Cited by 31Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsControl Systems and Identification

Transfer Learning Techniques for the Lithium-Ion Battery State of Charge Estimation

Open access
Eleftheriadis, Panagiotis, Giazitzis, Spyridon, Leva, Sonia, Ogliari, Emanuele·2024·IEEE Access

Abstract

State of Charge (SOC) estimation is vital for battery management systems (BMS), impacting battery efficiency and lifespan. Accurate SOC estimation is challenging due to battery complexity and limited data for training Machine Learning based models. Transfer learning (TL) leverages pre-trained models, reducing training time and improving generalization in SOC estimation. In this paper, 8 different transfer learning techniques are examined, which were applied in four different models (LSTM, GRU, BiLSTM, and BiGRU) for SOC estimation. These transfer learning techniques have been applied to three datasets for re-training the models and results have been compared with the same models defined by Bayesian Hyperparameter Optimization. The TL4 and TL5 techniques consistently stood out as among the most efficient in both accuracy and computational time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2023.3337215

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Eleftheriadis, P., Giazitzis, S., Leva, S., & Ogliari, E.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Corresponding author
Eleftheriadis, Panagiotis
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2024
Volume
12
Pages
993-1004
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389040886
Cited by
31
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
MOST–Sustainable Mobility Center through the European Union Next-GenerationEU (PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA (CN00000023)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
state of charge estimation, lithium-ion batteries, transfer learning, battery management systems, LSTM, GRU, bidirectional LSTM, bidirectional GRU, Bayesian hyperparameter optimization, limited training data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review