The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant Leaf Disease Detection, Classification, and Diagnosis Using Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Agriculture is the ultimate imperative and primary source of origin to furnish domestic income for multifarious countries. The disease caused in plants due to various pathogens like viruses, fungi, and bacteria is liable for considerable monetary losses in the agriculture corporation across the world. The security of crops concerning quality and quantity is crucial to monitor disease in plants. Thus, recognition of plant disease is essential. The plant disease syndrome is noticeable in distinct parts of plants. Nonetheless, commonly the infection is detected in distinct leaves of plants. Computer vision, deep learning, few-shot learning, and soft computing techniques are utilized by various investigators to automatically identify the disease in plants via leaf images. These techniques also benefit farmers in achieving expeditious and appropriate actions to avoid a reduction in the quality and quantity of crops. The application of these techniques in the recognition of disease can avert the disadvantage of origin by a factious selection of disease features, extraction of features, and boost the speed of technology and efficiency of research. Also, certain molecular techniques have been established to prevent and mitigate the pathogenic threat. Hence, this review helps the investigator to automatically detect disease in plants using machine learning, deep learning and few shot learning and provide certain diagnosis techniques to prevent disease. Moreover, some of the future works in the classification of disease are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Identity mappings in deep residual networks
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38 · Cited by 10,741
Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.05027 · Cited by 10,665
A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks
Buda, M., Maki, A., & Mazurowski, M. A. (2018) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.011 · Cited by 3,088 · cited 1×
“Therefore, FSL is the best possible feasible solu-tion for a confined number of samples [253], [254].”
BackgroundMachine learning and deep learning
Janiesch, C., Zschech, P., & Heinrich, K. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2 · Cited by 2,959
Bergsträsser, S., Fanourakis, D., Schmittgen, S., Cendrero-Mateo, M., Jansen, M., Scharr, H., & Rascher, U. (2015) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/s13007-015-0043-0 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhargava, A., Shukla, A., Goswami, O. P., Alsharif, M. H., Uthansakul, P., & Uthansakul, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 37443-37469
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392406133
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 35.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Leaf Disease Detection, Classification, and Diagnosis Using Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2024.3373001
- The paper
- Bhargava, A., Shukla, A., Goswami, O. P., Alsharif, M. H., Uthansakul, P., & Uthansakul, M. (2024). Plant Leaf Disease Detection, Classification, and Diagnosis Using Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence: A Review. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3373001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.