Cited by 3,148ECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network

Open access
Hannun, Awni Y., Rajpurkar, Pranav, Haghpanahi, Masoumeh, Tison, Geoffrey H., Bourn, Codie, Turakhia, Mintu P., Ng, Andrew Y.·2019·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Computerized electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation plays a critical role in the clinical ECG workflow 1. Widely available digital ECG data and the algorithmic paradigm of deep learning 2 present an opportunity to substantially improve the accuracy and scalability of automated ECG analysis. However, a comprehensive evaluation of an end-to-end deep learning approach for ECG analysis across a wide variety of diagnostic classes has not been previously reported. Here, we develop a deep neural network (DNN) to classify 12 rhythm classes using 91,232 single-lead ECGs from 53,549 patients who used a single-lead ambulatory ECG monitoring device. When validated against an independent test dataset annotated by a consensus committee of board-certified practicing cardiologists, the DNN achieved an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of 0.97. The average F 1 score, which is the harmonic mean of the positive predictive value and sensitivity, for the DNN (0.837) exceeded that of average cardiologists (0.780). With specificity fixed at the average specificity achieved by cardiologists, the sensitivity of the DNN exceeded the average cardiologist sensitivity for all rhythm classes. These findings demonstrate that an end-to-end deep learning approach can classify a broad range of distinct arrhythmias from single-lead ECGs with high diagnostic performance similar to that of cardiologists. If confirmed in clinical settings, this approach could reduce the rate of misdiagnosed computerized ECG interpretations and improve the efficiency of expert human ECG interpretation by accurately triaging or prioritizing the most urgent conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-018-0268-3

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Federated learning has tremendous potential in healthcare, particularly towards addressing health disparities, under-served populations, and rare diseases, by enabling machine learning models to gain knowledge from ample and diverse data that would otherwise not be available.

    “FL has tremendous potential in healthcare22,23, particularly towards addressing health disparities, under-served populations, and “rare” diseases24, by enabling ML models to gain knowledge from ample and diverse data that would otherwise not be available.”
  • A DNN using single-lead ambulatory ECG data classified 12 rhythm classes with high diagnostic performance similar to, and perhaps exceeding, practicing cardiologists.

    “A DNN that used single-lead, ambulatory ECG data was able to classify 12 rhythm classes with a high diagnostic performance similar to, and perhaps exceeding, practicing cardiologists57.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L & McGinnis M. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. (The Institute of Medicine. The National Academies Press, 2012). doi: 10.17226/13444 24901184 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hannun, A. Y., Rajpurkar, P., Haghpanahi, M., Tison, G. H., Bourn, C., Turakhia, M. P., & Ng, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • iRhythm (United States) (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Hannun, Awni Y.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2019-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
65-69
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2902644322
Cited by
3,148
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 546 · 2025: 488 · 2024: 367 · 2023: 396 · 2022: 432 · 2021: 410 · 2020: 351 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 2
FWCI
173.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • iRhythm Technologies
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL135274)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
arrhythmia detection, arrhythmia classification, Holter monitoring, single-lead ECG, deep neural network, automated ECG analysis, automated diagnosis
MeSH terms
Cardiologists, Algorithms, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Electrocardiography, Humans, ROC Curve, Neural Networks, Computer, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review