findingown data
ResNet18 yielded the highest evaluation metrics when compared to the VGGNet model.
“Concerning the deep learning model, results showed that ResNet18 yielded the highest evaluation metrics when compared to the VGGNet model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The vessel type annotations in the ONC dataset are correct.
- Premisecitation
For sound classification, the logarithm representation of frequency is preferred over the linear representation, following the analogy with the human auditory system.
“For the problem of sound classification, the logarithm representation of the frequency is preferred over the linear representation, following the analogy with the human auditory system [46].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The 94.95% accuracy result with CQT and ResNet provides a trade-off between model complexity and accuracy.
“providing a trade-off between model complexity and accuracy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The low SNR and high variability of underwater acoustic signals raise the difficulty of the recognition task.
“raising the difficulty of the recognition task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Underwater acoustic signals are a mixture of environmental, biological, and human-generated sounds.
- Interpretationown data
The 94.95% accuracy result is more than 10% higher than previously reported approaches.
“a result that is more than 10% higher than previously reported approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Individual segments tagged to contain a vessel but with a ρ value less than the overall standard deviation of the background increased by the mean (μρ-back + σρ-back) were removed from the collection as they represented potentially mislabelled signals.
“Individual segments tagged to contain a vessel, but with a ϱ value that was less than the overall standard deviation of the background increased by the mean (µ ϱ-back +σ ϱ-back ), were removed from the collection as they represented potentially mislabelled signals in the dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Segments tagged to contain a vessel but with a ϱ value less than µ_back + σ_back represent potentially mislabelled signals.
- Premisecitation
The Constant Q Transform (CQT) provides the means to solve the problem of fundamental frequency identification.
“This improves the resolution between frequencies of interest, while providing the means to solve the problem of fundamental frequency identification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
A fair trade off between accuracy and model size is obtained when using the CQT as a single preprocessing method.
“This result suggests that a fair trade off between accuracy and model size is obtained when using the CQT as a single preprocessing method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There is no practical difference in accuracy between the individual scenarios.
“However, these results suggest that there is no practical difference in accuracy between the individual scenarios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The superior performance of ResNet was likely due to the existence of residual blocks in the ResNet model, which reduce the probability of overfitting.
“This superior performance was likely due to the existence of residual blocks in the ResNet model, which reduce the probability of overfitting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Range to target had minimal impact on system accuracy, at least up to the tested 6 km distance boundary.
“This means that range to target had minimal impact on system accuracy, at least up to the tested 6 km distance boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Complete representation's generation and processing is more computationally expensive than applying each preprocessing method individually.
“As the Complete representation combines multiple preprocessing methods, its generation and processing is more computationally expensive than applying each preprocessing method individually.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The improvement in CQT Version 2 was likely due to the parameter optimisation process, which led to an increase in the temporal scale with the shorter hop length, and an improvement of the frequency representation with optimised frequency boundaries.
“This improvement was likely due to the parameter optimisation process, which led to an increase in the temporal scale with the shorter hop length, and an improvement of the frequency representation with optimised frequency boundaries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The Constant Q Transform (CQT) improves the resolution between frequencies of interest.
“This improves the resolution between frequencies of interest, while providing the means to solve the problem of fundamental frequency identification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Adaptive optimisation methods, like Adam, often generalise significantly worse than stochastic methods, such as SGD, since the strategy used by the former to escape saddle points causes difficulties in achieving flat global minima.
“This agrees with other studies (e.g., [56], [57]) that argue adaptive optimisation methods, like Adam, often generalise significantly worse than stochastic methods, such as SGD, since the strategy used by the former to escape saddle points causes difficulties in achieving flat global minima.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [56]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Adam's performance was not satisfactory in this domain, owing to lower accuracy rates as a result of its inefficient treatment of local minima.
“The results reported in Section VI-A showed that Adam's performance was not satisfactory in this domain, owing to lower accuracy rates as a result of its inefficient treatment of local minima.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The higher confusion between background and tug in the Combined scenario was probably due to the similar range of frequencies from these two classes, that may have been enhanced due to the combination of SNR from the various scenarios.
“This was probably due to the similar range of frequencies from these two classes, that may have been enhanced due to the combination of SNR from the various scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
There is a negative influence in the data from the different scenarios that confused the model during training.
“This suggests there is a negative influence in the data from the different scenarios that confused the model during training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The VGG model, using Version 2 of the preprocessing parameters, outperformed the results obtained with Version 1.
“These results suggest that the VGGmodel, using Version 2 of the preprocessing parameters, outperformed the results obtained with Version 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The baseline results obtained in the present work are within the state-of-the-art of the field.
“This already places the baseline results obtained in the present work within the state-of-the-art of the field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DeepShip dataset results reported in [41] are comparable to the present work's results despite differences in data collection and conditions.
- Interpretationcitation
The results reported in [41] are similar to those obtained in the present work for the Combined dataset (84%).
“Although it is virtually impossible to faithfully reproduce the results reported in [41] (as the code used to generate them is not publicly available) it is possible to observe that the results reported in that paper are similar to those obtained in the present work for the Combined dataset (84%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The DeepShip dataset results reported in [41] are comparable to the present work's results despite differences in data collection and conditions.
- May combine two claims. 38
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing all three preprocessing representations simultaneously (CQT, Gammatone, and Mel spectrogram) yielded the most reliable result, with over 97% accuracy.
“With over 97% accuracy, using all three preprocessing representations simultaneously yielded the most reliable result.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe classification accuracy obtained using the three-channel Complete representation was marginally better than the best single filter (CQT) for ResNet, but not the VGG model.
“The results obtained showed that the classification accuracy obtained using this three-channel representation was marginally better than the best single filter (CQT) for ResNet, but not the VGG model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA minor degradation in accuracy was observed with respect to an increase in the distance to the sensor, but the results obtained for the three scenarios showed similar figures.
“Despite the fact that a minor degradation in accuracy was observed with respect to an increase in the distance to the sensor, the results obtained for the three scenarios showed similar figures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningCombining CQT, Gammatone, and Mel spectra resulted in data samples with dimensions of 64x63x3 for Version 1 and 95x128x3 for Version 2.
“Combining CQT, Gammatone, and Mel spectra resulted in data samples with dimensions of 64x63x3 for Version 1 and 95x128x3 for Version 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe ResNet18 model outperformed VGG for both CQT and Complete preprocessing filters, presenting an improvement of 8.09 percentage points for the CQT, and 14.15 for the Complete.
“The results showed that the ResNet18 model outperformed VGG for both CQT and Complete preprocessing filters, presenting an improvement of 8.09 percentage points for the CQT, and 14.15 for the Complete, the latter being the best result obtained for this dataset scenario overall.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSGD outperformed Adam for CQT, Mel, and the Complete representation, with Complete having the highest values.
“The results represented in Table 5 show that SGD outperformed Adam for CQT, Mel, and the Complete representation, where the latter had the highest values (as shown in bold font in Table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSGD produced higher accuracy and a more stable performance.
“In comparison, SGD produced higher accuracy and a more stable performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe training session using Adam and the Mel spectrogram did not converge to a global minimum, as the model predicted that almost everything belonged to the same class.
“In addition, the training session using Adam and the Mel spectrogram did not converge to a global minimum as the model predicted that almost everything belonged to the same class, as per the class-normalised confusion matrix shown in Figure 6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDespite the accuracy drop of 1.54 percentage points between Version 1 and Version 2 for the Complete scenario, the precision improved 1.58 percentage points.
“Additionally, despite the accuracy drop of 1.54 percentage points between Version 1 and Version 2 for the Complete scenario, the precision improved 1.58 percentage points, showing a very close result for both versions of the Complete representation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe higher accuracy comparing best results for SGD and Adam with CQT and Complete inputs was obtained with the SGD optimiser (84.46%), which is 7 percentage points larger than the best result obtained with Adam (77.39%).
“Comparing the best results for SGD and Adam, with CQT and Complete inputs, the higher accuracy was obtained with the SGD optimiser (84.46%), which is 7 percentage points larger accuracy than the best result obtained with Adam (77.39%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe Complete representation combined with the ResNet model presented an improvement of 2.12 percentage points in accuracy over CQT, but CQT was able to obtain a similar value using only one-third of the input size and preprocessing.
“Although the Complete representation, combined with the ResNet model, presented an improvement of 2.12 percentage points in accuracy, the CQT was able to obtain a similar value using only one-third of the input size and preprocessing, since Complete is a three-channel representation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn our dataset, the CQT representation presented better performance, with an accuracy of around 86%, when compared with Gammatone and Mel spectrograms, with best accuracies of 62% and 54%, respectively, a minimum of 24 percentage points improvement.
“In our dataset, the CQT representation presented better performance, with an accuracy of around 86%, when compared with Gammatone and Mel spectrograms, with best accuracies of 62% and 54%, respectively, a minimum of 24 percentage points improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThree distinct scenarios were defined with respect to the distance between the target vessel and the hydrophone used to capture the signal.
“Three distinct scenarios were defined with respect to the distance between the target vessel to the hydrophone used to capture the signal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The distances between target vessels and the hydrophone are accurately known for defining the three scenarios.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe three distance scenarios were compared using the proposed pipeline, achieving a maximum accuracy of 94.95% when CQT was used to preprocess the data fed into a ResNet classification model.
“These three scenarios were compared using the proposed pipeline, achieving a maximum accuracy of 94.95% when CQT was used to preprocess the data fed into a ResNet classification model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The vessel type annotations in the ONC dataset are correct.
- Rests on an assumption: The distances between target vessels and the hydrophone are accurately known for defining the three scenarios.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor distinct distance scenarios, the present work achieved an accuracy of 95% with CQT preprocessing or 97% with Complete (combined) preprocessing.
“However, the research reported here achieved superior results when distinct scenarios were considered with respect to the distance to the sensor, obtaining an accuracy of 95% or 97% depending on the preprocessing filtering method used (CQT or Complete, respectively), as shown in Table 9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The vessel type annotations in the ONC dataset are correct.
- Rests on an assumption: The distances between target vessels and the hydrophone are accurately known for defining the three scenarios.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenA complete pipeline for the classification of underwater acoustic signals was proposed in this paper.
“A complete pipeline for the classification of underwater acoustic signals was proposed in this paper, whose source code and data will be made publicly available 4 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe SGD optimiser is more stable and presents better generalisation than Adam for the vessel type classification problem.
“This study also compared the SGD and Adam optimiser performance applied to the vessel type classification problem, showing that the SGD optimiser is more stable and presents a better generalisation than Adam.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCombining multiple preprocessing filters as inputs to CNN models achieves superior outcomes compared to individual approaches.
“The comparison of the results obtained with individual approaches and their combination showed that superior outcomes could be achieved with the latter.”
- Also stated in: § II. RELATED WORK · plain
“Another relevant work used a fusion of the Mel-spectrogram, MFCC, chromatogram, spectral contrast, and Tonnetz filters, resulting in a one-dimensional representation, to improve the performance of a CNN model for the classification of underwater acoustic signals [43].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [42]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § II. RELATED WORK · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe results were further analysed and filtered to avoid mislabelling from the automatic annotation procedure.
“This automatic annotation procedure could generate mislabelling in the dataset, therefore the results were further analysed and filtered to avoid this issue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The automatic annotation procedure could generate mislabelling in the dataset.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEnvironmental conditions such as temperature, depth, salinity, pressure, and precipitation can directly influence how the signal travels from emitter to receiver.
“Environmental conditions, such as temperature, depth, salinity, pressure, and even precipitation, can directly influence how the signal travels from emitter to receiver [28].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent state-of-the-art methods for underwater acoustic signal analysis and classification are largely based on deep-learning algorithms.
“However, recent state-of-the-art methods are largely based on the application of deep-learning algorithms to solve similar tasks [17]- [19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]- [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnderwater acoustic signals have a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and a high degree of variability for the same source.
“it has a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and a high degree of variability for the same source [15], [16]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: Underwater acoustic signals are a mixture of environmental, biological, and human-generated sounds.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe task of underwater acoustic target classification is challenging due to the complex nature of the sound produced by vessels.
“The task of underwater acoustic target classification is challenging due to the complex nature of the sound produced by vessels [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: Different types of vessels, in diverse states of upkeep, produce fundamentally distinct sounds depending on the vessel's speed, the state of its mechanical parts, and the hydrodynamics of its design.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationSmaller CNN models can have a beneficial trade-off between processing time and accuracy.
“This proved that smaller models can have a beneficial trade-off between processing time and accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClassical signal processing methods such as Cepstral analysis can improve the quality of processed sound by reducing reflections interference and scattering losses, but only for short ranges with high SNR.
“some classical signal processing methods, such as Cepstral analysis [14], can improve the quality of the processed sound by reducing the effects of the reflections interference and scattering losses, but only if applied on signals for short ranges with a high SNR [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe acoustic signals emitted by vessels captured using hydrophones provide a low-cost and fraud-resistant data source for surveillance tasks, because acoustic signals can be difficult to omit or mask.
“the acoustic signals emitted by vessels captured using hydrophones provide a low-cost and fraud-resistant data source to be used in surveillance tasks, as acoustic signals can be difficult to omit or mask.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuperior results, smaller networks, and reduced training time are obtained with the use of appropriate preprocessing filters in the classification pipeline.
“Therefore, superior results, in addition to smaller networks and reduced training time, are obtained with the use of appropriate preprocessing filters in the classification pipeline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdditional complexity exists due to background sound produced by the region and the complexity of sound propagation in shallow waters, which causes multi-path reflections.
“additional complexity exists due to the background sound produced by the region and the complexity of sound propagation in shallow waters, which causes multi-path reflections [27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing preprocessing filters in underwater audio tasks yields better results than applying a CNN directly to raw audio or than baseline approaches.
“Similarly, Mel-log spectrograms, delta, and delta-delta features were also used as acoustic filters in a ship detection task using a CNN, where high accuracy in the detection and localisation of vessels was reported [37].”
- Also stated in: § II. RELATED WORK · boosted
“Other studies in the literature also successfully applied filters to the DL inputs, showing a consistent improvement in underwater audio classification tasks [38]- [41].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [38]- [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § II. RELATED WORK · boosted
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe most recent studies have used VGGNet or ResNet models as base algorithms for this development, owing to the models' high accuracy in complex classification tasks.
“The most recent studies have used VGGNet [23] or ResNet [24] models as base algorithms for this development, owing to the models' high accuracy in complex classification tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough CNNs can be applied directly to the audio signal, acoustic filters are frequently used as preprocessing layers to improve the quality of the resulting audio representations.
“Although CNNs can be applied directly to the audio signal [31], [34], [35], acoustic filters are frequently used as preprocessing layers to improve the quality of the resulting audio representations [25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCNNs are now being considered for underwater acoustic classification applications.
“Advances in machine learning techniques mean CNNs are now being considered for underwater acoustic classification applications [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIsolating data to scenarios where only a single vessel was within the inclusion zone and no other vessels were within the exclusion zone ensured a more reliable acoustic signature without interference from other vessels.
“Data was isolated where only a single vessel was within the inclusion zone while no other vessels were within the exclusion zone.This ensured a more reliable acoustic signature without interference from other vessels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis more accurate classifier for underwater acoustics could be used as a reliable autonomous monitoring system in maritime environments.
“This more accurate classifier for underwater acoustics could be used as a reliable autonomous monitoring system in maritime environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There is a need for an autonomous monitoring system that can generate an alert whenever a particular class of vessel is detected in an area, in order to better monitor and protect marine environments.
- Rests on an assumption: Machine learning methods are useful in object detection and classification tasks and have the potential to underpin techniques for the development of robust monitoring systems to overcome the problem of illegal exploitation of protected marine environments.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThere is a pertinent need for a complete investigation into the application of DL algorithms for underwater acoustic classification that considers optimisation of DL model parameters and comparison between different preprocessing filters.
“However, there is a pertinent need for a complete investigation into the application of DL algorithms for the task, an investigation that considers the optimisation of the DL model parameters, and the comparison between different preprocessing filters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMel's scale is empirically based on the way humans perceive sound.
“Mel's scale is empirically based on the way humans perceive sound [47].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningBecause the sound generated by sources in the underwater domain is dependent on the environment, it is important that the type of two-dimensional representation matches the problem and that its parameters are optimised for the task.
“as the sound generated by sources in the underwater domain is dependent on the environment, it is of extreme importance that not only the type of two-dimensional representation matches the problem, but also its parameters must be optimised for the task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent studies, mostly based on Deep Learning methods, have shown promise in automatic data classification tasks.
“recent studies, mostly based on the application of Deep Learning (DL) methods [17]- [19], have shown promise in automatic data classification tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]- [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe engine typically produces a broadband continuous spectrum, while the propeller generates narrow band components with power at discrete frequencies.
“The former typically produces a broadband continuous spectrum, while the latter generates narrow band components whose spectrum consists of power at discrete frequencies [26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThe rationale behind using stacks of multiple filters is to take advantage of the strengths of each method by feeding the network with different representations of the sound.
“The rationale behind this approach is to take advantage of the strengths of each method, feeding the network with different representations of the sound.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeeper CNN models achieved less than 1% accuracy improvement over shallow models for mine-like object detection from sidescan sonar images, at the cost of a 17x increase in computational requirements.
“The comparative results reported suggest that deeper models (i.e., models with multiple layers) achieved less than 1% of accuracy improvement when compared with shallow models, at the cost of a 17x increase of computational requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe gammatone filter was first defined as a filter bank capable of representing the shape of the impulse response function of the human auditory system.
“The gammatone filter was first defined as a filter bank capable of representing the shape of the impulse response function of the human auditory system [51].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSGD is an iterative method that starts randomly and seeks the minimum value in the input function.
“SGD is an iterative method that starts randomly and seeks the minimum value in the input function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe gammatone representation has an amplitude characteristic that can be used to predict the human auditory response.
“This representation has an amplitude characteristic that can be used to predict the human auditory response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn accuracy value of around 87% was reported for a bio-inspired cochlea model preprocessing filter applied to a CNN-based classification.
“An accuracy value of around 87% was reported as a result of the application of a bio-inspired cochlea model preprocessing filter to a CNN-based classification [40].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe function defined in Equation (8) was used by [51] to summarise the RevCor, a representation of the correlation between a sound stimulus on the human ear and the response of a primary auditory fibre.
“The function defined on Equation ( 8) was used by [51] to summarise the RevCor, a representation of the correlation between a sound stimulus on the human ear and the response of a primary auditory fibre [52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [52]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe acoustic signals generated by the vessels are predominantly composed of lower frequencies.
“One is that the acoustic signals generated by the vessels are predominantly composed of lower frequencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough ResNet18 produced the best classification results, VGG-based classifiers are still suitable models to be used in applications with limited computational resources.
“Considering the relative complexity and accuracy results of both models tested in this work, we can conclude that, although ResNet18 produced the best classification results, VGG-based classifiers are still suitable models to be used in applications with limited computational resources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe depth and ocean temperature where the hydrophone was located provided the best context for underwater sound propagation, thereby not degrading the SNR sufficiently to invalidate the signal representation.
“One explanation for this could be the depth and ocean temperature where the hydrophone was located, which provided the best context for underwater sound propagation [25], thereby not degrading the SNR sufficiently to invalidate the signal representation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResNet addresses the vanishing gradient and accuracy degradation issues by introducing the identity shortcut connection, bypassing one or more layers in a forward pass, defining Residual Blocks.
“ResNet addresses these issues by introducing the identity shortcut connection, bypassing one or more layers in a forward pass, defining Residual Blocks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe different scenarios do not contain the same number of instances (or the same vessels), so they are not directly comparable.
“As the different scenarios do not contain the same number of instances (or the same vessels), they are not directly comparable, making it difficult to precisely state which situation allowed the best outputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe worst results in the combined dataset were probably due to the fact that, although a minor variation in the SNR did not affect the results obtained in each of the individual scenarios, this difference was large enough to increase the complexity of the audio patterns contained in the combined dataset, thus hindering the capacity of a simple classifier to find a suitable generalisation that, in,
“This was probably due to the fact that, although a minor variation in the SNR (resulted from the distance between target and sensor) did not affect the results obtained in each of the individual scenarios, this difference was large enough to increase the complexity of the audio patterns contained in the combined dataset, thus hindering the capacity of a simple classifier to find a suitable general”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior work using ONC data reported accuracy values of the order of 80% using raw audio data, where time-frequency filter dependency was not considered in deep learning pipelines.
“Considering related work developed with data from the ONC initiative, accuracy values of the order of 80% were previously reported using raw audio data, where time-frequency filter dependency was not considered in DL pipelines [34], [35].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe gammatone representation has a minimum-phase characteristic, which is a preferred feature for an auditory filter bank.
“It also has a minimum-phase characteristic, which is a preferred feature for an auditory filter bank [52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMel Spectrograms are commonly used in speech recognition analysis and music processing, where human perception is extremely relevant.
“Mel Spectrograms are commonly used in speech recognition analysis and music processing, where human perception is extremely relevant [49].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCorrect tuning of the quality factor Q can supply the needed information for acoustic analysis, with resolution to distinguish adjacent musical notes, where a sound with harmonic frequency components will produce a constant pattern in the log frequency domain.
“The correct tuning of the quality factor Q can supply the needed information for the acoustic analysis, with resolution to distinguish adjacent musical notes, where a sound with harmonic frequency components will produce a constant pattern in the log frequency domain [50].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAdam is an extension of SGD based on the combination of the Adaptive Gradient Algorithm (AdaGrad) and the Root Mean Square Propagation (RMSP).
“Adam, on the other hand, is an extension of SGD based on the combination of the Adaptive Gradient Algorithm (AdaGrad) and the Root Mean Square Propagation (RMSP).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCQT increases the time resolution towards higher frequencies while reducing the frequency resolution; this results in emphasising the lower-frequencies, which is akin to the human aural perception.
“In contrast, CQT increases the time resolution towards higher frequencies while reducing the frequency resolution; this results in emphasising the lower-frequencies, which is akin to the human aural perception [50].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe ResNet's capacity to have more intermediate layers proved to be suitable for the feature extraction stage, as it gave the model the ability to generalise the problem function better, thus resulting in higher classification performance.
“The ResNet's capacity to have more intermediate layers proved to be suitable for the feature extraction stage, as it gave the model the ability to generalise the problem function better, thus resulting in higher classification performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResidual blocks facilitate the learning ability of the intermediary layers, reducing the vanishing gradient problem, and penalising the ones that could potentially degrade accuracy.
“These blocks facilitate the learning ability of the intermediary layers, reducing the vanishing gradient problem, and penalising the ones that could potentially degrade accuracy [24].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe momentum-based strategy of SGD provides a drift effect to escape saddle points without affecting the flat minima selection.
“In contrast, the momentum-based strategy of the latter provides a drift effect to escape saddle points without affecting the flat minima selection [57].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Gammatone filter does not emphasise low frequencies sufficiently, resulting in a lower classification performance.
“However, the Gammatone filter does not emphasise low frequencies sufficiently, resulting in a lower classification performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe work in [41] used a dataset called DeepShip, whose recordings were divided into 613 files varying from about 6 seconds to 1530 seconds.
“That work was developed on a dataset called DeepShip, whose recordings were divided into 613 files, which varies from about 6 seconds to 1530 seconds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the DeepShip dataset, only the identification of a single vessel within a range of 2 km from the hydrophone was used to generate the data, and background noise recordings were added from a distinct source.
“Only the identification of a single vessel within a range of 2 km from the hydrophone was used to generate the data, and the background noise recordings were added from a distinct source.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA comparison of various deep learning methods was conducted in [41] using an analogous set of ONC raw data that was used in the present paper.
“In addition, a comparison of various deep learning methods was conducted in [41] using an analogous set of ONC raw data that was used in the present paper.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe highest accuracy obtained in [41] was 77.53%.
“However, it was reported that 77.53% was the highest accuracy obtained in that work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a need for an autonomous monitoring system that can generate an alert whenever a particular class of vessel is detected in an area, in order to better monitor and protect marine environments.
“In order to better monitor and protect marine environments, there is a need for an autonomous monitoring system that can generate an alert whenever a particular class of vessel is detected in an area.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Machine learning methods are useful in object detection and classification tasks and have the potential to underpin techniques for the development of robust monitoring systems to overcome the problem of illegal exploitation of protected marine environments.
“Machine learning methods are useful in object detection and classification tasks and have the potential to underpin techniques for the development of robust monitoring systems to overcome this problem.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Development of monitoring systems is hindered due to the limited number of publicly available labelled and curated datasets.
“However, development is hindered due to the limited number of publicly available labelled and curated datasets.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are relatively few open-source state-of-the-art methods to be used for evaluation.
“Furthermore, there are relatively few open-source state-of-the-art methods to be used for evaluation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Underwater acoustic signals are a mixture of environmental, biological, and human-generated sounds.
“the underwater acoustic signal is a mixture of environmental, biological, and human-generated sounds.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Different types of vessels, in diverse states of upkeep, produce fundamentally distinct sounds depending on the vessel's speed, the state of its mechanical parts, and the hydrodynamics of its design.
“As there are different types of vessels, in diverse states of upkeep, the sound produced by them is fundamentally distinct from one another, depending on the vessel's speed, the state of its mechanical parts, and the hydrodynamics of its design.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The impact of environmental variables on vessel classification is virtually non-existent in the related literature.
“Additionally, the impact of environmental variables on vessel classification is virtually non-existent in the related literature.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Vessel classification using machine learning depends on the quality of the input data.
“As the problem of vessel classification using machine learning depends on the quality of the input data, it was expected that the sound emitted by distant sources would have a lower SNR and, thus, lower classification accuracy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sound emitted by distant sources would have a lower SNR and thus lower classification accuracy.
“As the problem of vessel classification using machine learning depends on the quality of the input data, it was expected that the sound emitted by distant sources would have a lower SNR and, thus, lower classification accuracy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The CQT representation increases time resolution towards higher frequencies, resembling the human auditory system, while emphasising lower frequencies.
“This representation also increases time resolution towards higher frequencies, resembling the human auditory system, while emphasising lower frequencies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The automatic annotation procedure could generate mislabelling in the dataset.
“This automatic annotation procedure could generate mislabelling in the dataset, therefore the results were further analysed and filtered to avoid this issue.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Segments tagged to contain a vessel but with a ϱ value less than µ_back + σ_back represent potentially mislabelled signals.
“Individual segments tagged to contain a vessel, but with a ϱ value that was less than the overall standard deviation of the background increased by the mean (µ ϱ-back +σ ϱ-back ), were removed from the collection as they represented potentially mislabelled signals in the dataset.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Combining CQT, Gammatone, and Mel spectra into a three-channel representation provides the neural network with more complete representations and takes advantage of the strengths of each preprocessing method.
“This was motivated by providing the Neural Network with more complete representations, aiming to take advantage of the strengths of each of the preprocessing methods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
VGG-based methods can perceive granular spatial relations on images due to their use of a 3x3 kernel size, the smallest possible size to capture the four cardinal directions.
“VGG-based methods can perceive granular spatial relations on images due their use of a 3x3 kernel size, the smallest possible size to capture the four cardinal directions (up, down, left, and right).”
The paper relies on this without support.
SGD is the most common optimiser used in the literature.
“It is the most common optimiser used in the literature.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The performances of optimisers are domain dependent.
“However, their performances are domain dependent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Gammatone filter-banks facilitate the representation of the signal's time domain response, as gamma filters are broader on lower frequencies and narrow on higher ones, emphasising the lower spectrum.
“Gammatone filter-banks facilitate the representation of the signal's time domain response, as gamma filters are broader on lower frequencies and narrow on higher ones, emphasising the lower spectrum.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The vanishing gradient and accuracy degradation problems become problematic as more layers are added to neural network models.
“although the vanishing gradient and the accuracy degradation problems become problematic as more layers are added to the models.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The vessel type annotations in the ONC dataset are correct.
“A new dataset was defined, using the raw data from Ocean Networks Canada 3 , which include the underwater acoustic signals annotated with the related vessel types.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The distances between target vessels and the hydrophone are accurately known for defining the three scenarios.
“Three distinct scenarios were defined with respect to the distance between the target vessel to the hydrophone used to capture the signal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The DeepShip dataset results reported in [41] are comparable to the present work's results despite differences in data collection and conditions.
“In addition, a comparison of various deep learning methods was conducted in [41] using an analogous set of ONC raw data that was used in the present paper.”
“Only the identification of a single vessel within a range of 2 km from the hydrophone was used to generate the data, and the background noise recordings were added from a distinct source.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Scenario radii differ between the text and Table 2
MajorThe text gives exclusion radii of 3 km and 4 km for the first two scenarios, while Table 2 gives 4 km and 5 km.
“the first had an inclusion radius of 2 km and an exclusion radius of 3 km; the second had 3 km and 4 km as the inclusion and exclusion radii; and the third had radii of 4 km and 6 km.”
“Scenario Inclusion Radius (km) Exclusion Radius (km) First 2 4 Second 3 5 Third 4 6”
VGG CQT accuracy differs between Tables 6 and 7
MajorFor the Version 2 VGG CQT condition, Table 6 reports 86.32% accuracy and Table 7 reports 86.86%, while the other three metrics are identical.
“Vers. 2 CQT 86.32 73.97 88.34 77.91”
“VGG CQT 86.86 73.97 88.34 77.91”
Version 2 image width is reported as both 126 and 128
MinorVersion 2 is described as producing 95×126 images, but its three-channel Complete representation is given a width of 128.
“the resulting representation (Version 2) had a size of 95x126.”
“Combining CQT, Gammatone, and Mel spectra resulted in data samples with dimensions of 64x63x3 for Version 1 and 95x128x3 for Version 2.”
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 74,248 · see citing works
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892 · see citing works
Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1989) · Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems · doi:10.1007/bf02551274 · Cited by 13,883 · see citing works
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643 · see citing works
SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model size
Iandola, F. N., Han, S., Moskewicz, M. W., Ashraf, K., Dally, W. J., & Keutzer, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.07360 · Cited by 6,201 · see citing works
(1989) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 3,736 · see citing works
Hannun, A. Y., Rajpurkar, P., Haghpanahi, M., Tison, G. H., Bourn, C., Turakhia, M. P., & Ng, A. Y. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0268-3 · Cited by 3,148 · see citing works
Deep Residual Shrinkage Networks for Fault Diagnosis
Zhao, M., Zhong, S., Fu, X., Tang, B., & Pecht, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2943898 · Cited by 1,447 · see citing works
A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch
Stevens, S. S., Volkmann, J., & Newman, E. B. (1937) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1915893 · Cited by 1,107 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Mel’s scale is empirically based on the way humans perceive sound [47].”
BackgroundCalculation of a constant Q spectral transform
Brown, J. C. (1991) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.400476 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Deep learning in computer vision: A critical review of emerging techniques and application scenarios
Chai, J., Zeng, H., Li, A., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2021) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100134 · Cited by 754 · see citing works
The cepstrum: A guide to processing
Childers, D. G., Skinner, D. P., & Kemerait, R. C. (1977) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1977.10747 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine LearningPreprint
Wilson, A., Roelofs, R., Stern, M., Srebro, N., & Recht, B. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.08292 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
ShipsEar: An underwater vessel noise database
Santos-Domínguez, D., Torres, S., Cardenal-López, A., & Pena, A. (2016) · Applied Acoustics · doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.06.008 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
The Effects of Ship Noise on Marine Mammals—A Review
Erbe, C., Marley, S. A., Schoeman, R. P., Smith, J. N., Trigg, L. E., & Embling, C. B. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00606 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Underwater radiated noise from modern commercial ships
McKenna, M. F., Ross, D., Wiggins, S. M., & Hildebrand, J. A. (2012) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3664100 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
O’Shaughnessy, D. D. (1999) · Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers eBooks · doi:10.1109/9780470546475 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Irfan, M., Jiangbin, Z., Ali, S., Iqbal, M., Masood, Z., & Hamid, U. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115270 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Time-Frequency Signal Analysis and Processing
Boashash, B. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2012-0-00024-5 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound
Oxenham, A. J. (2017) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011635 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Grand Challenges in Satellite Remote Sensing
Dubovik, О., Schuster, G. L., Xu, F., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Remote Sensing · doi:10.3389/frsen.2021.619818 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Monitoring ship noise to assess the impact of coastal developments on marine mammals
Merchant, N. D., Pirotta, E., Barton, T. R., et al. (2013) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.058 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Underwater Acoustic Target Classification Based on Dense Convolutional Neural Network
Doan, V.-S., Huynh-The, T., & Kim, D.-S. (2022) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2020.3029584 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Deep learning methods for underwater target feature extraction and recognition
Hu, G., Wang, K., Peng, Y., Qiu, M., Shi, J., & Liu, L. (2018) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2018/1214301 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Underwater Acoustic Signal Processing: Modeling, Detection, and Estimation
Abraham, D. A. (2019) · Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92983-5 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Passive sonar target classification using multi-layer perceptron trained by salp swarm algorithm
Khishe, M., & Mohammadi, H. (2019) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.013 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Orengo, H. A., & Garcia‐Molsosa, A. (2019) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2019.105013 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Yang, H., Li, J., Shen, S., & Xu, G. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19051104 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Wang, X., Liu, A., Zhang, Y., & Xue, F. (2019) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs11161888 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Deep Learning Techniques for Speech Emotion Recognition: A Review
Pandey, S., Shekhawat, H. S., & Prasanna, S. R. M. (2019) · International Conference Radioelektronika · doi:10.1109/radioelek.2019.8733432 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Domingos, L. C. F., Santos, P. E., Skelton, P. S. M., Brinkworth, R. S. A., & Sammut, K. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22062181 · Cited by 93 · cited 5× · see citing works
“RELATED WORK The task of underwater acoustic target classification is challenging due to the complex nature of the sound produced by vessels [25].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDeep convolution stack for waveform in underwater acoustic target recognition
Tian, S., Chen, D., Wang, H., & Liu, J. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88799-z · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Ferguson, E. L., Ramakrishnan, R., Williams, S. B., & Jin, C. T. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2017.7952638 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Integration of sonar and optical camera images using deep neural network for fish monitoring
Terayama, K., Kento, S., Mizuno, K., et al. (2019) · Aquacultural Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2019.102000 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Choi, J., Choo, Y., & Lee, K. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19163492 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Sun, Q., & Wang, K. (2022) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0009852 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Ship Type Classification by Convolutional Neural Networks with Auditory-Like Mechanisms
Shen, S., Yang, H., Yao, X., Li, J., Xu, G., & Sheng, M. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20010253 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Underwater Acoustic Research Trends with Machine Learning: Passive SONAR Applications
Yang, H., Lee, K., Choo, Y., & Kim, K. (2020) · Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology · doi:10.26748/ksoe.2020.017 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Hannun, A., Rajpurkar, P., Haghpanahi, M., Tison, G. H., Bourn, C., Turakhia, M. P., & Ng, A. Y. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0359-9 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Parameters Affecting Noise Emitted by Ships Moving in Port Areas
Nastasi, M., Fredianelli, L., Bernardini, M., et al. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208742 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Underwater Acoustic Research Trends with Machine Learning: General Background
Yang, H., Lee, K., Choo, Y., & Kim, K. (2020) · Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology · doi:10.26748/ksoe.2020.015 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Underwater acoustic target recognition method based on a joint neural network
Han, X., Ren, C., Wang, L., & Bai, Y. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266425 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Underwater Acoustic Research Trends with Machine Learning: Active SONAR Applications
Yang, H., Byun, S.-H., Lee, K., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology · doi:10.26748/ksoe.2020.018 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Review of Underwater Cable Shape Detection
Xu, C., Chen, J., Yan, D., et al. (2016) · Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · doi:10.1175/jtech-d-15-0112.1 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A novel approach to port noise characterization using an acoustic camera
Bocanegra, J. A., Borelli, D., Gaggero, T., et al. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151903 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Development of Tactile Imaging for Underwater Structural Damage Detection
Chen, X., Wu, G., Hou, S., et al. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19183925 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Adaptive Inertia: Disentangling the Effects of Adaptive Learning Rate and MomentumPreprint
Xie, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, H., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.15815 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Integration Of Neural Classifiers For Passive Sonar Signals
Ghosh, J., Turner, K., Beck, S. D., et al. (1996) · Control and dynamic systems · doi:10.1016/s0090-5267(96)80033-8 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Machine Learning Techniques for Enhancing Maritime Surveillance Based on GMTI Radar and AIS
Dästner, K., zu Roseneckh-Kohler, B. V. H., Opitz, F., et al. (2018) · International Radar Symposium · doi:10.23919/irs.2018.8447961 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Hunting for naval mines with deep neural networks
Gebhardt, D., Parikh, K., Dzieciuch, I., et al. (2017) · OCEANS 2017 – Anchorage · Cited by 16 · see citing works
An automated approach to passive sonar classification using binary image features
Vahidpour, V., Rastegarnia, A., & Khalili, A. (2015) · Journal of Marine Science and Application · doi:10.1007/s11804-015-1312-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Assessing the Underwater Ship Noise Levels in the North Tyrrhenian Sea
Rossi, E., Licitra, G., Iacoponi, A., et al. (2015) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_116 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Underwater Acoustic Target Classification with Joint Learning Framework and Data Augmentation
Chen, L., Liu, F., Li, D., Shen, T., & Zhao, D. (2022) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) · doi:10.1109/icaibd55127.2022.9820117 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Passive Ship Localization in a Shallow Water Using Pre-trained Deep Learning Networks
Wang, D., Zhang, L., Bao, C., et al. (2019) · RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · doi:10.18154/rwth-conv-238947 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A scale for the measurement of a psychological magnitude: loudness.
Stevens, S. S. (1936) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0058773
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- johannesma, 1972, The pre-response stimulus ensemble of neurons in the cochlear nucleus, Proc Symp Hearing Theory
- patterson, 0, An efficient auditory filterbank based on the gammatone function, 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey on machine learning in ship radiated noise
Hummel, H. I., van der Mei, R., & Bhulai, S. (2024) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117252 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence-Based Underwater Acoustic Target Recognition: A Survey
Feng, S., Ma, S.-Q., Zhu, X.-Q., & Yan, M. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16173333 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Jin, A., & Zeng, X. (2023) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse11010069 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
A Lightweight Network Model Based on an Attention Mechanism for Ship-Radiated Noise Classification
Yang, S., Lingzhi, X., Hong, X., & Zeng, X. (2023) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse11020432 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Zhu, P., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., Lin, B., Zhu, M., Zhao, K., & Zhou, F. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2023.3329653 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Afzal, M. U., Abdellatif, A. A., Zubair, M. F., Mehmood, M. Q., & Massoud, Y. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3323932 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Chen, Z., Tang, J.-X., Qiu, H., & Chen, M.-S. (2023) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1306229 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Hwang, S., Jun, C., Michele, C. D., et al. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24134281 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Mihailov, M. E. (2025) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse13071352 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Oceanship: A Large-Scale Dataset for Underwater Audio Target Recognition
Li, Z., Xiang, S., Yu, T., Gao, J., Ruan, J., Hu, Y., Liu, T., & Fu, Y. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-5591-2_40 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Vessel Type Classification Utilizing Underwater Acoustic Data and Deep Learning
Nathala, S. S., Yakkati, R. R., Dayal, A., et al. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) · doi:10.1109/iciea61579.2024.10665252 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Pérez, F. J., García, A. F., Martínez, A. G., et al. (2025) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse13081455 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Xiao, Q., Yu, L. C., Zhai, X., et al. (2025) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2025.110386 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Liu, H., Li, Y., Qian, T., et al. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13071043 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Constrained state estimation for underwater target tracking problem
Das, S., & Bhaumik, S. (2025) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2025.105394 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Heterogeneous Ship Data Classification with Spatial–Channel Attention with Bilinear Pooling Network
Tienin, B. W., Cui, G., Esidang, R. M., et al. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15245759 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Transfer Learning for Distance Classification of Marine Vessels Using Underwater Sound
Wout, D., Deneudt, K., Parcerisas, C., Schall, E., & Debusschere, E. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3593779 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Low-Power Architecture for Passive Acoustic Autonomous Maritime Surveillance
Vasconcelos, H. M., Sousa, P. J. S. C. P., Dias, S., Pinto, J. P., van Golde, I., Tavares, P. J., & Moreira, P. (2026) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse14090815 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Enhancing Underwater Acoustic Signal Classification with CAM++ and Change Point Features
Li, Y., Xiao, Q., Hu, K., Fang, Y., & Duan, J. (2024) · IEEE Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS) · doi:10.1109/ddcls61622.2024.10606598 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Deng, Y., Xu, L., Huang, J., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/icccas65806.2025.11102749 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Vasconcelos, H. M., Sousa, P. J. S. C. P., Silva, A., et al. (2026) · Procedia Structural Integrity · doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2026.01.076 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Deep Dive: Unveiling the Latest in Sonar Signal Classification Through the Power of Deep Learning
Chinni, K. V., Karanam, R., Nagidi, N., & Thadikemalla, V. S. G. (2024) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Green and Sustainable Technologies (ICCIGST) · doi:10.1109/iccigst60741.2024.10717592 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Jithina, T. S., & Manikandan, M. S. (2025) · doi:10.1109/icmlas64557.2025.10968092 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Architecture for ROVs detection and positioning based on hydrophone arrays
Belmonte-Hernández, A., García, A. F., Ortiz-Toro, C. A., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/eeite65381.2025.11166125
Underwater Acoustical Sensing for Target Localization With Rational Orthogonal Wavelet Signaling
Guo, T., Lim, E. G., López‐Benítez, M., et al. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2025.3577516
Cui, H., Chu, X., Li, G., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC) · doi:10.1109/icivc66358.2025.11200383
Benchmarking Transfer Learning in Passive Sonar: An Evaluation Study
Ingham, F., Culwick, R., Williams, D. P., & Hospedales, T. M. (2025) · Machine learning for signal processing ... · doi:10.1109/mlsp62443.2025.11204218
Cao, S., Liu, Y. M., Jia, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2025.3629835
Construction of a Structured Maritime Dataset Using Acoustic and AIS Data
Shin, S., Kim, Y., Kang, D., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/icmic66299.2025.11257810
Ning, F. (2024) · International Conference on Applied Machine Learning (ICAML) · doi:10.1109/icaml64299.2024.00048
Najamuddin, N., Sheikh, U. U., & Sha’ameri, A. Z. (2026) · Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies · doi:10.1007/s42417-025-02295-6
Eyvazi, F. J., Frazao, F. S., Halliday, W. D., et al. (2026) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0043937
Zhu, B., Xu, Q., Su, Y., Zhu, Q., Guo, S., Sun, Y., Chen, W., & Xu, K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-0836-5_17
Jia, X., Liu, H., Hou, Q., et al. (2026) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.126851
Kumar, M., & Kundu, N. K. (2026) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2026.3713248
Suresh, V., & Allam, M. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3726539
Multi-Task U-Net for Denoising and Coarse Source Separation in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks
Suresh, V., & Chandar, B. M. (2026) · Boletim da Sociedade Paranaense de Matemática · doi:10.5269/bspm.85380
- Authors
- Domingos, L. C. F., Santos, P. E., Skelton, P. S. M., Brinkworth, R. S. A., & Sammut, K.
- Affiliations
- Centro Universitário FEI (BR)
- Flinders University (AU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 117582-117596
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4313066531
- Semantic Scholar
- 1c6b028cb86baaa64dac62655b0633cf59733406
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Underwater Acoustics Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
- Keywords
- ship classification, underwater acoustic signals, acoustic monitoring, marine protected area monitoring, illegal fishing, constant-Q transform, gammatone filterbank, Mel spectrogram, ResNet, VGG, convolutional neural networks, signal preprocessing, coastal monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-17.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-17.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review